S.D.Miss.: Taint team after a SW isn’t a judicial function, rejecting Baltimore Law Firm

This district court rejects, as has S.D.N.Y., the Art. III function of filter teams reviewing searches of Baltimore Law Firm. (In re Search Warrant Issued June 13, 2019 (“Baltimore Law Firm”), 942 F.3d 159, 170-71 (4th Cir. 2019)). Too much work; court should see privileged stuff. [What about a Magistrate or special master?] United States v. Ritchey, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99335 (S.D.Miss. June 3, 2022).

The officer admittedly was interested in drugs during this traffic stop, and that made the questions unrelated to the traffic ticket an unreasonable extension of the stop. United States v. Parks, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99662 (W.D.N.Y. June 3, 2022).

Counting prior revocations of DLs as offenses for DWI violates Birchfield. State v. Forrett, 2022 WI 37, 2022 Wisc. LEXIS 51 (June 3, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.