Category Archives: Seizure

NC: Warrant not needed to access data from GPS for post-conviction supervision

The data generated from the GPS attached to defendant as part of his post-conviction supervision can be accessed by law enforcement without a warrant. State v. Thomas, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 687 (Sep. 3, 2024). The Tenth Circuit has made … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Warrant not needed to access data from GPS for post-conviction supervision

CAAF: Remote erasure of seized cell phone supported tampering conviction

Defendant’s conviction for interfering with a seizure under UCMJ 131e is affirmed. NIS had seized the phone but not yet put it in a Faraday bag to protect it when she remotely erased it. United States v. Strong, 2024 CAAF … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CAAF: Remote erasure of seized cell phone supported tampering conviction

FL3: Officers could enter def’s home to make his arrest with an arrest warrant

Defendant was convicted of resisting arrest without violence. The jury was properly instructed that the officers could enter his home on an arrest warrant. Martinez v. State, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 6538 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 21, 2024). Plaintiff’s malicious … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on FL3: Officers could enter def’s home to make his arrest with an arrest warrant

CADC: Unreasonable retention of property after a case is resolved can violate 4A

Looking to the common law, unreasonable retention of property after a case is resolved can violate the Fourth Amendment. Asinor v. District of Columbia, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 20098 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 9, 2024):

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on CADC: Unreasonable retention of property after a case is resolved can violate 4A

MN: PC required to get order to produce DNA for comparison to evidence

A court order for defendant’s saliva for a touch DNA comparison required a showing of probable cause. State v. Steeprock, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 345 (July 29, 2024). “[T]he record evidence demonstrates that three police officers ran from the police … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Private search, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on MN: PC required to get order to produce DNA for comparison to evidence

MI: Partially blocking a car can be a seizure, here without RS

“A seizure may occur when a police vehicle partially blocks a defendant’s egress if the totality of the circumstances indicate that a reasonable person would not have felt free to leave; while the position of the police vehicle is an … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on MI: Partially blocking a car can be a seizure, here without RS

CA8: It was not clearly established at the time that a dog bite is a 4A seizure

“After an on-duty police K9 bit Officer Daniel Irish while they both pursued a suspect, he sued the K9’s handler, Deputy Keith McNamara, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violating his Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: It was not clearly established at the time that a dog bite is a 4A seizure

D.Mass.: Passenger putting something under the seat shows no REP

A passenger putting something under the seat when in a car manifests no reasonable expectation of privacy and thus no standing. United States v. Dunnell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124927 (D. Mass. July 16, 2024). (Apparently one needs to keep … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Passenger putting something under the seat shows no REP

D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

On remand in Torres v. Madrid, 141 S. Ct. 989, 209 L.Ed.2d 190 (Mar. 25, 2021), the defendant’s summary judgment motion is denied. Torres v. Madrid, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117079 (D.N.M. July 2, 2024).* An out-of-state temporary plate where … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

CA11: Denial of 41(g) motion for return of property not appealable while case or investigation is going on

Denial of a Rule 41(g) motion for return of property lacks jurisdiction for an interlocutory appeal when there’s a pending criminal investigation. Burke v. United States, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 12590 (11th Cir. May 24, 2024). “Considering the totality of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Denial of 41(g) motion for return of property not appealable while case or investigation is going on

CA10: Eight-hour seizure of home investigating OD before getting SW was unreasonable

“After Corban Elmore’s teenage son suffered a drug overdose at Elmore’s home, law-enforcement officers secured the scene and prohibited anyone from entering the house. The officers then continued to investigate and allowed almost eight hours to elapse before applying for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: Eight-hour seizure of home investigating OD before getting SW was unreasonable

MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant to get them. “Despite the narrowing of the third-party doctrine in other contexts, it remains applicable to call detail records. Notwithstanding recent technological changes, the phone numbers an individual dials are … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Seizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

DC: Lights, coming out of car with hand on gun, and “Let me see your hands” was a seizure

This was a show of authority: “With the emergency lights activated, each officer exited the vehicle and yelled, ‘Let me see your hands’ and quickly approached Mr. Mitchell. Officer Phillip had a hand on her firearm while doing so. Officers … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Custody, Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Lights, coming out of car with hand on gun, and “Let me see your hands” was a seizure

DE: Officers approaching men on a stoop at night with a police dog saying “nobody move” was a seizure

Officers approaching men on a stoop at 10 pm with a police dog and saying “nobody move” was a seizure. Here it was with reasonable suspicion based on a CI’s information that was detailed, reliable, and significantly corroborated. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on DE: Officers approaching men on a stoop at night with a police dog saying “nobody move” was a seizure

W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to say CI was reliable when the facts and circumstances alleged showed it

Defendant’s allegations of the police not saying in the warrant affidavit the CI was reliable doesn’t matter because the affidavit for warrant shows otherwise why the CI was credited. There was probable cause. To the extent this would be considered … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to say CI was reliable when the facts and circumstances alleged showed it

CA9: Officer stopping to check on an already stopped motorcycle wasn’t a seizure

Defendant’s motorcycle was already stopped on the side of the road. The officer pulling up to check on him wasn’t a seizure. United States v. Melgoza, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 8384 (9th Cir. Apr. 8, 2024). FISA warrants have a … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Officer stopping to check on an already stopped motorcycle wasn’t a seizure

CA10: Def’s possession of a gun six days ago can add to RS now

In the reasonable suspicion calculus, the fact defendant had a gun six days earlier can be a factor in reasonable suspicion now. United States v. Minners, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7734 (10th Cir. Apr. 2, 2024). Plaintiffs were loaded on … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s possession of a gun six days ago can add to RS now

CA7: False arrest claims before trial are 4A claims; due process after trial

“Claims for false arrest prior to trial are appropriately considered under the Fourth Amendment, not the Fourteenth Amendment. Manuel v. City of Joliet, Illinois, 580 U.S. 357, 367 (2017) (‘If the complaint is that a form of legal process resulted … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Immigration arrests, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: False arrest claims before trial are 4A claims; due process after trial

NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

The ability to seize a cell phone with exigent circumstances doesn’t include the state’s ability to search it without a warrant. Smith v. State, 2024 Nev. LEXIS 14 (Mar. 28, 2024). Defendant wasn’t seized when the officer first approached him. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

CA11: There was PC to take def’s picture in public; seizure question moot

Regardless of whether defendant was seized, there was probable case to encounter him and take his picture in a public place. United States v. Daniels, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7522 (11th Cir. Mar. 29, 2024). Defendant wasn’t seized when he … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: There was PC to take def’s picture in public; seizure question moot