Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

CA9: Boat tied to a dock is a vehicle for automobile exception even if someone lives on it

A boat tied to a dock is subject to the vehicle exception even if somebody lives on it. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 11866 (9th Cir. Apr. 24, 2026). Officers don’t have to piecemeal the exigency for … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA9: Boat tied to a dock is a vehicle for automobile exception even if someone lives on it

CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

Defendant lived on tribal lands with a co-occupant who was not Native American. Officers obtained two search warrants: one from a tribal court and one from a state court. The applications were identical. The state judge, however, wanted more information, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

CA5: Officer’s touching parent’s arm to get her through a school door for four seconds was de minimis

In a school grounds dispute, a parent’s arm was grabbed for four seconds to move her through a doorway. “Under the circumstances, we cannot say that such de minimis force was ‘clearly’ excessive and unreasonable. … Dupuy knew that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Officer’s touching parent’s arm to get her through a school door for four seconds was de minimis

N.D.Ohio: Where 1 of 10 officers in a search wore a bodycam, that doesn’t mean the others couldn’t be credible

“Harris also questions the ‘credibility’ of the officers executing the search warrant because only 1 out of 10 officers … wore a body camera at any point during the search. But other than generalized complaints about the lack of body … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Where 1 of 10 officers in a search wore a bodycam, that doesn’t mean the others couldn’t be credible

CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

Search warrant for a gun in defendant’s house allegedly involved in a road rage incident three weeks earlier was not stale. United States v. Becker, 168 F.4th 1337 (10th Cir. Mar. 9, 2026). Defendant’s December 2019 conviction is affirmed. Reviewing … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

Plaintiff student’s cell phone was properly searched at school under T.L.O. when he was heard bragging about having explicit photographs on it at school. O.W. v. Carr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10241 (4th Cir. Apr. 9, 2026). Plaintiff made a … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

S.D.N.Y.: Constant surveillance of a car not needed for PC

There was probable cause for search of an Uber for drugs based on police surveillance. Defendant’s mention of supposed gaps in surveillance don’t mitigate the probable cause. “Their lack of an airtight case against the defendant, at the time of … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Independent source, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Constant surveillance of a car not needed for PC

OH8: Seeing gun magazine justified protective sweep of car for gun it could belong to

Defendant was pulled over and officers could see the magazine to a gun. They asked if he had a gun in the car and he said “I don’t admit to that.” He said it was home. He was a known … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH8: Seeing gun magazine justified protective sweep of car for gun it could belong to

W.D.Wis.: Failure to cross a trial witness about a search claim isn’t IAC

Failure to cross-examine a trial witness about a potential Fourth Amendment violation is not ineffective assistance of counsel because a jury trial is not the place to resolve a search claim. Kawleski v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70540 … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Failure to cross a trial witness about a search claim isn’t IAC

S.D.Ind.: No IAC for not better arguing GFE

Failure to better confront the good faith exception before conviction wasn’t ineffective assistance. Ramirez-Prado v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68941 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 31, 2026):

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: No IAC for not better arguing GFE

CA9: First cell phone warrant was issued day after seizure; second a year later wasn’t unreasonable

The day after defendant’s cell phone was seized, the government obtained a search warrant for it, and the warrant had a 90-day execution provision. Defendant concedes probable cause. The fact it took a year before a second warrant for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA9: First cell phone warrant was issued day after seizure; second a year later wasn’t unreasonable

S.D.Fla.: Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception

The Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception. Madaio v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64418 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 26, 2026). When defendant was stopped, the officers had reasonable suspicion the car had been involved in a shooting … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception

RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

Defendant wasn’t prejudiced by defense counsel not moving to suppress DNA off a blanket found on a road when he’d stipulated to it being his DNA. [There’s also an obvious abandonment issue not even mentioned.] Tassone v. State, 2026 R.I. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Nexus | Comments Off on RI: Trial stipulation DNA on blanket was def’s obviates search claim

D.N.M.: Climbing over a locked gate to do a knock-and-talk violated curtilage, but QI applies

Climbing over a locked gate to do a knock-and-talk violated curtilage, but qualified immunity applies because the law isn’t clearly established. Dotson v. Acord, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57749 (D.N.M. Mar. 19, 2026). Plaintiff runs a wildlife rehab place, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Climbing over a locked gate to do a knock-and-talk violated curtilage, but QI applies

MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

Police seized defendant’s cell phone and sought to have it examined. It went into the queue at the forensic unit, and, when it was ready to be searched, they then sought a warrant. They waited because they believed there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MD: Waiting 20 days to get cell phone SW after seizure was reasonable here

MD: No IAC where def counsel reasonably concluded 4A lacked merit

Defense counsel made reasonable choices not to pursue two Fourth Amendment challenges because it was likely that they’d lose. Williams v. State, 2026 Md. App. LEXIS 288 (Mar. 17, 2026)* (unreported):

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on MD: No IAC where def counsel reasonably concluded 4A lacked merit

D.Kan.: SW application with expired notary stamp doesn’t violate 4A

A search warrant application that was notarized with an expired notary stamp was not a Fourth Amendment violation. McAlister v. Kansas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55139 (D. Kan. Mar. 17, 2026). 2255 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on D.Kan.: SW application with expired notary stamp doesn’t violate 4A

N.D.Ohio: Violating retail store’s “no firearms” prohibition was RS for stop

Defendant’s violating a “no firearms” prohibition at a retail establishment was reasonable suspicion for his stop for trespassing. United States v. Sinkfield, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54823 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2026). To succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Violating retail store’s “no firearms” prohibition was RS for stop

N.D.Tex.: Room searches in center for sexually violent predators same as a prison cell search

Plaintiff is sexually violent predator confined in the Texas Civil Commitment Center. Room searches there are governed by the same rationale as prison cell searches. Welsh v. Pearson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50445 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2026). Even if … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Room searches in center for sexually violent predators same as a prison cell search

NYCo.: Arrests can’t be suppressed

“Defendant was charged with committing specific acts of violence against an identifiable person, who reported the incident. An arrest itself cannot be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree, and defendant himself was not a suppressible fruit. Nor was he … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NYCo.: Arrests can’t be suppressed