Author Archives: Hall

OH7: Defense counsel’s strategic choice to not challenge search was reasonable; he exploited it in cross of the officers

Defense counsel’s strategic choice to not challenge a search and embrace the result of the search for cross-examination was reasonable. And it was justified because it resulted in acquittal on a big count. State v. Baker, 2020-Ohio-7023, 2020 Ohio App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH7: Defense counsel’s strategic choice to not challenge search was reasonable; he exploited it in cross of the officers

NJLJ: Commentary: Use of Facial Recognition Following Capitol Siege Highlights Issues Seen in NJ Case

NJLJ: Commentary: Use of Facial Recognition Following Capitol Siege Highlights Issues Seen in NJ Case by David Gialanella (“This case, it now appears, will be one of many. The mob invasion of the U.S. Capitol has prompted calls for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NJLJ: Commentary: Use of Facial Recognition Following Capitol Siege Highlights Issues Seen in NJ Case

E.D.Wash.: Where buy money was recorded, SW for it has to itemize it

Where buy money has recorded serial numbers, that’s required in a search warrant for the money to satisfy particularity. Also, the good faith exception did not apply. United States v. Contreras-Aguilar, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8613 (E.D. Wash. Jan. 15, … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Where buy money was recorded, SW for it has to itemize it

CA10: Weaknesses in the PC for Franks should be disclosed

Plaintiff failed to show a Franks violation in the affidavit for warrant. “To be sure, if the affiant for a warrant possesses information that would cast substantial doubt on the existence of probable cause, that information should not be intentionally … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA10: Weaknesses in the PC for Franks should be disclosed

D.Mass.: 15 month delay in getting SW for cell phone seized with PC was unreasonable, but GFE applies

The 15-month delay between seizure of a cell phone with probable cause is was unreasonable, applying United States v. Smith, 967 F.3d 198, 202 (2d Cir. 2020). However, the court finds that the good faith exception applies, and the court … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: 15 month delay in getting SW for cell phone seized with PC was unreasonable, but GFE applies

CA10: 4A imposes no duty for officer to seek out a video to confirm PC officer already has

Before an officer files a criminal complaint, there is no constitutional duty to review potential video of the occurrence. The video here wasn’t quickly accessible to the officer. Here, there was probable cause and this other constitutional claim is not … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: 4A imposes no duty for officer to seek out a video to confirm PC officer already has

S.D.W.Va.: Stop of out-of-state vehicle for expired tags objectively reasonable despite Executive Order in other state extending time because of Covid

Defendant’s stop for expired tags in another state was objectively reasonable because the officer couldn’t have known that there was a Covid executive order extending the time to renew vehicle licenses in the other state. Maybe in the officer’s own … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Stop of out-of-state vehicle for expired tags objectively reasonable despite Executive Order in other state extending time because of Covid

CA10: Code enforcement officer coming to ptf’s door to talk to him didn’t violate curtilage

A city code enforcement officer who came to plaintiff’s door for a couple of minutes to attempt to talk to him about a sign code violation did not violate the curtilage. Clark v. City of Williamsburg, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA10: Code enforcement officer coming to ptf’s door to talk to him didn’t violate curtilage

The Appeal: They Took Umbrellas To A Black Lives Matter Protest. The D.A. Hit Them With Gang Charges

The Appeal: They Took Umbrellas To A Black Lives Matter Protest. The D.A. Hit Them With Gang Charges, by Med O’Connor (“Police and prosecutors routinely treat white domestic terrorists with kid gloves, but use the full force of the law … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Pretext | Comments Off on The Appeal: They Took Umbrellas To A Black Lives Matter Protest. The D.A. Hit Them With Gang Charges

CA6: Judge issuing SW isn’t barred from conducting trial

The Michigan state courts’ conclusion that the judge who issued a search warrant was not barred from hearing the trial was based on precedent, the judge didn’t remember the search warrant, and it is not an unreasonable application of existing … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on CA6: Judge issuing SW isn’t barred from conducting trial

D.Colo.: Hotel has no duty to protect guest from 4A violations, assuming there was one

An airline pilot nude in his room who was seen through the window doesn’t state a Fourth Amendment claim that the hotel had a duty to protect him from being seen by the public. Besides that, he doesn’t state any … Continue reading →

Posted in Search | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Hotel has no duty to protect guest from 4A violations, assuming there was one

EFF: So-called “Consent Searches” Harm Our Digital Rights

EFF: So-called “Consent Searches” Harm Our Digital Rights by Adam Schwartz:

Posted in Consent, Digital privacy, Digital Searches | Comments Off on EFF: So-called “Consent Searches” Harm Our Digital Rights

TX11: No spousal privilege in recorded jail calls

Defendant’s jail calls to his wife were not privileged because he knew from the recording at the start of the call that it was being recorded. Newman v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 293 (Tex. App. – Eastland Jan. 14, … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Privileges, Strip search | Comments Off on TX11: No spousal privilege in recorded jail calls

NPR: War On Terror Birthed Pentagon’s Automated Biometrics Identification System

NPR: War On Terror Birthed Pentagon’s Automated Biometrics Identification System by Steve Inskeep (“NPR’s Steve Inskeep talks to investigative reporter Annie Jacobsen, author of the new book, First Platoon, about how the U.S. has employed the use of biometric data … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NPR: War On Terror Birthed Pentagon’s Automated Biometrics Identification System

D.V.I.: Failure to put on proof at suppression hearing leads to show cause order to defense

Defendant filed a motion to suppress a statement and a search. At the hearing, however, the search wasn’t challenged. Defendant has to show cause why that part of the motion should not be denied. United States v. Henry, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on D.V.I.: Failure to put on proof at suppression hearing leads to show cause order to defense

N.D.Ohio: Regular borrowing of a vehicle gave def standing when he had it; affidavit “bare bones” so no GFE

Defendant’s regular borrowing of a vehicle gave him standing in the vehicle when he was driving it. “In sum, the affidavit in support of the December 8, 2017 search warrant fails to provide the requisite ‘“nexus between the place to … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Regular borrowing of a vehicle gave def standing when he had it; affidavit “bare bones” so no GFE

CA1: When police justifiably shoot at a car, a passenger hit has no claim

A police officer fired at a vehicle driven by an armed man that was trying to hit him, and a passenger was hit. On the undisputed facts, the use of force was reasonable. Fagre v. Parks, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA1: When police justifiably shoot at a car, a passenger hit has no claim

D.Nev.: Running wants or warrants on a sex offender involved in a stop didn’t violate 4A

Running wants or warrants on a sex offender involved in a stop didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. McCowan, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6500 (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2021).* The affidavit for the search warrant shows probable cause. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Running wants or warrants on a sex offender involved in a stop didn’t violate 4A

OR: With recreational MJ, the odor of MJ in a rental car is not RS for trafficking

In a recreational marijuana state, “We are unprepared to say that, as to any person driving a rental car on a public highway in Oregon that is also used by drug traffickers, any odor of marijuana gives rise to reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: With recreational MJ, the odor of MJ in a rental car is not RS for trafficking

CA4: Ptf’s claim the statute he was arrested under was unconstitutional is barred by DeFillippo

Plaintiff’s claim that his arrest and search was invalid because the statute under which he was stopped and arrested was unconstitutional is barred by Michigan v. DeFillippo. Quigley v. City of Huntington, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 760 (4th Cir. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf’s claim the statute he was arrested under was unconstitutional is barred by DeFillippo