CA7: Four-day delay in getting released wasn’t a 4A, 8A, or 14A violation

Plaintiff pled to state charges and was to be released by the Illinois DOC. But it was a holiday weekend, and he spent four days in jail. This was neither a Fourth, Eighth, nor Fourteenth Amendment violation. Peoples v. Cook Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 3668 (7th Cir. Feb. 18, 2025).

That the CI participated in supervised controlled buys with defendant is powerful corroboration, as the Second Circuit has recognized. United States v. Kelly, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28189 (D. Conn. Feb. 18, 2025).*

Under NJ law, it’s not required that the state allege more than an ounce of marijuana was involved since unregulated delivery of any amount is a crime. State v. Gomez, 2025 N.J. Super. LEXIS 14 (Feb. 19, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.