Category Archives: Consent

NY2: Justified search for mj didn’t justify looking at credit cards for forgery

The officer here could open a zippered pouch looking for marijuana, but he could not look at the credit cards inside to see if they were fraudulent. “On this record, Officer Zaleski’s discovery of three credit cards stacked inside a … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY2: Justified search for mj didn’t justify looking at credit cards for forgery

E.D.Cal.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a contraband cell phone found on him in prison. The contents of the phone were used in a drug distribution indictment. The government got a search warrant for the contents of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: No REP in a contraband cell phone in prison

TX1: Voluntariness of consent shown by officers’ efforts to insure def understood what they were asking

The record supports the trial court’s finding of consent. Neither officer exhibited a firearm, spoke in a harsh or loud tone, or indicated to defendant that he could not leave. Instead, both officers were trying to help defendant understand what … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Waiver | Comments Off on TX1: Voluntariness of consent shown by officers’ efforts to insure def understood what they were asking

WA: Request for proof of payment of a bus fare is not a search

Request for proof of payment of a public transportation fare is not a seizure under the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. Defendant consented to the terms of ridership by boarding the bus, which included paying the fare and having … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Search, Seizure | Comments Off on WA: Request for proof of payment of a bus fare is not a search

S.D.Fla.: PC for constructive possession shown; def doesn’t have to handle firearm in video

There was probable cause for defendant’s constructive possession of a firearm. The government didn’t have to show he was in actual possession for probable cause. He also presumably knew he had a prior conviction to support his being a felon … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: PC for constructive possession shown; def doesn’t have to handle firearm in video

S.D.Ga.: SW for this motel room wasn’t stale after two days

While a search warrant for a motel room, a more transient place than a home, might get stale faster, this one didn’t considering the nature of the allegations. “[B]ased on the totality of the circumstances, the evidence was not stale … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: SW for this motel room wasn’t stale after two days

ND: Backpack removed from car before dog sniff couldn’t be searched based on dog’s alert on car

Probable cause was lacking to search a backpack removed from a vehicle shortly after the stop but before the dog alerted on the car. Search incident also did not apply: “In the absence of either a concern for officer safety, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Search incident | Comments Off on ND: Backpack removed from car before dog sniff couldn’t be searched based on dog’s alert on car

N.D.Iowa: Asking “What’s going on?” was not withdrawal of consent

The court adopts the R&R finding on the totality that defendant consented to a search of his backpack, despite some intoxication. His saying “What’s going on?” was not withdrawal of consent. United States v. Harden, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126242 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Foreign searches, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Asking “What’s going on?” was not withdrawal of consent

CA1: Direct evidence and indirect inferences showed PC

“Lindsey argues that there was no probable cause to believe there was evidence of drug dealing on the cellphones because the affidavit offered ‘no direct evidence’ that the phones would contain evidence of any drug dealing and the ‘indirect’ evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA1: Direct evidence and indirect inferences showed PC

D.Ore.: 3 min. wait for backup here did not unreasonably extend traffic stop

Three minute wait for backup officer to arrive did not unreasonably extend the stop based on the articulated justification: “Officer Carney called and waited for a cover officer so that he could safely carry out the mission of the traffic … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Ore.: 3 min. wait for backup here did not unreasonably extend traffic stop

Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

Defendant’s consent to search his apartment was obtained after telling him that it was based on the death of his roommate in the parking lot. He was in “custody,” and this was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority. “In … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on Army: Consent to search was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority

E.D.Mich.: Even with redactions, SW affidavit shows PC

Redacted search warrant application showed probable cause even with redactions. United States v. Rivers, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104195 (E.D. Mich. June 3, 2021). The officer had called for a tow truck for defendant’s car and an inventory was inevitable, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Even with redactions, SW affidavit shows PC

D.Md.: State’s DoIT owns and controls state computers and can enter computers and offices for access; no REP in state computer

The State of Maryland’s Department of Information Technology owns and controls the computers on its network and has the authority to enter offices to enter computers. Here, child pornography was found. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Md.: State’s DoIT owns and controls state computers and can enter computers and offices for access; no REP in state computer

CA9: Body cam video of unreasonable warrantless entry to house should have been suppressed; but harmless

The warrantless entry into defendant’s house and body cam recording of him violated the Fourth Amendment. The other evidence, however, was overwhelming, so was harmless. United States v. Holiday, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 15884 (9th Cir. May 27, 2021). Where … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Particularity | Comments Off on CA9: Body cam video of unreasonable warrantless entry to house should have been suppressed; but harmless

CO: Prescription bottles in car door weren’t subject to plain view search

There was no justification for officers to pull prescription bottles from the door of his car during a traffic stop and manipulate them. Plain view didn’t support the seizure and search because the incriminating nature wasn’t immediately apparent even on … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CO: Prescription bottles in car door weren’t subject to plain view search

D.N.J.: Owner of house consented to search of guest’s room

The consenter had control over the entire premises defendant was visiting, and that included the bedroom he was staying in. It was reasonable for the officers to believe he had control over the entire premises. Moreover, defendant didn’t object to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Owner of house consented to search of guest’s room

NY, Bronx: A tracking warrant isn’t an eavesdropping warrant

Defendant had standing to challenge a tracking warrant on his phone despite the state’s claim that wasn’t the cause for his arrest. He was tracked. These were not eavesdropping warrants. “Because the location information provided pursuant to the warrant did … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Qualified immunity, Standing, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on NY, Bronx: A tracking warrant isn’t an eavesdropping warrant

TX14: Broad consent to search home included surveillance system

A broad consent to search a home includes the surveillance system. Hart v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 3784 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) May 13, 2021). “Considering that knowledge of the ability to refuse consent is not a … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Nexus, Scope of search | Comments Off on TX14: Broad consent to search home included surveillance system

TX13: Truck mechanic conducted private search of flash drive found in door

Defendant took his pickup truck in for service at the local Ford dealer. While working on the truck, the mechanic found a flash drive in the door pocket and plugged it into the diagnostic laptop plugged into defendant’s truck. Instead … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Nexus, Private search | Comments Off on TX13: Truck mechanic conducted private search of flash drive found in door

NY2: Def’s driving over officer’s legs and ankles was attenuated from his alleged illegal stop

Defendant driving over the officer’s legs and ankles was attenuated from his alleged illegal stop. People v. Contreras, 2021 NY Slip Op 03048, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3144 (2d Dept. May 12, 2021). “The County Court properly found that … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, Good faith exception, Waiver | Comments Off on NY2: Def’s driving over officer’s legs and ankles was attenuated from his alleged illegal stop