Monthly Archives: May 2025

D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

Media Matters stated a claim in D.C. for First Amendment retaliation by the Texas Attorney General’s civil investigative demand for records based on not liking their reporting. Injunction affirmed. Media Matters for America v. Paxton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13155 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Private search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Ptf stated 1A retaliation claim over civil investigative demand

CA6: Two officers with separate PC can use one warrant

When two officers have separate probable cause to search, they don’t need separate search warrants, as long as the description covers their purpose. At least qualified immunity applies here. Fitzpatrick v. Hanney, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13214 (6th Cir. May … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Two officers with separate PC can use one warrant

N.D.Fla.: Police going to backyard with a drug dog violated curtilage

Officers went into defendant’s backyard with a drug dog and that unreasonably invaded the curtilage. United States v. Holland, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102751 (N.D. Fla. May 30, 2025):

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Police going to backyard with a drug dog violated curtilage

D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

Reading a prisoner’s legal mail may violate the First Amendment, but he can’t show that it violated the Fourth Amendment because there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in prison and nothing interfered with his cases. Lewis v. Conway, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

E.D.Mich.: PC showing was thin, but good enough for the GFE

The probable cause showing was thin, but it was enough, and the good faith exception applies in any event. United States v. Mills, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102174 (E.D. Mich. May 29, 2025)*:

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC showing was thin, but good enough for the GFE

W.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was unjustified, and SW based on what seen was suppressed

Defendant had managerial control over the business property searched enough that he had standing to challenge its search. The security sweep of the second floor was not reasonable and, to the USMJ, “ma[de] no sense”; there was no articulable reason … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Independent source, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Protective sweep was unjustified, and SW based on what seen was suppressed

WSJ: Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment

WSJ: Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment by Lauro Landro (“New systems for documenting outpatient visits are adding features and moving into hospitals; ‘we are just scratching the surface’”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WSJ: Why AI May Be Listening In on Your Next Doctor’s Appointment

NYT: Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans

NYT: Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans by Sheera Frenkel and Aaron Krolik (“In March, President Trump signed an executive order calling for the federal government to share data across agencies, raising questions over whether he might compile … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on NYT: Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans

Reason: Illinois Cops Gave ICE Access to More Than 5,000 Surveillance Cameras Nationwide

Reason: Illinois Cops Gave ICE Access to More Than 5,000 Surveillance Cameras Nationwide by Autumn Billings (“A public records request from the Danville, Illinois, police department obtained by 404 Media revealed that local and state police around the country searched … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on Reason: Illinois Cops Gave ICE Access to More Than 5,000 Surveillance Cameras Nationwide

D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

Defendant’s Franks motion fails because the government can justify a warrantless search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. United States v. Childs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101370 (D.N.J. May 28, 2025). Plaintiff’s false arrest claim isn’t barred by Heck, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

OH1: Drug dog’s instinctive jump into car window wasn’t unreasonable

The drug dog’s instinctive jump into the window of defendant’s car wasn’t initiated by the handler, so it wasn’t unreasonable. State v. Barton, 2025-Ohio-1904 (1st Dist. May 28, 2025) (2-1). “As already discussed, Parr had reason to believe Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Drug dog’s instinctive jump into car window wasn’t unreasonable

D.Kan.: Can invoke Randolph objection to consent without objecting

Defendant’s live-in girlfriend consented to a search of their apartment when he was arrested and removed. He can’t invoke Randolph because he never objected. United States v. Lee, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100923 (D. Kan. May 28, 2025). Defendant’s refusal … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Particularity, Privileges | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Can invoke Randolph objection to consent without objecting

S.D.Cal.: FinCEN’s SWB GTO for financial reporting enjoined for APA reasons; 4A not reached yet

FinCEN’s Southwest Border Geographic Targeting Order (SWB GTO) for enhanced reporting requirements in certain zip codes appears to have been adopted without proper authority under the Administrative Procedure Act. The Fourth Amendment claim is deferred until later as unnecessary at … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: FinCEN’s SWB GTO for financial reporting enjoined for APA reasons; 4A not reached yet

TX5: No standing in a house where def under a no contact order to stay out

Defendant had no standing to contest the search of a house he was under a no contact order to stay away from. Yet, he was found there. Coggins v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 3587 (Tex. App. – Dallas May … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX5: No standing in a house where def under a no contact order to stay out

MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

Uncorroborated anonymous tip: “Because the affidavit relies almost entirely on an uncorroborated anonymous tip and includes no information regarding the tipster’s reliability or the specific details of the anonymous tip, it failed to supply the warrant-issuing judge with a reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

MT: No RS for continued stop, but def consented to it

The officer’s observation of “a driver’s nervousness, an unspecified prior history of drug use, and the officer’s assertion that the driver failed to pull over quickly enough do not alone combine to show particularized suspicion of illegal drug activity.” Nevertheless, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: No RS for continued stop, but def consented to it

MT: Use of a flashlight to look in a parked car was not 4A violation

Police use of a flashlight to look in a car in a parking lot the officer was interested in because the operator was on probation was reasonable. State v. Roberts, 2025 MT 110, 2025 Mont. LEXIS 567 (May 27, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on MT: Use of a flashlight to look in a parked car was not 4A violation

The Intercept: U.S. Spy Agencies Are Getting a One-Stop Shop to Buy Your Most Sensitive Personal Data

The Intercept: U.S. Spy Agencies Are Getting a One-Stop Shop to Buy Your Most Sensitive Personal Data by Sam Biddle (“The ever-growing market for personal data has been a boon for American spy agencies. The U.S. intelligence community is now … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Intercept: U.S. Spy Agencies Are Getting a One-Stop Shop to Buy Your Most Sensitive Personal Data

MI: Taking and searching def’s cell phone after DA’s interview was not by consent

Defendant was questioned under a prosecutor’s subpoena, and they decided to take his phone to search it. The state’s argument of consent fails because he was told they were taking it and had probable cause but they didn’t. People v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on MI: Taking and searching def’s cell phone after DA’s interview was not by consent

D.C.Cir.: A helpful history of national security searches in Page v. Comey

For a helpful history of national security searches, see Page v. Comey, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 12547 (D.C. Cir. May 23, 2025). Pro se doctor plaintiff failed to object to USMJ’s F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) recommendation, do it’s waived. Pompy v. First … Continue reading

Posted in National security, School searches, Waiver | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: A helpful history of national security searches in Page v. Comey