Author Archives: Hall

NY4: Def proved IAC for failure to move to suppress cell phone search

Defendant satisfied his burden showing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in defense counsel’s failure to move to suppress his cell phone search. People v. Conley, 2025 NY Slip Op 00597 (4th Dept. Jan. 31, 2025).* The order suppressing … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY4: Def proved IAC for failure to move to suppress cell phone search

TN: Ptf’s actions at DV call justified officers’ greater force

The totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the domestic violence call, appellant’s armed presence near the scene, his rapid movement towards the officers while armed, and the short timeframe, made the officers’ use of deadly force objectively reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on TN: Ptf’s actions at DV call justified officers’ greater force

KS: Def voluntarily disclosed his cell phone passcode to the officers when the officer said he’d get a warrant

Defendant voluntarily disclosed his cell phone passcode to the officers when the officer said he’d get a warrant for it. State v. Harris, 2025 Kan. LEXIS 5 (Jan. 31, 2025):

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Voluntariness | Comments Off on KS: Def voluntarily disclosed his cell phone passcode to the officers when the officer said he’d get a warrant

ID: State completely failed to support justification for inventory

“The record is devoid of evidence to support the conclusion that Detective Uhrig’s decision to impound Smith’s car was reasonable under the circumstances.” The inventory depending on the legality of the impoundment. Reversed. State v. Smith, 2025 Ida. LEXIS 8 … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on ID: State completely failed to support justification for inventory

MS: Admitted “general crime control” roadblock still upheld based on part-time officer’s inexperience

While the officer in charge of the DL roadblock (highway safety) essentially admitted it was for general crime control (see Edmund v. City of Indianapolis), the court goes with the DUI arrest being valid. The officer “was the most inexperienced … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Roadblocks | Comments Off on MS: Admitted “general crime control” roadblock still upheld based on part-time officer’s inexperience

CA3: There is no REP in the exterior of a package in transit

The initial detention and exterior inspection of the parcel sent to defendant did not implicate his Fourth Amendment rights because it occurred within the guaranteed delivery window. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the exterior of the parcel … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Motion to suppress, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on CA3: There is no REP in the exterior of a package in transit

NY Erie Co.: State prosecutors have no control over federal officers involved in state search for discovery purposes

State prosecutors aren’t necessarily obliged to give over information on federal officers present at a state search considering they have no control over them and their testimony may be hard fought via Touhy letters and they may have nothing additional … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NY Erie Co.: State prosecutors have no control over federal officers involved in state search for discovery purposes

AR: Questions about legality of search before jury properly excluded under 403

Where the trial court denied the pretrial motion to suppress, cross-examination of the officer about the legality of the search was properly denied on objection by the state as potentially misleading to the jury. Damon v. State, 2025 Ark. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on AR: Questions about legality of search before jury properly excluded under 403

E.D.Mo.: Putting def’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search

Putting defendant’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search. The name “Red” was seen on the screen. There was independent probable cause for the cell phone warrant. United States v. Hudson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14952 (E.D. Mo. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Putting def’s cell phone into airplane mode wasn’t a search

OH5: When the trial court sustains a search on two grounds and only one is appealed, the decision will be affirmed

When the trial court sustains a search on two grounds and only one is appealed, the decision will be affirmed. State v. Alexander, 2025-Ohio-236 (4th Dist. Jan. 23, 2025). In an animal seizure case, state law requires a post-seizure administrative … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH5: When the trial court sustains a search on two grounds and only one is appealed, the decision will be affirmed

WA: Long on vehicle protective sweeps not overruled by Gant

Michigan v. Long on protective sweeps of vehicles when a weapon is reasonably feared was not overruled by Gant. State v. Howard, 2025 Wash. App. LEXIS 151 (Jan. 28, 2025). The protective sweep would have been invalid but for valid … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Protective sweep | Comments Off on WA: Long on vehicle protective sweeps not overruled by Gant

TN: Domestic and road rage call is a “serious crime” when evaluating officer’s use of force

When evaluating an officer’s use of force in responding to a domestic and road rage call involving a weapon, it is considered a serious crime. The use of force here was reasonable. Holland v. Cheatham Cty., 2025 Tenn. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Domestic and road rage call is a “serious crime” when evaluating officer’s use of force

ABA: Considering Face Value: The Complex Legal Implications of Facial Recognition Technology

Michael Christopher Naught, Considering Face Value: The Complex Legal Implications of Facial Recognition Technology (ABA Criminal Justice Jan. 20, 2025): The increasing adoption of FRT and AI necessitates careful examination of their legal and ethical ramifications. These cutting-edge technologies raise … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology, Video surveillance | Comments Off on ABA: Considering Face Value: The Complex Legal Implications of Facial Recognition Technology

CA8: Drugs on person admissible under 404(b) despite being outside indictment

Drugs on defendant’s person at the time of arrest were admissible under 404(b) despite being outside the time of the indictment. United States v. Hodo, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1796 (8th Cir. Jan. 28, 2025). Defendant was on supervised release … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA8: Drugs on person admissible under 404(b) despite being outside indictment

Courthouse News: En banc Fourth Circuit panel uses bank robbery to debate geofence warrants

Courthouse News: En banc Fourth Circuit panel uses bank robbery to debate geofence warrants by Joe Dodson (“The full panel of judges discussed the constitutionality of law enforcement using millions of people’s data to solve crimes. [¶] An en banc … Continue reading →

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Courthouse News: En banc Fourth Circuit panel uses bank robbery to debate geofence warrants

GA: SW for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs

A search warrant for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs. State v. Johnson, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 18 (Jan. 28, 2025). Defendant was on supervised release and the search of his cell phone producing child pornography was reasonable. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on GA: SW for blood BAC doesn’t also allow search for drugs

E.D.Mich.: Civil Franks violation was “well established” and QI denied

Plaintiff was arrested for child sexual abuse. The child recanted, and the prosecutor involved was disbarred for misconduct in this case. Plaintiff’s claim for a Franks violation was well established by 1978, and qualified immunity denied. MacMaster v. Busacca, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Civil Franks violation was “well established” and QI denied

D.Mont.: Search incident doctrine didn’t apply where car was searched when def was transported to ER

Officers lacked reasonable suspicion for a probation search of defendant’s vehicle. In addition, its search couldn’t be justified by search incident when he was already transported to the hospital before the search occurred. United States v. Heafner, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Search incident doctrine didn’t apply where car was searched when def was transported to ER

N.D.Ga.: USMJ’s credibility determinations on search issue aren’t subject to de novo review

The USMJ’s credibility determinations on a search issue aren’t subject to de novo review before the USDJ. United States v. Messer, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11783 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 23, 2025).* Collective knowledge supported reasonable suspicion here to extend the … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: USMJ’s credibility determinations on search issue aren’t subject to de novo review

NY Queens: Stop based solely on car description wasn’t with RS

Defendant’s vehicle was stopped solely because of its make and color with no other justification, and thus lacking reasonable suspicion. People v. Mitchell, 2025 NYLJ LEXIS 261 (Queens Co. Jan. 22, 2025).* The use of force here on a food … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Queens: Stop based solely on car description wasn’t with RS