Author Archives: Hall

MD: State’s failure to litigate standing at suppression hearing is waiver

The state’s failure to litigate standing at the suppression hearing is its waiver. On the merits, the information failed to show probable cause via collective knowledge. Seizure of bloody clothing in a bag in the hallway outside the ER was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on MD: State’s failure to litigate standing at suppression hearing is waiver

CA6: Even if SW was issued without PC, it was still in good faith

Even if the warrant here was lacking probable cause, it was obtained and executed in good faith, so the suppression order is reversed. United States v. Tanzil, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30653 (6th Cir. Nov. 20, 2025)*:

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA6: Even if SW was issued without PC, it was still in good faith

NV citizen’s arrest requires crime occur in arrestor’s presence

Defendant entered making a citizen’s arrest for a crime that did not occur in his presence. His conviction is affirmed because that’s a statutory requirement. The knock-and-announce requirement in the statute also serves an important purpose in citizen’s arrest. Ser … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Knock and announce | Comments Off on NV citizen’s arrest requires crime occur in arrestor’s presence

M.D.Fla.: No REP against ALPR tracking LPN information

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy against ALPR tracking of a car. It’s not at all like Carpenter’s CSLI. United States v. Floyd, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229044 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 21, 2025):

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: No REP against ALPR tracking LPN information

Five on habeas

The district court granted a limited CoA in this 2254 appeal. Petitioner doesn’t get to expand it to a consensual recording issue [that is frivolous]. Sontay v. Heidle, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30613 (6th Cir. Nov. 21, 2025).* 2241 petitioner’s … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on Five on habeas

CA6: Zoning officer’s attempting to post a stop work order was not a seizure of real property

Defendant had no constitutional right to build a greenhouse in his front yard in violation of a city zoning ordinance, and the zoning official did not seize his property by attempting to post a stop work order on it. “While … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA6: Zoning officer’s attempting to post a stop work order was not a seizure of real property

N.D.Ill.: ICE may be seeking to cause confrontations as an excuse to use force

Chicago Headline Club v. Noem, No. 25 C 12173 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 20, 2025) (233 pages). Just as to driving:

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: ICE may be seeking to cause confrontations as an excuse to use force

D.Mass.: “All records” relating to wire fraud was particular enough

“The warrant here, and, specifically, the attachment describing the items to be seized, satisfied the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement. Kerrissey argues, first, that the attachment was overbroad because it authorized the seizure of ‘“all records, in whatever form” for multiple … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Mass.: “All records” relating to wire fraud was particular enough

OH5: Pleading guilty without seeing SW materials stated enough to get post-conviction hearing

The state’s plea offer was to plead without getting any discovery. Defendant adequately pled defense counsel was ineffective for counseling this, including waiving getting access to the search warrant materials. The trial court erred in denying a hearing. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH5: Pleading guilty without seeing SW materials stated enough to get post-conviction hearing

VA: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in revos

The exclusionary rule, along with a host of other things, doesn’t apply in revocation proceedings. Commonwealth v. Jackson, 2025 Va. LEXIS 57 (Nov. 20, 2025) (citing treatise § 9.16). The collective knowledge doctrine applies to traffic stops. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on VA: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in revos

Reason: Lindsey Graham Is Outraged About Federal Surveillance Powers That Lindsey Graham Helped Create and Expand

Reason: Lindsey Graham Is Outraged About Federal Surveillance Powers That Lindsey Graham Helped Create and Expand by Eric Boehm (“Graham is incensed that his phone records were subpoenaed by federal prosecutors—without his knowledge—as part of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, National security | Comments Off on Reason: Lindsey Graham Is Outraged About Federal Surveillance Powers That Lindsey Graham Helped Create and Expand

LAT: ICE is grabbing U.S. citizens, defying its own rules and the Constitution

And Justice Kavanagh said this wouldn’t happen: LAT: ICE is grabbing U.S. citizens, defying its own rules and the Constitution by Raul A. Reyes:

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on LAT: ICE is grabbing U.S. citizens, defying its own rules and the Constitution

NBC: Top military lawyer raised legal concerns about boat strikes

NBC: Top military lawyer raised legal concerns about boat strikes by Gordon Lubold, Courtney Kube and Dan De Luce (“The lawyer at U.S. Southern Command, which oversees the operations against alleged drug-smuggling boats near Venezuela, disagreed that the strikes are … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Foreign searches | Comments Off on NBC: Top military lawyer raised legal concerns about boat strikes

CA1: Lobstering is a closely-regulated industry

Lobstering is a closely regulated industry, and GPS tracking of lobster boats by the State of Maine is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Thompson v. Wilson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30135 (1st Cir. Nov. 18, 2025) (appellant first conceded that … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA1: Lobstering is a closely-regulated industry

S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

A murder for hire scheme was exigency for a warrantless search. Here, the officers thought the firearm would be moved imminently on December 31, 2024, but the warrant wasn’t signed until after midnight January 1, 2025. It wasn’t automatically stale, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

AR: Warrantless entry under 12-year-old drug abatement search order never before challenged was in good faith, despite 4A violation

There was a drug abatement order from 2011 for an apartment area in Jonesboro, Arkansas. A sign warned of warrantless residential searches. The JPD street crimes unit saw several men standing outside defendant’s apartment. Marijuana could be smelled, and they … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on AR: Warrantless entry under 12-year-old drug abatement search order never before challenged was in good faith, despite 4A violation

LA: Communal parking area at a “trailer park” was not curtilage

Defendant’s car in a “trailer park” communal parking area near his place was not on his “curtilage.” The court of appeals erred in finding it was curtilage. State v. Charles, 2025 La. LEXIS 1624 (Nov. 19, 2025). “Here, the renewed … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LA: Communal parking area at a “trailer park” was not curtilage

CA5: Overnight guest’s stuff subject to search under warrant for premises

Defendant was an overnight guest at the place searched, and the officers executing a warrant were authorized to search her stuff, too. United States v. Inyang, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30148 (5th Cir. Nov. 18, 2025). Undercover officer’s recording in … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA5: Overnight guest’s stuff subject to search under warrant for premises

E.D.Mich.: Seeing handgun reasonably led to handcuffing to see if def had permit on him

Officers suspected defendant was carrying a weapon, and they saw it as they approached. Under state law, he had to have the permit on him. “So, were the officers’ following actions (handcuffing Pettes and putting him in the squad car) … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Seeing handgun reasonably led to handcuffing to see if def had permit on him

M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

In this false arrest case, the sheriff admitted he had no training in the Fourth Amendment. Harris v. Breeden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225584 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2025). The frisk here was without reasonable suspicion, including the bag defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training