Monthly Archives: June 2022

OH8: Disavowing reliance on Franks at suppression hearing is waiver

Defendant’s disavowing the search issue in his motion to suppress involved Franks is waiver for appeal. The state sought clarification it wasn’t an issue and got it. State v. Claytor, 2022-Ohio-1938, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1812 (8th Dist. June 9, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH8: Disavowing reliance on Franks at suppression hearing is waiver

CA8: Shoplifting arrest supported search incident of backpack; inevitable anyway

The search of defendant’s backpack incident to a shoplifting arrest produced a firearm. Even if the search incident wasn’t proper, it was inevitable the backpack would be inventoried at the jail.United States v. Trogdon, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 15860 (8th … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident | Comments Off on CA8: Shoplifting arrest supported search incident of backpack; inevitable anyway

CA8: Apparent authority to consent applies to effects

Apparent authority to consent applies to effects. The officer had reason to believe that the other female occupant of the car had apparent authority to consent to a search of what was listed in the report as a “man bag,” … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8: Apparent authority to consent applies to effects

CNS: Can police secretly spy on your home without a warrant? The First Circuit doesn’t know

CNS: Can police secretly spy on your home without a warrant? The First Circuit doesn’t know by Thomas F. Harrison:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CNS: Can police secretly spy on your home without a warrant? The First Circuit doesn’t know

W.D.Okla.: An alleged victim’s vague claim a group of men ‘were after him’ is not RS

“Applying these standards, and giving deference to all inferences Officer Nitzky could reasonably have drawn in favor of the credibility of Mr. Ingram’s complaint, the Court concludes that the detention and search of Defendant at the Denny’s on December 14, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: An alleged victim’s vague claim a group of men ‘were after him’ is not RS

StarTribune: Ex-Minneapolis officer sentenced to three years in prison for stealing drugs during traffic stops

StarTribune: Ex-Minneapolis officer sentenced to three years in prison for stealing drugs during traffic stops by Randy Furst (“A former Minneapolis police officer who conducted questionable traffic stops in order to steal people’s drugs was sentenced Wednesday in U.S. District … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on StarTribune: Ex-Minneapolis officer sentenced to three years in prison for stealing drugs during traffic stops

SCOTUSBlog: Court constricts, even if it does not quite eliminate, damages actions under Bivens

SCOTUSBlog: Court constricts, even if it does not quite eliminate, damages actions under Bivens by Howard M. Wasserman:

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Court constricts, even if it does not quite eliminate, damages actions under Bivens

D.Me.: Dropbox CP search reported to NCMEC wasn’t exceeded by police

Dropbox reported child pornography to NCMEC, and its search did not exceed Dropbox’s private search. United States v. Orne, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100146 (D.Me. June 6, 2022).* The wiretap application is based on overwhelming probable cause. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Independent source, Private search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Dropbox CP search reported to NCMEC wasn’t exceeded by police

HI: DWI stop not “custody”, and statements made during FST were admissible

Defendant was not in custody at the time she made statements during a FST. State v. Sagapolutele-Silva, 2022 Haw. LEXIS 85 (June 3, 2022); State v. Manion, 2022 Haw. LEXIS 86 (June 3, 2022). Defendant’s claim that her daughter was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Custody, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: DWI stop not “custody”, and statements made during FST were admissible

NYT: How a New York County Used the State’s ‘Red Flag’ Law to Seize 160 Guns

NYT: How a New York County Used the State’s ‘Red Flag’ Law to Seize 160 Guns by Andy Newman, Benjamin Weiser and Ashley Southall (“Suffolk County on Long Island aggressively uses the law to take guns from people in crisis … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYT: How a New York County Used the State’s ‘Red Flag’ Law to Seize 160 Guns

New article: Unintentional Destruction: Torres v. Madrid, in Defining a Fourth Amendment Seizure of the Person as a Common Law Arrest, Turned Terry v. Ohio into Collateral Damage,

