Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

S.D.Tex.: Carpenter applies to a 2015 CSLI application because the case is still pending

Carpenter applies to defendant’s CSLI because his case is still pending despite the fact the CSLI was obtained in 2015. Suppressed. United States v. Beverly, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183539 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2018). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Carpenter applies to a 2015 CSLI application because the case is still pending

CA10: In a Carpenter remand, court remands to Dist.Ct. instead of applying GFE

This case was GVR’d after Carpenter, and the court remands to the district court to make further findings. United States v. Thompson, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 29949 (10th Cir. Oct. 24, 2018). Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not filing … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA10: In a Carpenter remand, court remands to Dist.Ct. instead of applying GFE

ME: First blood draw was potentially contaminated, so second was valid under exigent circumstances

The state showed by a preponderance of the evidence that there were exigent circumstances for a warrantless blood draw. Natural dissipation of alcohol alone is not an exigency under McNealy. The first blood draw was potentially contaminated, so a second … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on ME: First blood draw was potentially contaminated, so second was valid under exigent circumstances

W.D.Va.: Def counsel’s decision not to pursue a motion to suppress was reasonable and designed to prevent superseding indictment with higher MM

Defense counsel’s decision not to pursue a motion to suppress was reasonable under the circumstances. Defendant was already facing a 60 month minimum. The government made clear that they had additional counts they could bring but wouldn’t if the defense … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Def counsel’s decision not to pursue a motion to suppress was reasonable and designed to prevent superseding indictment with higher MM

N.D.Ind.: Court can’t exclude for knock-and-announce failure

Failure to properly knock-and-announce is foreclosed as a reason for exclusion under Hudson v. Michigan. United States v. Calligan, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173193 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 9, 2018). 2255 petitioner was not prejudiced by defense counsel’s failure to challenge … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Knock and announce, Overseizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Court can’t exclude for knock-and-announce failure

TX: No IAC for def counsel not forecasting change in 4A law

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not forecasting McNeeley before defendant’s guilty plea. “When a defendant waives the right to have a jury determine guilt or innocence and admits or does not contest guilt, the defendant does so under the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX: No IAC for def counsel not forecasting change in 4A law

CA7: In a wiretap application, only def’s nickname was sufficient when PC is shown

Defendant on a wiretap application was only known by his nickname, and this did nothing to alter the probable cause analysis nor undermine probable cause. United States v. Santiago, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 27919 (7th Cir. Oct. 2, 2018) (there’s … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA7: In a wiretap application, only def’s nickname was sufficient when PC is shown

CA11: Not calling def at suppression hearing was [a founded] strategy decision

Defense counsel’s decision not to call the defendant or other witnesses at a suppression hearing was a strategy decision not subject to second guessing except in extraordinary circumstances. Defense counsel concluded they lacked credibility. Here, defendant testified at trial to … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Not calling def at suppression hearing was [a founded] strategy decision

S.D.Ga.: Being bumped by a police car and fleeing three more miles wasn’t a seizure

Defendant wasn’t seized by being bumped by police car because he went another three miles without stopping. “Moreover, the Eleventh Circuit and courts across different circuits have concluded that no seizure occurs where police attempt to stop a fleeing vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Being bumped by a police car and fleeing three more miles wasn’t a seizure

N.D.Ill.: No IAC for not challenging CSLI without warrant before Carpenter

Defendant didn’t get ineffective assistance of counsel from defense counsel not challenging warrantless CSLI production without a warrant before Carpenter. United States v. Lewisbey, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165566 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 27, 2018). Defendant claimed for the first time … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: No IAC for not challenging CSLI without warrant before Carpenter

N.D.Ohio: Parole officers’ clinical reports didn’t have any of the added color at the suppression hearing, so the court doesn’t credit their testimony

“Based upon the totality of the circumstances and the Court’s assessment of the credibility of the parole officers, the Court finds that the [parole authority] lacked reasonable suspicion to search Neff’s cell phone. The results of the search, therefore, must … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Parole officers’ clinical reports didn’t have any of the added color at the suppression hearing, so the court doesn’t credit their testimony

N.D.Okla.: Arrest inside the door permitted protective sweep

The arrest of the codefendant inside house permitted a protective sweep. United States v. Jones, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166347 (N.D. Okla. Sep. 27, 2018). “These nine ineffective assistance of counsel claims are properly evaluated under the Strickland standard, meaning … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Arrest inside the door permitted protective sweep