Category Archives: Franks doctrine

CA6: Student not entitled to warning before school search

The search of this student was reasonable, and the student had no right to be warned before it was going to happen. Halasz v. Cass City Pub. Sch., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 33093 (6th Cir. Dec. 18, 2025). There was … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, School searches | Comments Off on CA6: Student not entitled to warning before school search

NC: No standing in someone else’s cell phone pinged to find defendant

Defendant used someone else’s cell phone and officers pinged it to find him. He had no standing for the borrowed phone. After arrest, he admitted the shooting in a jail call. “Defendant’s temporary use of the phone does not automatically … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NC: No standing in someone else’s cell phone pinged to find defendant

WI: “the end of a romantic relationship does not automatically terminate shared authority when the partner continues to access or use the property”

“The fact that Klein expressed anger toward A.V. and moved some of her belongings outside does not establish that her residential status had ended. He did not finish removing her possessions, he permitted her inside, and her household items remained … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on WI: “the end of a romantic relationship does not automatically terminate shared authority when the partner continues to access or use the property”

CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

The officer’s handling defendant’s suitcase on a Greyhound Bus for five seconds to remove it from the bus, just as the driver or baggage handlers would, before asking him for consent was not unreasonable. Defendant validly consented to its search. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

W.D.Ky.: A ruse arrest is legal in CA6

Police using a ruse to arrest defendant is legal in the Sixth Circuit. (Not necessarily in the Ninth, but we’re in the Sixth.) It also doesn’t “shock the conscious [sic, quoting a pleading].” United States v. Carmona, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: A ruse arrest is legal in CA6

W.D.Wash.: PC was shown for cell phone data for particular number and any number switched to, if provider knows it

Probable cause was shown for phone records for both the number sought and any number the provider knew that the owner had changed to, even without identifying it. And, good faith applied: “Therefore, even if the continuity provision within the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: PC was shown for cell phone data for particular number and any number switched to, if provider knows it

E.D.Tenn.: Def had standing in sister’s car he bought for her she let him drive

Defendant bought his sister her vehicle and she permitted him to drive it. He had standing to contest the stop. The stop was justified and reasonable in scope. United States v. Tillery, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235323 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def had standing in sister’s car he bought for her she let him drive

D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

The use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial. United States v. Blythe, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231852 (D.D.C. Nov. 23, 2025) (interesting read). Just because defense counsel didn’t appeal a losing Fourth Amendment issue doesn’t make … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Privileges | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

The drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl but alerted on it. It was trained on cocaine and did alert on it. That doesn’t make the dog unreliable. After probable cause developed, using the key fob to open the car wasn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

CA5: Overnight guest’s stuff subject to search under warrant for premises

Defendant was an overnight guest at the place searched, and the officers executing a warrant were authorized to search her stuff, too. United States v. Inyang, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30148 (5th Cir. Nov. 18, 2025). Undercover officer’s recording in … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA5: Overnight guest’s stuff subject to search under warrant for premises

KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

Under Kansas statute, only KHP officers can randomly stop regulated trucks for inspection, and it can’t be delegated to county sheriffs by an MOU. “There is no dispute here that regulation of commercial motor carriers triggers a substantial government interest.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Waiver | Comments Off on KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

S.D.Fla.: 16 shot ShotSpotter alert confirmed by witnesses was exigency to enter curtilage

A ShotSpotter alert of 16 gunshots from the vicinity of defendant’s home confirmed by witnesses in a car leaving the area was justification for exigent entry onto the curtilage. “Since the addition of the omitted information does not disturb the … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: 16 shot ShotSpotter alert confirmed by witnesses was exigency to enter curtilage

D.D.C.: Govt failed to prove area was “high crime” based on nine gun seizures in four months

When challenged, the government fails to prove that the area of the stop was “high crime.” There were nine gun seizures in four months in a 500 meter radius. “The Government has established, however, that Abass engaged in unprovoked and … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Govt failed to prove area was “high crime” based on nine gun seizures in four months

FL4: Welfare check entry valid despite mixed motives

A welfare check that is objectively reasonable isn’t unreasonable because of a mixed motive to arrest if necessary. State v. Leiby, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 8339 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 5, 2025). The police had (plenty) of probable cause to … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL4: Welfare check entry valid despite mixed motives

E.D.N.Y.: No standing in husband’s cell phone searched in Syria; no REP in NCEM database

“Defendant Halima Salman is charged with receiving military type training from a foreign terrorist organization in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2339D.” The government maintains a database of who is involved in military activities overseas: NMEC. Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: No standing in husband’s cell phone searched in Syria; no REP in NCEM database

E.D.N.Y.: Some assistance to foreign police under MLAT doesn’t require suppression

Defendants are accused to a cocaine conspiracy of trafficking from South America to Europe through the US. The government obtained information from European counties via MLAT, and whatever assistance they gave to help gather information didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Some assistance to foreign police under MLAT doesn’t require suppression

DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

Defendant was not denied confrontation of the CI who took photographs of his property used to get the search warrant. When the state offered them at trial, defendant successfully objected, so there was nothing to confront. State v. McCurdy, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

The forensic search of a cell phone can occur anytime between seizure and trial and still be timely. State v. Lowry, 2025 La. LEXIS 1481 (La. Oct. 25, 2025). 2255 ineffective assistance of counsel challenge for Franks violation fails for … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA: Forensic search of cell phone can occur any time before trial

A prosecution of a police officer for perjury during a Franks hearing

United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203218 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 15, 2025) involved prosecution of a police officer for perjury during a Franks hearing:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on A prosecution of a police officer for perjury during a Franks hearing

OH5: Typo on SW date could be overlooked if it can be otherwise figured out

The warrant said without the blanks filled in: “‘Sworn to and subscribed in my presence this ___ day of August 2024. Time ___.’ The warrant also contained a partially pre-filled date line which read ‘Dated this ___ day of August … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Typo on SW date could be overlooked if it can be otherwise figured out