Category Archives: Seizure

TN: Motion for return of property doesn’t require a motion to suppress and can come after judgment

A state motion for return of property does not require a motion to suppress. “Additionally, the State’s argument that the trial court lacks jurisdiction because the judgment has become final is misplaced. The Defendant is not seeking to challenge his … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on TN: Motion for return of property doesn’t require a motion to suppress and can come after judgment

UT: Police car’s overhead lights usually mean seizure to the motorist the police car is behind

A police car’s overhead lights can be ambiguous, but, to the motorist, they mean you are stopped and should not attempt to leave. It’s common knowledge the consequences of not staying stopped could be severe. Defendant was thus stopped, but … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Seizure | Comments Off on UT: Police car’s overhead lights usually mean seizure to the motorist the police car is behind

CA6: Officers’ civil assist ended up in stating a claim in the retaking of a car

Officers were on a civil assist in aiding repossession of a car that was involved in a family dispute going back and forth for a couple of years. “Viewing the record in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, we agree … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Officers’ civil assist ended up in stating a claim in the retaking of a car

DC: Custody for Miranda and Fifth Amendment purposes may be different than custody for Fourth Amendment purposes

Custody for Miranda and Fifth Amendment purposes may be different than custody for Fourth Amendment purposes. Morton v. United States, 2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 516 (Oct. 29, 2015):

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Custody for Miranda and Fifth Amendment purposes may be different than custody for Fourth Amendment purposes

OH9: Ordering a person out of a car at gunpoint after a stop is a seizure

Ordering a person out of a car at gunpoint after a stop is a seizure even if based on an alleged furtive movement. The stop was based on a robbery report, and this vehicle was more than a half mile … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH9: Ordering a person out of a car at gunpoint after a stop is a seizure

OH7: Burning MJ coming from an apartment is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency to enter

Police answered a loud music call at 5 am in an apartment building, and they could smell burning marijuana outside defendant’s apartment door. Burning marijuana is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency for a police entry. A 1995 Ohio case … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH7: Burning MJ coming from an apartment is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency to enter

IL: A forced chemical test of the blood two days after an accident was after the reduced REP of a driver had lapsed

A chemical test of appellant’s blood violated the Fourth Amendment because the police sought a chemical test two days after the car accident when plaintiff no longer had a diminished expectation of privacy. McElwain v. Office of the Ill. Secy. … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: A forced chemical test of the blood two days after an accident was after the reduced REP of a driver had lapsed

CA2: Ordering a person to leave a courthouse is likely not a seizure, but grabbing his collar and forcing him to move is a seizure

Ordering a person to leave a courthouse is likely not a seizure. Grabbing his collar and forcing him to move is a seizure. It is subject to the reasonableness requirement. Salmon v. Blesser, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16070 (2d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA2: Ordering a person to leave a courthouse is likely not a seizure, but grabbing his collar and forcing him to move is a seizure

E.D.Pa.: IAC claim has to say what def counsel didn’t try to suppress

An ineffective assistance claim that says defense counsel was ineffective for failing to move to suppress without saying what should have been suppressed states no claim at all. [It would also have to say that it would have been granted … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: IAC claim has to say what def counsel didn’t try to suppress

N.D.Cal.: Warrant for seizure of pictures of def precluded seizure of pictures of others

The search warrant here authorized seizure of photographs that depicted defendant, but photos of others were seized, and they are suppressed for being outside the warrant. United States v. Williams, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117274 (N.D.Cal. September 1, 2015). Plainclothes … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Warrant for seizure of pictures of def precluded seizure of pictures of others

ID: Consent to a BAC test in the face of the sanctions for refusal is not unconstitutional coercion

Consent to a BAC test in the face of the sanctions for refusal is not unconstitutional coercion. State v. Riendeau, 2015 Ida. LEXIS 218 (August 24, 2015). Exigency of looking for the victim of a serious crime justified the entry … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Consent to a BAC test in the face of the sanctions for refusal is not unconstitutional coercion

CA3: Sexual advances in a gov’tal workplace are not a Fourth Amendment search or seizure

“While Fourth Amendment protections may extend to ‘[s]earches and seizures by government employers or supervisors,’ O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709, 715, 107 S. Ct. 1492, 94 L. Ed. 2d 714 (1987), we agree with the District Court that the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Search, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Sexual advances in a gov’tal workplace are not a Fourth Amendment search or seizure

CADC: Def’s argument about privacy interest fails where SW ultimately issued for search of boxes of records; should have argued possessory interest lost

22 boxes of records were placed in a Ford Explorer to take them away from a business when the USSS arrived and took them without searching right away, waiting to get a search warrant. Defendant’s argument was premised solely on … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CADC: Def’s argument about privacy interest fails where SW ultimately issued for search of boxes of records; should have argued possessory interest lost

OR: Telling the passenger to get out of the car is not a seizure

During a traffic stop, telling the passenger to get out of the car is not a seizure. State v. Leahey, 272 Ore. App. 766, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 961 (August 12, 2015). “He requested defendant’s identification, asked if she had … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Telling the passenger to get out of the car is not a seizure

MA: Def was in CODIS four times; first might be illegal but rest were attenuated

Defendant contended that a 2000 blood sample that ended up in CODIS that connected him in a cold case hit was unreasonably obtained. However, he also had three other samples in the system that were not because of his convictions … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, DNA, Exclusionary rule, Racial profiling, Seizure | Comments Off on MA: Def was in CODIS four times; first might be illegal but rest were attenuated

CA: A police car pulling behind a car with emergency lights on is a stop

A police car pulling behind a car with emergency lights on is a stop. One can’t refuse to pull over and just keep going. Here, the officer was investigating a domestic complaint, and the stop was justified. Reasonable suspicion developed … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA: A police car pulling behind a car with emergency lights on is a stop

UT: RS not required before a knock-and-talk

Officers do not need reasonable suspicion to conduct a knock-and-talk. Defendant’s consent to enter wasn’t involuntary because he thought he couldn’t refuse because he was on probation. State v. Fretheim, 2015 UT App 197, 2015 Utah App. LEXIS 206 (August … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and talk, Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on UT: RS not required before a knock-and-talk

AK: Emergency exception applied to state trooper’s entry several hours after being called because of the remoteness of the location

This case was a domestic shooting in rural Alaska. Tribal officers were called, and they called for the State Troopers who were far better trained in crime scene preservation and homicide investigation. Their later entry was still under the emergency … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on AK: Emergency exception applied to state trooper’s entry several hours after being called because of the remoteness of the location

CA1: Gaming machines outside casinos also highly regulated industry by state law

Gaming machines outside casinos in Puerto Rico, Adult Entertainment Machines, are within a scheme of highly regulated businesses, as is gambling there in general, for the purposes of Burger. Therefore, the Commonwealth was within its power to inspect and seize … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Seizure | Comments Off on CA1: Gaming machines outside casinos also highly regulated industry by state law

NE: A stop merely to gather information about a week-old crime was unreasonable

Defendant was stopped to gather information from him about something he allegedly witnessed a week earlier, and he ended up getting arrested for DUI. Lidster and other roadblock cases are discussed, and they don’t apply. The information gathering stop was … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on NE: A stop merely to gather information about a week-old crime was unreasonable