George M. Dery III, Unintentional Destruction: Torres v. Madrid, in Defining a Fourth Amendment Seizure of the Person as a Common Law Arrest, Turned Terry v. Ohio into Collateral Damage, 49 Hastings Const. L.Q. 83 (2022), Abstract:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Seizure | Comments Off on New article: Unintentional Destruction: Torres v. Madrid, in Defining a Fourth Amendment Seizure of the Person as a Common Law Arrest, Turned Terry v. Ohio into Collateral Damage,

S.D.Miss.: Taint team after a SW isn’t a judicial function, rejecting Baltimore Law Firm

This district court rejects, as has S.D.N.Y., the Art. III function of filter teams reviewing searches of Baltimore Law Firm. (In re Search Warrant Issued June 13, 2019 (“Baltimore Law Firm”), 942 F.3d 159, 170-71 (4th Cir. 2019)). Too much … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Taint team after a SW isn’t a judicial function, rejecting Baltimore Law Firm

D.Ariz.: Nighttime search rule doesn’t bar nighttime arrest warrant execution

As to arrest warrants, Rule 41 and 21 U.S.C. § 879 aren’t clear on whether a nighttime entry is barred for execution of an arrest warrant. (Tie goes to the government on reasonableness.) A violation of knock-and-announce doesn’t invoke the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Nighttime search rule doesn’t bar nighttime arrest warrant execution

OH2: Warrant found during traffic stop justified search of person

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and a warrant surfaced. That justified a search incident of his person. State v. Fleming, 2022-Ohio-1876, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1749 (2d Dist. June 3, 2022). Plaintiff’s claim on appeal that probable cause … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Search incident, Waiver | Comments Off on OH2: Warrant found during traffic stop justified search of person

M.D.Ga.: Dropping cell phone in flight from wrecked car is abandonment

A series of alleged crimes and other actions of the defendant was probable cause to search defendant’s phone found in his car. [There is no nexus to the crimes mentioned in the opinion, so I submit it’s wrong on this … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Exclusionary rule, Knock and talk, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: Dropping cell phone in flight from wrecked car is abandonment

E.D.Tenn.: Finding ammo not matching seized firearm justifies further search

Officers finding ammunition from a different caliber gun than the one found justifies a further search. United States v. Berry, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98684 (E.D.Tenn. May 3, 2022), adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98639 (E.D.Tenn. June 2, 2022). Plaintiff’s … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Search incident, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Finding ammo not matching seized firearm justifies further search

D.Iowa: CA8 probably wouldn’t adopt CA5’s private search foreseeability element

A foreseeability requirement in the private search doctrine, apparently applicable in the Fifth Circuit is not followed in this district court in the Eighth Circuit. United States v. Hayes, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98528 (D.Iowa June 2, 2022):

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on D.Iowa: CA8 probably wouldn’t adopt CA5’s private search foreseeability element

D.Ore.: Officer can be cross-examined at trial on his SW affidavit

The government’s motion in limine against crossing the IRS agent on his search warrant affidavit is denied. The search has already been litigated, and defendant can’t use this as a “mini-Franks hearing.” The government can object if it goes far … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.Ore.: Officer can be cross-examined at trial on his SW affidavit

CA3: Customs searches occur to and from VI; here bag was put into baggage claim to see who claimed it

Customs can search bags coming to and from the Virgin Islands. Here, bags on an airplane were searched and it was returned to baggage claim to see who picked it up, and that was reasonable. United States v. Forde, 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Dog sniff | Comments Off on CA3: Customs searches occur to and from VI; here bag was put into baggage claim to see who claimed it

MO: Inventory followed policy without putting it into evidence

The officer testified his inventory followed policy, but no written policy was admitted into evidence. It was up to the trial court to believe the officer on policy or not, and it did. State v. Teel, 2022 Mo. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Nexus | Comments Off on MO: Inventory followed policy without putting it into evidence