CNS: Can police secretly spy on your home without a warrant? The First Circuit doesn’t know

CNS: Can police secretly spy on your home without a warrant? The First Circuit doesn’t know by Thomas F. Harrison:

Despite three years’ deliberation on the issue, the First Circuit failed to decide whether police may install a secret video camera outside someone’s home and record everything that happens there for eight months without a warrant.

The en banc court split 3-3 in a 129-page ruling, leaving the issue completely up in the air.

Judges Sandra Lynch, Jeffrey Howard and Gustavo Gelpí saw no reason why police need a warrant to record what anyone walking by a home can see.

“People are frequently filmed in public, with or without their consent, and these videos can be posted online and viewed thousands of times,” they wrote. They added that “a basic model of one brand of doorbell security camera can be purchased for just $51.99,” after which they provided a citation to a review in Wired magazine.

“Indeed, there are now often demands that officers wear video cameras on their persons as they perform their duties,” they noted.

But Judges David Barron, O. Rogeriee Thompson and William Kayatta — all Obama appointees — argued that even if a casual observer walking by could see or even videotape what was happening outside the home, this case was different.

United States v. Moore-Bush, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 15893 (1st Cir. June 9, 2022) (3-3, en banc)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.