Category Archives: Good faith exception

S.D.N.Y.: Copying cell phone at border was unreasonable, but GFE and a later SW saved it

Defendant’s cell phone was copied when he came back to Newark airport after a flight to Jamaica. “As such, the Court concludes that the Government may not copy and search an American citizen’s cell phone at the border without a … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Good faith exception | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Copying cell phone at border was unreasonable, but GFE and a later SW saved it

N.D.Ill.: Passenger in car had standing to challenge search of his own bag during stop

Defendant had standing to challenge the search of his own bag when he was riding in someone else’s car. The protective sweep of the car, however, was based on reasonable suspicion and finding an ammunition box was plain view. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Passenger in car had standing to challenge search of his own bag during stop

NY Albany: SW’s problematic time limits support severability

The time limits on the scope of the warrant are problematic, but severable. People v. Williams, 2023 NY Slip Op 23137, 2023 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2165 (Albany Co. May 8, 2023).* In a sex trafficking case, probable cause was shown … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY Albany: SW’s problematic time limits support severability

MN: Purse in car could be searched under automobile exception

The warrantless search of defendant’s purse was lawful under the automobile exception because there was probable cause to believe that the car contained a controlled substance, and the purse was a container within that car. State v. Barrow, 2023 Minn. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Scope of search | Comments Off on MN: Purse in car could be searched under automobile exception

NJ: Common authority to search a storage unit doesn’t necessarily include authority to search bags within

After a search warrant produced nothing, the domestic battery complainant had common authority to consent to a search of a storage trailer to seize weapons, but not to search the bags that the weapons were found in. “A third party’s … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Good faith exception, Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: Common authority to search a storage unit doesn’t necessarily include authority to search bags within

CO: Typo in date (9/9 v. 9/30) in SW affidavit could be overlooked by other contents referring to previous few hours; GFE also applies

The typographical error in the affidavit showing the date as September 9th when it should have been September 30th could be overlooked because the affidavit as a whole referred to the previous few hours, and the good faith exception applies. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CO: Typo in date (9/9 v. 9/30) in SW affidavit could be overlooked by other contents referring to previous few hours; GFE also applies

D.Kan.: “Indicia of ownership” in a SW not overbroad

Inclusion of “indicia of ownership” of the place searched doesn’t show the warrant was not particular. United States v. Anderson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73033 (D. Kan. Apr. 26, 2023). Defendant was stopped for a traffic violation, although there was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: “Indicia of ownership” in a SW not overbroad

D.Kan.: “The opening of the driver’s door had no effect or impact on the dog’s alert.”

“The opening of the driver’s door had no effect or impact on the dog’s alert.” United States v. Anderson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73033 (D. Kan. Apr. 26, 2023). The facts in the record support the automobile exception as the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Kan.: “The opening of the driver’s door had no effect or impact on the dog’s alert.”

AR: Suicide note and no answer at door justified exigent entry

Police responded to a call within minutes of a finding of a suicide note. “One officer called the on-call investigator after knocking on the door and getting no response. It was only then that the officers decided to breach the … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on AR: Suicide note and no answer at door justified exigent entry

D.Nev.: GFE does not save GPS tracking of additional driver of vehicle

Rubin, a regular driver of defendant’s pickup had standing to challenge a tracking warrant put on it. The issuing judge, however, appears only to have authorized the tracking of Morgan’s use. The court declines to apply the good faith exception. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Immigration checkpoints, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Nev.: GFE does not save GPS tracking of additional driver of vehicle

NACDL: 4 articles on electronic searches

Clare Harvie, What Defense Counsel Should Know About Facial Recognition Technology, 47 Champion 16 (No. 3, May 2023) Jennifer S. Granick, Marking Warrants Great Again: Avoiding General Searches in the Execution of Warrants for Electronic Data, 47 Champion 28 (No. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NACDL: 4 articles on electronic searches

D.Minn.: The affidavit for SW was somewhat conclusory, but the officer’s efforts to corrorobate the CI showed GF

Officers had probable cause for a Facebook tracking warrant to provide information of where he was when he posted about his travels south to acquire fentanyl for sale in Minnesota based on informant hearsay and his two pending drug cases. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The affidavit for SW was somewhat conclusory, but the officer’s efforts to corrorobate the CI showed GF

CA4: Slightly outdated information police gathered def lived at place in SW still made it in good faith

Officers gathered information that defendant’s son lived in his house and presented it for a search warrant. After the search they found out he didn’t. The warrant was still issued in good faith. United States v. Jordan, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on CA4: Slightly outdated information police gathered def lived at place in SW still made it in good faith

M.D.Fla.: Geofence SW decided on GFE alone

In this Hobbs Act robbery case, ATF got a geofence warrant to attempt to isolate who was committing a string of robberies in the Tampa Bay area. Instead of even considering the merits, the court goes directly to the good … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Geofence SW decided on GFE alone

Cal.2: Geofence warrant was a bit overbroad, but GFE still applies

A geofence warrant was sought in 2019 for Google which provided several subject phones in the vicinity of a murder. The court finds the warrant was not particular enough, but applies the good faith exception because geofence warrants were so … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, geofence, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on Cal.2: Geofence warrant was a bit overbroad, but GFE still applies

AR: Failure to argue against GFE below bars argument on appeal

Failure to challenge application of the good faith exception in the trial court on running the LPN through insurance database precludes challenging it on appeal. Erby v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 220, 2023 Ark. App. LEXIS 211 (April 12, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Failure to argue against GFE below bars argument on appeal

SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

As to the blood draw in this DUI death case, “We conclude section 56-5-2946 is facially constitutional but unconstitutional as applied in Appellant’s case. However, we find the trial court did not err in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress because … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

NY Orange Co.: Reasonableness of seizure of firearms under 2A and 4A depends on court order, due process, and objective showing of mental impairment

Following another county court, this one also holds that Second Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights are both fundamental and an order removing firearms must be based on finding of mental impairment and due process. R.M. v. C.M., 2023 NY Slip … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on NY Orange Co.: Reasonableness of seizure of firearms under 2A and 4A depends on court order, due process, and objective showing of mental impairment

CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

Mental health seizures under Florida’s Baker Act comply with the Fourth Amendment when it’s objectively reasonable to believe that the person is a danger to himself or others. Here the officers had that from defendant’s threats to shoot people. United … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Knock and announce, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video

The warrant here was particular enough. It didn’t just seek stolen property; it sought particular property stolen from the victim and clothing worn during the burglary caught on video. Williamson v. State, 2023 Miss. App. LEXIS 125 (Apr. 4, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video