TX1: No standing to challenge seizure of ketamine off co-def, but PC was lacking for his own arrest

Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the seizure of ketamine off a codefendant. [Even better for him,] There was no probable cause for his warrantless arrest. Akinrinlola v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4935 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) May 28, 2026).*

Defendant’s regularly visiting a drug trap house confirmed by surveillance and GPS information and further confirmed by his having keys to the building on his person was constructive possession. United States v. Crumpton, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 14793 (6th Cir. May 22, 2026).*

Defendant’s charged with worker’s comp fraud, and a warrant was obtained for his cell phone. His Franks challenge fails: “Off the bat, the Court disagrees with Defendant that the Affidavit contains any misstatement at all.” United States v. Murphy, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114121 (S.D.N.Y. May 22, 2026).*

In a child sexual abuse case, defendant’s in house video recording system was seized under a warrant. State v. Gadbois, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 285 (May 19, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.