Author Archives: Hall

CA2: Officers using iPhone flashlight and camera to see through car window’s tinting did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy.

Officers used their iPhone flashlight and camera to see through car window’s tinting, and this did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. Tinting the windows doesn’t create an objective expectation of privacy. United States v. Poller, 2025 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA2: Officers using iPhone flashlight and camera to see through car window’s tinting did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy.

MS: Police cell phone search as extensive as prior private search was reasonable

The warrantless search of defendant’s cell phone was the same as a private search that already occurred, and it did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Knight v. State, 2025 Miss. LEXIS 51 (Feb. 20, 2025). An NOLA officer seeing an … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Police cell phone search as extensive as prior private search was reasonable

OR: Cell phone warrant was sufficiently particular to prevent a general rummaging

For this cell phone search, “As explained above, however, the first and fourth search categories are sufficiently specific, and defendant conceded below that the third category is sufficiently specific. Further, the sixth category’s command to search for location information—as circumscribed … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on OR: Cell phone warrant was sufficiently particular to prevent a general rummaging

W.D.Ky.: Police battering ram to door and shots fired inside is a seizure

In the Brianna Taylor civil rights prosecution, the battering ram to the door of the apartment with shots being fired was a seizure of the occupants. United States v. Hankison, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29347 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 19, 2025).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Seizure, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Police battering ram to door and shots fired inside is a seizure

“A Fourth Amendment Press Clause,” in National Security, Journalism, and Law in an Age of Information Warfare, Ethics, National Security, and the Rule of Law (2024)

Hannah Bloch-Wehba, “A Fourth Amendment Press Clause,” in Marc Ambinder, Jennifer R. Henrichsen, and Connie Rosati (eds), National Security, Journalism, and Law in an Age of Information Warfare, Ethics, National Security, and the Rule of Law (New York, 2024; online … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on “A Fourth Amendment Press Clause,” in National Security, Journalism, and Law in an Age of Information Warfare, Ethics, National Security, and the Rule of Law (2024)

CA4: Withheld discovery information about CIs in SW affidavit justified setting aside guilty plea

Defendant’s guilty plea is set aside as a due process as a result of the government withholding information about a second CI in the search warrant papers where the first couldn’t identify him. When the government made a later 775-page … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA4: Withheld discovery information about CIs in SW affidavit justified setting aside guilty plea

CA10: Cross-gender prison strip search of transgender woman stated claim

A cross-gender jail strip search of a transgender woman with gender dysphoria stated a claim. Griffith v. El Paso Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 3734 (10th Cir. Feb. 19, 2025). Defendant was involved in a head-on crash driving on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on CA10: Cross-gender prison strip search of transgender woman stated claim

CA7: Four-day delay in getting released wasn’t a 4A, 8A, or 14A violation

Plaintiff pled to state charges and was to be released by the Illinois DOC. But it was a holiday weekend, and he spent four days in jail. This was neither a Fourth, Eighth, nor Fourteenth Amendment violation. Peoples v. Cook … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Four-day delay in getting released wasn’t a 4A, 8A, or 14A violation

S.D.N.Y.: Sublessee of apartment had standing

Sublessee of an apartment had standing to challenge its search. This can’t be compared to burglars or squatters. United States v. Ephron, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28794 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2025). Defendant wasn’t seized during his encounter with the police … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Sublessee of apartment had standing

CA6: Def’s will found on his person on arrest was validly seized

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging a will defendant wrote saying he’d kill his wife then himself found on his person at the time of arrest. At least inevitable discovery applied because it would have been found in booking … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on CA6: Def’s will found on his person on arrest was validly seized

OH11: Furtive movements in and out of car gave RS to prolong stop

Defendant was stopped for overtinted windows and his furtive movements in and out of the car gave reasonable suspicion to extend the stop. State v. Reuschling, 2025-Ohio-516 (11th Dist. Feb. 18, 2025). The statute excluding evidence unlawfully seized also is … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH11: Furtive movements in and out of car gave RS to prolong stop

VA: Slight diversion from inventory didn’t show it to be pretextual

The towing of defendant’s car left on the interstate without a valid LPN was reasonable. The officers didn’t have to permit him to find his own sources. The inventory was not proved to be pretextual. “But the departures from procedure … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Pretext | Comments Off on VA: Slight diversion from inventory didn’t show it to be pretextual

Reason: Hawaii Can Auction Off Your Car Without Ever Convicting You

Reason: Hawaii Can Auction Off Your Car Without Ever Convicting You by Dan Alban and Elyse Smith Pohl (“Civil forfeiture allows the government of Hawaii to take your property and sell it for profit without proving you did anything wrong.”)

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Hawaii Can Auction Off Your Car Without Ever Convicting You

Harv. L. Rev. Blog Essay: Much Ado About Geofence Warrants

Harv. L. Rev. Blog Essay: Much Ado About Geofence Warrants: United States v. Chatrie, 107 F.4th 319 (4th Cir. 2024) & United States v. Jamarr Smith, 110 F.4th 817 (5th Cir. 2024) by Jackie O’Neil:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Harv. L. Rev. Blog Essay: Much Ado About Geofence Warrants

legalai.com: Evidence Excluded In Murder Case for Failure to Disclose AI Use [from apparent Franks violation]

legalai.com: Evidence Excluded In Murder Case for Failure to Disclose AI Use by Dean Taylor (Feb 17, 2025). The affidavit for warrant obscured that facial recognition powered by AI was used to identify the accused, stating in the motion to … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on legalai.com: Evidence Excluded In Murder Case for Failure to Disclose AI Use [from apparent Franks violation]

D.Me.: 4A doesn’t require that the search warrant be shown before execution

The Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that the search warrant be shown before execution. United States v. Tarr, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26832 (D. Me. Feb. 14, 2025).* During execution of a search warrant for a business, defendant wasn’t in custody … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Me.: 4A doesn’t require that the search warrant be shown before execution

CA9: 4A does not require the recording of telephonic oaths

The Fourth Amendment does not require the recording of telephonic oaths. United States v. Larkins, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 3513 (9th Cir. Feb. 14, 2025). The officer’s conduct was not reckless or deliberate to avoid the good faith exception. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA9: 4A does not require the recording of telephonic oaths

OK: Officer outside territorial jurisdiction isn’t a 4A issue

An officer outside his territorial jurisdiction making an arrest does not implicate the Fourth Amendment. Virginia v. Moore. “As previously stated, Appellant does not challenge that Morgan had probable cause to stop him, or that the search of his vehicle … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OK: Officer outside territorial jurisdiction isn’t a 4A issue

S.D.N.Y.: Govt declines to use challenged evidence so it’s moot; def can reassert if need be

The government says it doesn’t intend to use challenged evidence, so the motion to suppress is moot. If the government changes its mind, defendant can reassert it. United States v. Combs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25641 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2025).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Mootness, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Govt declines to use challenged evidence so it’s moot; def can reassert if need be

CA7: No “rule of thumb” for the Rodriguez moment

There’s no specific amount of time to elapse for a stop to be unreasonable under Rodriguez. All things considered, this was reasonable for six minutes. Other cases in this circuit have upheld them at 14 minutes. United States v. Devalois, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA7: No “rule of thumb” for the Rodriguez moment