Category Archives: Cell phones

E.D.Mich.: Civil Franks violation was “well established” and QI denied

Plaintiff was arrested for child sexual abuse. The child recanted, and the prosecutor involved was disbarred for misconduct in this case. Plaintiff’s claim for a Franks violation was well established by 1978, and qualified immunity denied. MacMaster v. Busacca, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Civil Franks violation was “well established” and QI denied

N.D.Ohio: Alleged mishandling of drugs during execution of SW didn’t make them inadmissible

Even if the officers (mis)handled the drugs during the search, they’d still come into evidence at trial. United States v. McDonald, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11844 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 22, 2025). The trial court suppressed this cell phone search as … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Alleged mishandling of drugs during execution of SW didn’t make them inadmissible

D.C.Cir.: Compelling defendant to unlock his phone was a 5A testimonial act

Compelling defendant to unlock his phone was a testimonial act under Hubbell, and it had to be suppressed. (Deciding the Fifth Amendment claim moots need to decide the Fourth Amendment claim.) United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1219 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Compelling defendant to unlock his phone was a 5A testimonial act

D.Ariz.: USPO can turn phone seized in supervised release over to FBI

It was not improper for the PO to turn defendant’s phone over to the FBI to search it when it was already lawfully seized. “This is not a stalking horse case.” The delay was not unreasonable. United States v. Fuller, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: USPO can turn phone seized in supervised release over to FBI

CA10: Parole supervisor could conduct parole search

The fact a parole supervisor conducted the parole search and not a “parole officer” doesn’t make the parole search unreasonable. United States v. Barron, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 258 (10th Cir. Jan. 7, 2025). Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is more … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA10: Parole supervisor could conduct parole search

OR: REP in cell phone lost when it was loaned to another

Defendant waived any reasonable expectation of privacy in this smartphone by loaning it to another [even under Oregon’s more stringent abandonment standards]. Here, it was completely out of his control because he loaned it to a young woman, and her … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: REP in cell phone lost when it was loaned to another

E.D.Mo.: Even though threatened with obstruction if he didn’t, defendant consented to seizure of cell phone

The officer had probable cause to believe defendant took a video of a young girl in his house in the bathtub. Defendant was persuaded to turn over the phone and it was consensual. He was told that he might be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Voluntariness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Even though threatened with obstruction if he didn’t, defendant consented to seizure of cell phone

MT: Cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable

This cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable. State v. LeDeau, 2024 MT 305 (Dec. 17, 2024). Plaintiff makes numerous claims against a city short term rental ordinance, including a Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on MT: Cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable

OH10: Suicidal domestic call followed by ShotSpotter alert was RS

Police had a call about a domestic situation with a suicidal man with a gun. Shortly thereafter, there was a ShotSpotter alert of 20 gunshots from a house nearby. Officers arrived and patted down those found there. This is substantially … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Suicidal domestic call followed by ShotSpotter alert was RS

NY3: “Common sense” that a drug dealer might have evidence on his cell phone isn’t PC

Just because defendant was a suspected drug dealer, there wasn’t probable cause for searching his cell phone. “While [officer] Bruno recounted that there was a quantity of drugs found in the motel room, along with the two phones, he did … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY3: “Common sense” that a drug dealer might have evidence on his cell phone isn’t PC

D.Mass.: Copying electronic device for delayed search is not per se unreasonable

In an electronic search, the government copied the device’s memory for later search, and the probable cause did not get stale during the delay. Because of the capacity of electronic devices, this is the most efficient manner of searching. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Copying electronic device for delayed search is not per se unreasonable

E.D.Mich.: PC and nexus to cell phone shown by drug deal arranged on an app

Probable cause and a nexus to defendant’s phone was shown because of arranging drug transactions through its apps. United States v. Hughes, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219482 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024). Probable cause didn’t have to be decided because … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC and nexus to cell phone shown by drug deal arranged on an app

E.D.Wis.: Ptf’s claim judge’s signature on SW was forged fails for not even alleging there was a search

“The plaintiff similarly alleges that Miller forged a judge’s signature on a search warrant. But he does not say anything else about this search warrant. Did law enforcement execute the search warrant? What, or where, did they search? Did they … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Ptf’s claim judge’s signature on SW was forged fails for not even alleging there was a search

Leftovers

2255 petitioner fails to show grounds for a CoA from his search claims, without telling us the rationale. United States v. Renteria, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30239 (5th Cir. Nov. 26, 2024).* Defendant’s stop and frisk was without reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Stop and frisk, Strip search | Comments Off on Leftovers

D.Or.: Taking iPhone 6 apart and putting new firmware to make it work wasn’t a “search” for information

Taking an iPhone 6 apart, putting it back together, and installing new firmware to make it work was not a “search” because that process was not to obtain information. [Well, that was the ultimate goal, wasn’t it?] United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on D.Or.: Taking iPhone 6 apart and putting new firmware to make it work wasn’t a “search” for information

CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

Defendant chose to go pro se at the suppression hearing, grudgingly accepting standby counsel. After the motion to suppress was denied, he claimed ineffective assistance by standby counsel for not doing more. But that’s not standby counsel’s role. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Pro se def’s standby counsel not ineffective at suppression hearing; not counsel’s role

techdirt: Two Missouri Cops Are Facing Criminal Charges For Helping Themselves To Nude Photos Found On Drivers’ Phones

techdirt: Two Missouri Cops Are Facing Criminal Charges For Helping Themselves To Nude Photos Found On Drivers’ Phones by Tim Cushing, updating this post from 11/15

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on techdirt: Two Missouri Cops Are Facing Criminal Charges For Helping Themselves To Nude Photos Found On Drivers’ Phones

LA5: Defense attorney’s email about evidence on phone not protected by attorney-client privilege

A defense attorney’s email about evidence on a cell phone was used to get authority to search and seize the phone. Defendant claimed privilege; the state claimed that defense counsel was obligated to turn over material evidence. It was not … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on LA5: Defense attorney’s email about evidence on phone not protected by attorney-client privilege

NBC: 2 Missouri officers accused of stealing nude photos from dozens of women’s phones at traffic stops

NBC: 2 Missouri officers accused of stealing nude photos from dozens of women’s phones at traffic stops by Austin Mullen and Doha Madani (“Two former Missouri officers were charged in separate, unconnected cases in federal court this week over allegations … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on NBC: 2 Missouri officers accused of stealing nude photos from dozens of women’s phones at traffic stops

W.D.N.Y.: The fact the issuing magistrate read fast didn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached

The fact the issuing magistrate had to read 65 pages in 21 minutes doesn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached. “The Court is not persuaded by Defendant’s assessment of Judge Morrison’s reading speed, which relies wholly on speculation.” United States … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: The fact the issuing magistrate read fast didn’t mean he wasn’t neutral and detached