Author Archives: Hall

OH7: Questioning def about drugs on his person extended stop

The traffic stop was delayed, and the public safety exception was not applicable, where the officer asked a compound question, and the questioning only appeared directed at getting an admission by appellant that he had drugs on him and suggesting … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH7: Questioning def about drugs on his person extended stop

M.D.Pa.: Air freshener in a non-smoking rental car factor in RS

“[T]he air freshener in a non-smoking rental car was an early and legitimate basis for suspicion to be aroused. In general, the use of air fresheners is a recognized factor contributing to reasonable suspicion.” United States v. Hawari-Rasulullah, 2022 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Air freshener in a non-smoking rental car factor in RS

W.D.N.C.: Not 4A violation to order def to keep hands visible

It is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment to tell the defendant to keep his hands visible and not reach in the car during a stop. If a person can be ordered out of the car for officer safety, … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Not 4A violation to order def to keep hands visible

MS: SW for Arkansas car’s GPS was used to put it at scene of crime

Defendant’s car was registered in Arkansas and was believed to be in a shootout in Mississippi. The car was found in Arkansas. Defendant was arrested on a Mississippi warrant and a search warrant was issued for the car’s GPS to … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause, Roadblocks | Comments Off on MS: SW for Arkansas car’s GPS was used to put it at scene of crime

CA10: Pre-PC hearing jail excessive force claim is a 4A claim, not 14A

A jail excessive force case that happened before plaintiff’s probable cause hearing is a Fourth Amendment claim, not under the Fourteenth Amendment. Geddes v. Weber Cty., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 22719 (10th Cir. Aug. 16, 2022):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA10: Pre-PC hearing jail excessive force claim is a 4A claim, not 14A

W.D.Mich.: PC shown vehicle was involved in string of robberies for GPS tracking

Probable cause supported the warrant to install a GPS tracking device on defendant’s vehicle. The government showed probable cause to believe it and he were involved in a series of cash store robberies. United States v. Rolling, 2022 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, GPS / Tracking Data, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: PC shown vehicle was involved in string of robberies for GPS tracking

LATimes: Police Commission sets new rules for how LAPD uses surveillance technology

LATimes: Police Commission sets new rules for how LAPD uses surveillance technology (“The Los Angeles Police Commission on Tuesday adopted new rules for how police can use crimefighting technologies, despite opposition from advocacy groups who said they could lead to … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on LATimes: Police Commission sets new rules for how LAPD uses surveillance technology

Wired: Police Used a Baby’s DNA to Investigate Its Father for a Crime

Wired: Police Used a Baby’s DNA to Investigate Its Father for a Crime (“The blood is supposed to be used for medical purposes—these screenings identify babies with serious health issues, and they have been highly successful at reducing death and … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Wired: Police Used a Baby’s DNA to Investigate Its Father for a Crime

W.D.Tex.: Protective sweep justified despite hearing no one inside

A protective sweep of defendant’s apartment was reasonable on the totality despite the officers not hearing anyone inside. United States v. Turner, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144215 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 12, 2022). “At no point did Veney voluntarily submit to … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Seizure, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Protective sweep justified despite hearing no one inside

D.N.J.: Holding a vehicle 4 days before searching it was not unreasonable

“While law enforcement held the Durango for four days after the seizure before searching it pursuant to a warrant, this delay did not render the continuing seizure of the Durango unreasonable. See Donahue, 764 F.3d at 300-01 (collecting cases and … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Independent source | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Holding a vehicle 4 days before searching it was not unreasonable

CA5: USPS letter carrier not a 4A govt actor

A regular USPS letter carrier is not a governmental actor the Fourth Amendment governs. Here, her thumb slipped through a preexisting hole in a package she was delivering, and she became suspicious it contained drugs and wouldn’t leave it at … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages | Comments Off on CA5: USPS letter carrier not a 4A govt actor

W.D.Mo.: 26 day delay in getting cell phone SW wasn’t unreasonable

A 26 day delay between seizure of a cell phone and issuance of a search warrant for it was not constitutionally unreasonable. Defendant’s motion for return of the phone is deferred until the trial is over. United States v. Brown, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Consent, Protective sweep | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: 26 day delay in getting cell phone SW wasn’t unreasonable

N.D.Cal.: Prolonging traffic stop to inquire of probation or parole status unreasonable

Prolonging the traffic stop for further information on defendant’s parole and probation status was unreasonable. It diverted from the traffic stop. United States v. Gould, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142915 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2022). The protective sweep of defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Prolonging traffic stop to inquire of probation or parole status unreasonable

W.D.N.Y.: 4A doesn’t protect a jail cell shakedown search; procedural due process does not apply

Defendant’s jail cell was subjected to a shakedown search, and it was reasonable. His claim of procedural due process safeguards come from civil cases and don’t apply. United States v. Arrington, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142770 (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2022). … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: 4A doesn’t protect a jail cell shakedown search; procedural due process does not apply

NY2: Search of wallet during a frisk unreasonable

Officers violated the Fourth Amendment during defendant’s frisk when they removed his wallet from his pocket and searched it. People v. Lewis, 2022 NY Slip Op 04920, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4797 (2d Dept. Aug. 10, 2022). The officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Overseizure, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NY2: Search of wallet during a frisk unreasonable

CA4: Avoid “divide-and-conquer” reasoning on RS and PC

The record doesn’t definitively support the district court’s conclusion that the government proved forfeitability of the cash. The record was enough in dispute that there needed to be a trial on the merits. United States v. McClellan, 2022 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: Avoid “divide-and-conquer” reasoning on RS and PC

OR: No REP in medical records that include BAC results

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records including the results of defendant’s BAC test. State v. Hoffman, 321 Or. App. 330 (Aug. 10, 2022):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: No REP in medical records that include BAC results

PA: Failure to argue new case law where it came out 3-1/2 months before suppression hearing was waiver

Defendant doesn’t get the application of a case to his decided 3½ months before his suppression hearing where he didn’t argue it. Commonwealth v. Brown, 2022 PA Super 138 (Aug. 10, 2022). CSLI lawfully obtained before Carpenter saved by the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on PA: Failure to argue new case law where it came out 3-1/2 months before suppression hearing was waiver

M.D.Pa.: No QI for violation of knock-and-announce; fact question for trial

Defendant officers’ motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity for violating the knock-and-announce rule is denied. The law is well settled for 25 years and there are no blanket exceptions. The rest is fact bound. Murphy v. Grochowski, 2022 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: No QI for violation of knock-and-announce; fact question for trial

CA4: It was “immediately apparent” glass pipe was drug paraphernalia

A glass pipe almost certainly for ingesting drugs was “immediately apparent” for plain view, citing United States v. Van Zee, 380 F.3d 342 (8th Cir. 2004). United States v. Runner, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 21854 (4th Cir. Aug. 8, 2022). … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: It was “immediately apparent” glass pipe was drug paraphernalia