Author Archives: Hall

W.D.Mich.: Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements are an unreasonable search

The Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements amount to an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. Small Bus. Ass’n of Mich. v. Yellen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40975 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 3, 2025):

Posted in Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements are an unreasonable search

W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

Defendant lost a motion to suppress but won a speedy trial dismissal without prejudice. Reindicted, he filed another motion to suppress, but law of the case applies. United States v. Bell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41924 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 7, … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

TN: Nexus shown to cell phone in murder case

The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress the search of his cell phone in a murder case. On the state’s interlocutory appeal, suppression is reversed. There was sufficient nexus shown between the cell phone and the offense under investigation … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on TN: Nexus shown to cell phone in murder case

CA2: 50 days of pole camera surveillance outside a business wasn’t unreasonable search

A pole camera outside defendant’s business for 50 days was not an unreasonable search. United States v. Harry, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5329 (2d Cir. Mar. 7, 2025). Defendant was improperly denied a hearing. The codefendant had a suppression hearing … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Standing | Comments Off on CA2: 50 days of pole camera surveillance outside a business wasn’t unreasonable search

OH6: Background information didn’t make SW affidavit stale

Information in the affidavit for warrant about a 2021 overdose was valid background and not stale information. State v. Martin, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 727 (6th Dist. Mar. 7, 2025). Officers getting a search warrant to enter to arrest was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Staleness | Comments Off on OH6: Background information didn’t make SW affidavit stale

Law.com: Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment

Law.com: Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Law.com: Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment

techspot: EFF launches open-source tool that can detect unauthorized cellular spying

techspot: EFF launches open-source tool that can detect unauthorized cellular spying by Skye Jacobs:

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Cell site simulators | Comments Off on techspot: EFF launches open-source tool that can detect unauthorized cellular spying

VA: Driver can’t consent to search of passenger’s purse

Driver’s consent to search did not extend to a woman’s purse that obviously wasn’t his. Myers v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 138 (Mar. 4, 2025). On the totality of the circumstances, including a suspected drug transaction, the vehicle’s evasive … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on VA: Driver can’t consent to search of passenger’s purse

CA5: The affidavit for SW was more than “bare bones” and the GFE applied

The affidavit for the warrant wasn’t “bare bones.” It alleged facts and nexus could be inferred, even if probable cause couldn’t be fully shown. Therefore, the good faith exception applied. United States v. Norman, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 4908 (5th … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: The affidavit for SW was more than “bare bones” and the GFE applied

CA10: Def’s “self-search” of his bag was consensual

At the Albuquerque Greyhound stop, defendant encountered DEA officers on the bus and ultimately opened his own bag and showed the contents. This “self-search” was consensual, and he was told he had a right to refuse. United States v. Jackson, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s “self-search” of his bag was consensual

GA sustains a geofence warrant linking def to a murder

Georgia sustains a geofence warrant linking defendant to a murder. Jones v. State, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 39 (Mar. 4, 2025):

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on GA sustains a geofence warrant linking def to a murder

E.D.Cal.: 27-page SW affidavit was sufficient and didn’t have to include every detail

The affidavit for warrant was 27 pages long and it omitted a lot of detail, but that’s not enough to show a Franks violation. Every detail doesn’t have to be included, and the omissions here don’t undermine the probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: 27-page SW affidavit was sufficient and didn’t have to include every detail

CA5: False arrest based on suppressed and manipulated information stated claim

Plaintiff sufficiently pled a false arrest claim to survive dismissal. He claimed the officer arrested without probable cause, directed a witness who to pick out of a photo lineup, and ignored and suppressed exculpatory evidence that undermined probable cause. In … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA5: False arrest based on suppressed and manipulated information stated claim

KS: In responding to SW, out-of-state social media company’s authentication statement substantially complied with state law

In responding to a search warrant request, the social media company provided Rule 901 authentication for that state “under penalty of perjury,” but under the law of the United States not the State of Kansas. It was under penalty of … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Pretext, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on KS: In responding to SW, out-of-state social media company’s authentication statement substantially complied with state law

CA6: Facebook picture of stolen lamp gave nexus for SW

An attempt to sell an antique lamp on Facebook provided sufficient nexus to defendant’s house for a search warrant. United States v. Truett, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 4764 (6th Cir. Feb. 27, 2025).* The district court saw the video of … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Nexus, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: Facebook picture of stolen lamp gave nexus for SW

CA6: Franks argument subsumed within PC argument is treated as waived

Defendant’s Franks argument was skeletal and subsumed within his lack of probable cause argument. It is treated as waived. “And we consider arguments forfeited where ‘[i]ssues [are] adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation.’” … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Franks argument subsumed within PC argument is treated as waived

OH1: For probation search, anonymous tip and knowledge of probationer was RS

While anonymous tips alone aren’t reasonable suspicion, in a probation search, an anonymous tip coupled with the PO’s knowledge of the probationer was. State v. Currie, 2025-Ohio-670 (1st Dist. Feb. 28, 2025).* Defendant’s search claim was not shown to be … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH1: For probation search, anonymous tip and knowledge of probationer was RS

CA8: Walkway to front door where mailbox was wasn’t protected curtilage

Defendant’s front yard wasn’t curtilage where there was a walkway to the mailbox by the door. Blood spatter was visible. The officers then went through a fence based on exigency. The observations supported a warrant. United States v. McGhee, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA8: Walkway to front door where mailbox was wasn’t protected curtilage

W.D.Tex.: Body camera shows stop was unreasonably prolonged

“After considering all evidence in context, including Officer Gonzalez’s testimony, her body camera video, and the rest of the record, the Court concludes that she unlawfully prolonged the traffic stop. Even when considering her experience and all facts from an … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Body camera shows stop was unreasonably prolonged

NE: PBT unnecessary for PC if it’s apparent def under influence

The officer didn’t need a PBT to have probable cause for defendant’s DUI arrest. His observation of defendant was enough. State v. Porter, 33 Neb. App. 453 (Feb. 25, 2025).* Inevitable discovery applied. The community caretaking function allowed seizure of … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, FISA, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on NE: PBT unnecessary for PC if it’s apparent def under influence