VA: Driver can’t consent to search of passenger’s purse

Driver’s consent to search did not extend to a woman’s purse that obviously wasn’t his. Myers v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 138 (Mar. 4, 2025).

On the totality of the circumstances, including a suspected drug transaction, the vehicle’s evasive conduct, and defendant’s admission to having a gun, there was reasonable suspicion he was engaged in criminal activity and was armed and dangerous. In light of that, the officers reasonably chose to draw their weapons and use handcuffs to protect themselves. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 4942 (6th Cir. Mar. 3, 2025).*

These search warrants satisfied the particularity requirement because they sufficiently described the generic classes of electronic evidence that could contain recordings of the victim. This was necessary given the hidden nature of the suspected recordings. Defendant failed to show that a motion to suppress would have clearly succeeded, so his ineffective assistance claim fails. Smerk v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 95 (Mar. 4, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.