Author Archives: Hall

OH5: Drone flyover found car hidden in def’s open fields

Defendant owned a vehicle police suspected was involved in an accident, and suspected it was hidden on his somewhat rural property. They used a drone to fly over the property seeing what was likely the car and then got a … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Open fields, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH5: Drone flyover found car hidden in def’s open fields

CA2: No REP shown in porch shared with neighbor

Defendant shared a porch with his neighbor and made no effort to show a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. United States v. Lewis, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 6689 (2d Cir. Mar. 21, 2023).* The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA2: No REP shown in porch shared with neighbor

NYT: In Memphis, Car Seizures Are a Lucrative and Punishing Police Tactic

NYT: In Memphis, Car Seizures Are a Lucrative and Punishing Police Tactic by Jessica Jaglois and Mike Baker (“It has been used to combat street racing and other crimes, but critics said that vehicles have been kept for months from … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on NYT: In Memphis, Car Seizures Are a Lucrative and Punishing Police Tactic

OH3: Look behind refrigerator during exigent entry was inadvertent plain view

The warrantless entry into defendant’s house was justified by the exigency of a child allegedly in peril, which was not in dispute. While waiting for paperwork to be completed, one officer could see slightly behind the refrigerator and saw packaged … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH3: Look behind refrigerator during exigent entry was inadvertent plain view

D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

Three days of real time CSLI was obtained by the police because of a missing child, and it was reasonable as exigency. United States v. Torres, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44017 (D.N.M. Mar. 15, 2023).* No qualified immunity for Tasing … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

D.Kan.: Not responding to govt’s 4A alternative arguments de facto waiver

The government’s alterative theories to support the search were sufficient to avoid even deciding a good faith mistake of fact by the officers. Moreover, defendant never addressed the government’s alternative arguments in his briefing. United States v. Bell-Johnson, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Not responding to govt’s 4A alternative arguments de facto waiver

E.D.Wis.: PC for a place can be shown by inference

Probable cause evidence can be found in a particular place can be shown by inference, and direct evidence not required. United States v. Hayes, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45203 (E.D. Wis. Jan. 17, 2023),* adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44211 … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: PC for a place can be shown by inference

E.D.La.: 4A and Art. III standing are distinct questions

Just because there’s no Fourth Amendment “standing” in bank records, that doesn’t mean that there’s no Article III standing to challenge interference with privacy in bank records. Hawkins v. Sanders, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45000 (E.D. La. Mar. 16, 2023):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.La.: 4A and Art. III standing are distinct questions

HI: Miranda warnings required whenever PC develops for arrest

“Miranda warnings are required by article I, section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Hawai’i when probable cause to arrest has developed. And in Hewitt’s case, contrary to the ICA’s conclusion, probable cause had developed before she was … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Custody, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: Miranda warnings required whenever PC develops for arrest

WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

Defendant’s freedom under the state constitution to not be interfered with in his private affairs was violated by a stop and inquiry whether he had paid a transit fare. He provided a false name that led to his prosecution for … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Stop to inquire of paying transit fare violated state constitution

OH1: Defense counsel ineffective for not challenging state’s alleged consent after they announced “we’re going to be doing a search warrant here”

“The totality of the circumstances show that the signed consent-to-search form was not a product of consent, but an acquiescence to a claim of lawful authority.” “As Gaston complied with Davis’s instructions to sit in a chair on the porch, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Consent | Comments Off on OH1: Defense counsel ineffective for not challenging state’s alleged consent after they announced “we’re going to be doing a search warrant here”

CA10: Five seconds is de minimus under Rodriguez

In a short per curiam, the Tenth Circuit upholds a dog sniff under Rodriguez without explanation. The concurrence, however, tells us that the stop was extended five seconds past the “Rodriguez moment” as still reasonable. United States v. Hayes, 2023 … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Five seconds is de minimus under Rodriguez

Reason: An Oregon Man Was Wrongly Imprisoned for Almost a Year Because of an Error in a DMV Database

Reason: An Oregon Man Was Wrongly Imprisoned for Almost a Year Because of an Error in a DMV Database by Emma Camp (“Nicholas Chappelle spent almost a year in an Oregon prison after he was wrongfully convicted of driving with … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on Reason: An Oregon Man Was Wrongly Imprisoned for Almost a Year Because of an Error in a DMV Database

E.D.Tex.: Criminal trespass warning is not a 4A seizure

A criminal trespass warning is not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Shaikh v. Allen City Council, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43571 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2023),* adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42228 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2023).* A DEA stop of … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Criminal trespass warning is not a 4A seizure

D.S.C.: Lack of nexus to def isn’t grounds for motion to suppress; that’s a trial question

Lack of nexus between drugs and the defendant is an evidentiary question for trial, not a motion to suppress. The search is legal in any event. United States v. Cunningham, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43510 (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2023). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Open fields, Seizure | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Lack of nexus to def isn’t grounds for motion to suppress; that’s a trial question

OH5: EMT wasn’t state actor for 4A purposes in detaining def

A paramedic kept defendant from driving after an accident because defendant was too impaired to drive. That was not a government seizure, even if the paramedic was a state actor. State v. Cruz, 2023-Ohio-794, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 760 (5th … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: EMT wasn’t state actor for 4A purposes in detaining def

E.D.Mo.: A lien on property here is not a 4A seizure

A lien on property here is not a Fourth Amendment seizure. Trident Steel Corp. v. Siffin, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43138 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 15, 2023). “Against that backdrop, a reasonable officer could certainly have interpreted Mr. Harris’s sudden lurch … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: A lien on property here is not a 4A seizure

NY1: Announcing “NYPD arrest warrant” after entry through an unlocked door violated knock-and-announce

Announcing “NYPD arrest warrant” after entry through an unlocked door violated the state statute on knock-and-announce. People v. Jones, 2023 NY Slip Op 01262, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1248 (1st Dept. Mar. 14, 2023). A successor 2255 petition based … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: Announcing “NYPD arrest warrant” after entry through an unlocked door violated knock-and-announce

CA7: Def seen on his way to a controlled buy was PC

There was probable cause for the search of defendant’s car stopped on the way to a controlled buy. United States v. Coates, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 6108 (7th Cir. Mar. 15, 2023).* Unreasonable responses from defendant stopping at a salvage … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Def seen on his way to a controlled buy was PC

CA10: Overlong stop didn’t cause independent search incident

Defendant was subjected to a search incident for false identification. His overlong stop otherwise didn’t cause that. United States v. Anderson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 5997 (10th Cir. Mar. 14, 2023).* “Teixeira struggles to throw shade on the reliability of … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Independent source, Search incident, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA10: Overlong stop didn’t cause independent search incident