CA11: 4A doesn’t require “in the presence of the officer” for misdemeanor arrest

While Georgia law requires a misdemeanor offense be in the presence of the officer, the Fourth Amendment does not. The arrest was constitutionally valid. Middlebrooks v. Kasmar, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 5855 (11th Cir. Feb. 27, 2026).

There was information from corroborated informant tips justifying the search warrant, and it was not stale. United States v. Alward, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39894 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2026).*

The car was in a woman’s name, and she had one set of keys and her phone was locked inside. She had common authority to consent to its search. A cell phone was seized incident to arrest, and probable cause developed that it could have evidence of commercial sex trafficking on it. United States v. Parker, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38812 (D.D.C. Feb. 25, 2026).*

There was no GPS installed on claimant’s vehicle. It was just surveilled. United States v. 1. Assorted Marijuana Grow Equip., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40277 (D. Colo. Feb. 18, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.