Author Archives: Hall

KY: Def needs to make a record on how long the drug dog extended the stop under Rodriguez

The drug dog arrived while the traffic tickets were still being written. All the record shows is that. The record doesn’t “reveal how much time elapsed between the canine’s arrival and it alerting to the odor of unlawful drugs emanating … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Privileges | Comments Off on KY: Def needs to make a record on how long the drug dog extended the stop under Rodriguez

WSJ: A Police Drone Might Be Behind Your Next Ticket

WSJ: A Police Drone Might Be Behind Your Next Ticket by James Fanelli (“Law enforcement is expanding the use of remotely controlled drones despite concerns of civil liberties groups”):

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on WSJ: A Police Drone Might Be Behind Your Next Ticket

W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

No clear line of cases suggests the officer’s searching inside plaintiff’s underwear was unreasonable where it was not seen by anyone else. “Plaintiff’s right to be free from such a search was not clearly established at that time and Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

D.S.C.: Issuing magistrate sharing address with LE agency doesn’t make the magistrate not “neutral and detached”

The issuing magistrate is not shown to be an adjunct law enforcement officer just because the judge shares an address with a police department. Martinez v. Wilson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 268655 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2025). The search incident of … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Issuing magistrate sharing address with LE agency doesn’t make the magistrate not “neutral and detached”

M.D.Pa.: CSAM PC allegations never go stale

Child pornography probable cause allegations, especially those on a computer have a “long shelf life” and virtually never go stale. United States v. Picca, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 267611 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 30, 2025). Plaintiff alleged enough to proceed past … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: CSAM PC allegations never go stale

CA10: Protective sweep of car was valid despite presence of six officers; def would get back in car

There was reasonable suspicion enough potential for dangerousness for a protective sweep of defendant’s car. “The district court’s dangerousness analysis relied on four factors: (1) Raban’s gang affiliation, (2) the high-crime and rival-gang neighborhood, (3) Armstrong’s presence, and (4) Raban’s … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA10: Protective sweep of car was valid despite presence of six officers; def would get back in car

Kavanaugh Stops #4

Reason: Did Brett Kavanaugh Just Apologize for Butchering the Fourth Amendment? Maybe. by Damon Root (“Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice”):

Posted in immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Kavanaugh Stops #4

Reason: DHS Says REAL ID, Which DHS Certifies, Is Too Unreliable To Confirm U.S. Citizenship

Reason: DHS Says REAL ID, Which DHS Certifies, Is Too Unreliable To Confirm U.S. Citizenship by C.J. Ciaramella*:

Posted in immigration stops | Comments Off on Reason: DHS Says REAL ID, Which DHS Certifies, Is Too Unreliable To Confirm U.S. Citizenship

DE: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is waiver with no plain error review

Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is waiver, and it will not be considered on plain error review, and for good reason. Swanson v. State, 2025 Del. LEXIS 504 (Dec. 31, 2025):

Posted in Motion to suppress, Waiver | Comments Off on DE: Failure to file a pretrial motion to suppress is waiver with no plain error review

CA9: Evidence seized by state not taken or used by feds not subject to Rule 41(g)

State officers seized defendant’s Rolex watch in a search, and there was a federal prosecution, but the watch was never part of it nor evidence of anything. Thus, Rule 41(g) affords him no relief here. There’s no constructive federal possession … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA9: Evidence seized by state not taken or used by feds not subject to Rule 41(g)

The Sixth Edition is 15% off today

Search and Seizure a $100 savings

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Sixth Edition is 15% off today

FL: Request for consent after stop outside city jurisdiction was reasonable

A municipal police officer had authority to request consent after a stop outside his territorial jurisdiction. One justice concurring said that’s not a Fourth Amendment violation anyway, and suppression wouldn’t be an appropriate remedy. State v. Repple, 2025 Fla. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on FL: Request for consent after stop outside city jurisdiction was reasonable

Slate: Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late.

Slate: Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late. By Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern:

Posted in immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Slate: Brett Kavanaugh Is Trying to Walk Back “Kavanaugh Stops.” Too Late.

D.Md.: Photos taken during search come in at trial

Photos taken during execution of a search warrant are coming in at trial. “Photos of the location where the items were recovered supports the allegation by placing the search warrant in context.” United States v. Jenifer, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Md.: Photos taken during search come in at trial

TX3: Motion to suppress never ruled on is waived for appeal

Defendant filed a motion to suppress but didn’t get a hearing or ruling on it. Then, at trial, made a motion in limine but that didn’t preserve the lack of probable cause issue from the motion to suppress. It’s all … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Waiver | Comments Off on TX3: Motion to suppress never ruled on is waived for appeal

CA9: 5A takings clause doesn’t support damages claim during SWAT siege; concurrence seemingly finds 4A privilege

Pena v. City of L.A., 158 F.4th 1033 (9th Cir. 2025). From the Syllabus:

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on CA9: 5A takings clause doesn’t support damages claim during SWAT siege; concurrence seemingly finds 4A privilege

CA11: ALPR showing short round trip to Atlanta supported stop with RS

On plain error review, it can’t be said there was no reasonable suspicion whatsoever essentially based on a license plate reader that the car’s round trip to Atlanta was suspiciously short. Thus, “we cannot say that the district court committed … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA11: ALPR showing short round trip to Atlanta supported stop with RS

UT: Inventory policy needs somehow to be in evidence to challenge scope of search

If you’re challenging whether the officer exceeded an inventory policy, it needs to be in evidence. Here there was only testimony about the written policy, and the court could rely on that. Here, the claim was that inventorying a backpack … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Scope of search | Comments Off on UT: Inventory policy needs somehow to be in evidence to challenge scope of search

E.D.La.: Parties present their issues timely, not in motions to reconsider

From 10/5 post: Defendant here satisfied his Franks burden of showing a lack of probable cause after the false information was excised. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Wells, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195302 (E.D. La. Oct. 2, 2025).* … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Parties present their issues timely, not in motions to reconsider

NMI: “An arrest warrant is exhausted once used.”

“An arrest warrant is exhausted once used. Carlson v. Landon, 342 U.S. 524, 546 (1952); ….” After that, another must issue. The trial court didn’t err in requiring one. Commonwealth v. Superior Court, 2025 MP 14 (N.M.I. Dec. 23, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on NMI: “An arrest warrant is exhausted once used.”