Author Archives: Hall

AR: Asking for SW before opening the door is not obstructing governmental operations

Asking for a search warrant before opening the door is not obstructing governmental operations. The motion for directed verdict should have been granted. This is not active resistance. Keeton v. State, 2026 Ark. App. 53 (Jan. 28, 2026). The Heck … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AR: Asking for SW before opening the door is not obstructing governmental operations

LAT: LAPD would delete nearly 12 million body camera videos under proposed policy change

LAT: LAPD would delete nearly 12 million body camera videos under proposed policy change by Libor Jany (“The Los Angeles Police Department is seeking a policy change that would allow millions of videos collected from officers’ body-worn and dashboard-mounted cameras … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on LAT: LAPD would delete nearly 12 million body camera videos under proposed policy change

The page on “all SCOTUS cases and links” is restored

Thanks to the Wayback Machine and a little patience. You’ll notice that the Wayback Machine also provides the older links.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The page on “all SCOTUS cases and links” is restored

D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

The impoundment of defendant’s car and his backpack from an apartment complex parking lot was not shown to be within the standardized procedures of the department. That’s the government’s burden. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Majedi, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

E.D.Tenn.: No showing of nexus to cell phones in pharmacy fraud

In a pharmacy fraud case, there was no showing of nexus to pharmacists’ cell phones. Motion to suppress cell phones is granted. Also, under Franks, with an omission a higher standard of intent to mislead applies. Also, the affidavit is … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: No showing of nexus to cell phones in pharmacy fraud

CNS: Maryland man argues arrest using cellphone tracking device violates the Fourth Amendment

CNS: Maryland man argues arrest using cellphone tracking device violates the Fourth Amendment by Sydney Haulenbeek (“His attorney argued the police ‘basically seized’ his phone with the equipment police used to locate him. [¶] “A Maryland man arrested after police … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Cell site simulators | Comments Off on CNS: Maryland man argues arrest using cellphone tracking device violates the Fourth Amendment

WaPo: Families of men killed in boat strikes sue Trump administration

WaPo: Families of men killed in boat strikes sue Trump administration by Mariana Alfaro & Dan Lamothe (“The families of two Trinidadian men killed in October during a U.S. strike on boats off the coast of Venezuela filed a wrongful-death … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, National security | Comments Off on WaPo: Families of men killed in boat strikes sue Trump administration

VA: Exclusionary rule does not apply in animal cruelty forfeitures

The exclusionary rule does not apply in animal cruelty forfeitures, distinguishing One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania. Mogensen v. Cty. of Rockbridge, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 46 (Jan. 27, 2026). Defendant’s stop for a broken taillight lacked reasonable suspicion because … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: Exclusionary rule does not apply in animal cruelty forfeitures

D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

There was probable cause for the stop and search of defendant’s car before the pretextual stop. Therefore, it was all valid. United States v. Nieves, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 272309 (D. Minn. Dec. 1, 2025).* Defendant’s stop was with reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

IL: Failure to conduct a preliminary hearing for PC mooted by conviction

Failure to conduct a preliminary hearing to establish probable cause is mooted by defendant’s conviction after trial. People v. Chambliss, 2026 IL 130585, 2025 Ill. LEXIS 7 (Jan. 23, 2026). “Lucas claims that Rubenstahl violated her Fourth Amendment right to … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on IL: Failure to conduct a preliminary hearing for PC mooted by conviction

N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure. Keith v. Romain, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13105 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2026). Police responded to a bar on a ShotSpotter report, but it was for naught. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

WaPo: How officers used new ICE memo to forcefully enter a Minneapolis home

WaPo: How officers used new ICE memo to forcefully enter a Minneapolis home by Arelis R. Hernández (“With long guns pointed in her direction, Teyana Gibson repeatedly demanded that federal immigration officers show her a warrant as she stood between … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: How officers used new ICE memo to forcefully enter a Minneapolis home

Reason: ICE Tells Legal Observer, ‘We Have a Nice Little Database, and Now You’re Considered a Domestic Terrorist’

Reason: ICE Tells Legal Observer, ‘We Have a Nice Little Database, and Now You’re Considered a Domestic Terrorist’ by C.J. Ciaramella (“Video taken this [Friday] in Maine shows an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer taking pictures of a legal … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Reason: ICE Tells Legal Observer, ‘We Have a Nice Little Database, and Now You’re Considered a Domestic Terrorist’

KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE

This geofence warrant was valid by the good faith exception. State v. Mitchell-Pennington, 2026 Kan. App. LEXIS 6 (Jan. 23, 2026). The omitted facts merely clarified, not defeated, probable cause. The motion to suppress was properly denied. Urrutia v. State, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Consent, Franks doctrine, geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS: Geofence warrant valid under GFE

E.D.Pa.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to grand jury evidence

Under Calandra (1974), there’s no basis for dismissing an indictment because it might be based on an illegal search. The search was valid anyway because it was based on the consenter’s apparent authority. United States v. Jones, 2026 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Immigration arrests, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to grand jury evidence

SC: DNA taken on 2007 arrest didn’t need to be suppressed because he was acquitted back then

Defendant’s DNA was taken when he was charged in 2007 and later acquitted. The DNA sample should not be suppressed because it was lawfully taken at the time. State v. Harrington, 2026 S.C. App. LEXIS 7 (Jan. 21, 2026). Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SC: DNA taken on 2007 arrest didn’t need to be suppressed because he was acquitted back then

WaPo: As ICE arrests surged, Trump administration sought to cut bodycam program

WaPo: As ICE arrests surged, Trump administration sought to cut bodycam program by Maria Sacchetti (“A string of violent incidents has added fresh urgency to calls for more body-worn cameras. But DHS proposed reducing spending on them in its initial … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WaPo: As ICE arrests surged, Trump administration sought to cut bodycam program

DC: Detention at park for talking to another person was without RS

Defendant was at a park with his child and he saw someone he knew who he went to and talked to. Police started coming for the other person, so he left him and went back to his child. Then two … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Detention at park for talking to another person was without RS

S.D.N.Y.: Email SW with “practical accuracy” particular enough

Email warrant was particular enough with “practical accuracy”: “But the Second Circuit has upheld the validity of warrants without the presence of exacting, rigid limitations, noting that the focus is ‘on practical accuracy, as opposed to technical precision.’ United States … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Email SW with “practical accuracy” particular enough

CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies

Defendant’s pants were transported from the hospital to the jail, and inevitable discovery covers their search. United States v. Gibbins, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432 (4th Cir. Jan. 21, 2026). The warrant for five cell phones was executed within the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inevitable discovery, Prison and jail searches, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Def’s pants transported from hospital to jail were searched, and inevitable discovery applies