Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

D.Mont.: Search incident doctrine didn’t apply where car was searched when def was transported to ER

Officers lacked reasonable suspicion for a probation search of defendant’s vehicle. In addition, its search couldn’t be justified by search incident when he was already transported to the hospital before the search occurred. United States v. Heafner, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Search incident doctrine didn’t apply where car was searched when def was transported to ER

VI: Multiple falsities about CI made successful Franks challenge

Defendant succeeded in his Franks challenge on misleading statements about the CI as an observer rather than participant in the crime and the affidavit lacked corroborating investigative facts and omitted information about W1’s lies. All this was material to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on VI: Multiple falsities about CI made successful Franks challenge

CA9: Deleting email account to avoid SW was obstruction

Defendant deleting his email account to avoid a search warrant supported an obstruction conviction. United States v. Diaz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1459 (9th Cir. Jan. 23, 2025). Defendant was stopped in a high crime area without reasonable suspicion. There … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Deleting email account to avoid SW was obstruction

D.Nev.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply before grand juries

Calandra revisited [and I haven’t seen it since Calandra]: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply before grand juries. United States v. Jones, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11132 (D. Nev. Jan. 21, 2025). The search warrant was based on two controlled buys plus … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply before grand juries

CA5: Where place to be searched appeared to be one residence, not two, SW valid

The search warrant was for 8977 Deer Trail Run, but it turned out to be two properties. “From all outward appearances there was only one property, not two. The officers acted in objectively reasonable good faith in relying on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA5: Where place to be searched appeared to be one residence, not two, SW valid

FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

Newer cases hold that a drug dog can’t differentiate between legal and illegal marijuana, so a dog alert doesn’t provide probable cause. Where the dog sniff occurred before that holding, however, it was reasonable under the good faith exception. Ford … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

M.D.Tenn.: Five-month-old information about CP on a Pinterest account not stale

There was probable cause for this child pornography warrant. Information about a Pinterest account that was five months old was not stale, and the images were adequately identified. United States v. Lynch, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2633 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Five-month-old information about CP on a Pinterest account not stale

CA4: Ditching backpack when hiding from police was abandonment

Defendant abandoned his backpack when he ditched it in a motel stairwell when he was fleeing the police. United States v. Mayberry, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 300 (4th Cir. Jan. 7, 2025). Leaving one’s backpack and a trashbag in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA4: Ditching backpack when hiding from police was abandonment

S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure

“In sum, defendant is not entitled to credit against his sentence for time spent under home confinement as a condition of his bail release. Further, defendant’s time spent on home confinement did not constitute a seizure of his person under … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure

N.D.Miss.: ER staff’s search of def’s clothes was private search

Defendant was taken to the ER for gunshot wounds. The hospital staff took his clothes and looked in his pockets and then turned them over to the police. This was a private search. United States v. Coleman, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: ER staff’s search of def’s clothes was private search

D.P.R.: Honest mistake in affidavit attempted to be corrected but no Franks violation here

The search warrant was in the S.D. Tex., and the affiant found a mistake before it was finalized that he communicated to the AUSAs involved. The correction, however, wasn’t made before he signed it, and he didn’t notice it. When … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Honest mistake in affidavit attempted to be corrected but no Franks violation here

D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

“Here, Jackson appears to have denied any possessory interest in the SUV and the backpack. (Dkt. 22 ¶ 7 (‘Jackson was not the registered owner of the vehicle. He further claims all of the items in the vehicle and the … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Disavowing ownership of the thing seized means no standing

NC: Drug dog alert on def’s car isn’t RS to frisk his person

A drug dog alert on defendant’s car isn’t reasonable suspicion to frisk his person. State v. Stollings, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 1006 (Dec. 17, 2024). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not further challenging the search warrant issued after an entry … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Drug dog alert on def’s car isn’t RS to frisk his person

CA6: 4A IAC claim requires a showing petitioner would win on the merits of search claim

“And if Derringer intended to argue that counsel should have moved to suppress the cell phone videos, he did not identify any basis for challenging the validity of the search warrant that resulted in the seizure of the cell phone … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: 4A IAC claim requires a showing petitioner would win on the merits of search claim

E.D.Cal.: Successor habeas petition can’t be based on withheld information of a 4A violation

A successor habeas can’t be based on allegedly withheld evidence of a Fourth Amendment violation. Sanchez v. Cates, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226067 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2024). Defendant can’t show that defense counsel was ineffective for not moving to … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Successor habeas petition can’t be based on withheld information of a 4A violation

ND: Calling 911 about OD’g child in your house is exigency for entry

Calling 911 that the child you’re caring for OD’ed on your fentanyl is consent to their emergency entry. State v. Gothberg, 2024 ND 217, 2024 N.D. LEXIS 221 (Dec. 5, 2024). 2255 petitioner pled guilty knowing the facts of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on ND: Calling 911 about OD’g child in your house is exigency for entry

W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not arguing that state law was violated by the search in his federal case. Clark v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219107 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2024).* Defense counsel could not be ineffective … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: State law violation in search irrelevant in federal prosecution

MO: Def’s 4A ineffective assistance claim fails because he doesn’t show he’d prevail on the 4A claim

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim was based on defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress of a marital vehicle. He never, however, showed that he did, in fact, have standing. Moreover, the trial court found that the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on MO: Def’s 4A ineffective assistance claim fails because he doesn’t show he’d prevail on the 4A claim

CA11: No prejudice for failing to file motion to suppress drug def was acquitted of

2254 petitioner can’t show prejudice from defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress cocaine when he was acquitted of that charge. Zayas-Acosta v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30236 (11th Cir. Nov. 27, 2024). Challenge … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA11: No prejudice for failing to file motion to suppress drug def was acquitted of

FL6: Def confesses error that his motion to suppress abandoned property shouldn’t have been granted

Defendant moved to suppress something he threw away in flight from the police, and the trial court granted it. On appeal, he confesses error that it was abandoned. Reversed. State v. Howard, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 9246 (Fla. 6th DCA … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL6: Def confesses error that his motion to suppress abandoned property shouldn’t have been granted