Author Archives: Hall

CA11: Change in strategy doesn’t excuse untimely motion to suppress

With second counsel, defendant filed a second motion to suppress apparently based on new strategy about how to approach one. The different strategy is not “good cause” based on newly discovered facts. United States v. Vazquez, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA11: Change in strategy doesn’t excuse untimely motion to suppress

S.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases. Villafane v. City of N.Y., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52149 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2023). There was probable cause for the search warrant for defendant’s DNA. United States v. Burkhalter, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

MA: Horizontal collective knowledge requires officers communicate with each other

Horizontal collective knowledge in Massachusetts requires the officers communicate with each other and share information. Commonwealth v. Privette, 2023 Mass. LEXIS 86 (Mar. 28, 2023):

Posted in Collective knowledge, State constitution | Comments Off on MA: Horizontal collective knowledge requires officers communicate with each other

W.D.N.C.: 2255 claim of merely failing to investigate a search claim doesn’t state a post-conviction claim

2255 petition’s claim that defense counsel failed to investigate whether a motion to suppress should have been filed fails. There was a search warrant, and there’s no suggestion it was invalid. Fluid v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51173 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: 2255 claim of merely failing to investigate a search claim doesn’t state a post-conviction claim

OH3: Threat to get a SW didn’t coerce consent where there was PC for one

Defendant was alleged to have consented to a blood draw in a DUI case. When he hesitated, the officer said that he’d get a search warrant if defendant didn’t go through with it. There’s a difference between the officer saying … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, State constitution, Voluntariness | Comments Off on OH3: Threat to get a SW didn’t coerce consent where there was PC for one

E.D.La.: Failure to cross-examination searching officers more wouldn’t change outcome

In a long super-detailed 2254 habeas, defendant loses on all issues. As to failure to cross-examine even more the searching officer about the details of execution of the search warrant, it was speculative that it would conceivably change the outcome. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Failure to cross-examination searching officers more wouldn’t change outcome

CO: LEOs didn’t expand on private search

A private party found video of a sexual assault on defendant’s computer and provided it to law enforcement. A search warrant wasn’t needed for law enforcement to view that file. People v. Morse, 2023 COA 27, 2023 Colo. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search, Seizure | Comments Off on CO: LEOs didn’t expand on private search

S.D.W.Va.: This border search of cell phone was routine, despite taking 4 hours

The border search of defendant’s cell phone was routine and reasonable and didn’t need reasonable suspicion. He provided the passcode, and the phone was on airplane mode so it did not go outside the phone. United States v. Tick Chin, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: This border search of cell phone was routine, despite taking 4 hours

CA7: Prima facie Franks violation made not disclosing CI’s motives; remanded

Defendant made his prima facie case of a Franks violation, and he was entitled to a hearing. The informants were involved in a love quadrangle not revealed to the warrant issuing judge. Analyzing the affidavit sentence by sentence, the omissions … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: Prima facie Franks violation made not disclosing CI’s motives; remanded

OH7: Officer seeing sawed-off shotgun in car door justified questions under Quarles

Defendant was stopped and got out of his car, and in the door was a sawed off shotgun. Questions about the gun next to him were legitimate under Quarles. State v. Anderson, 2023-Ohio-945, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 922 (7th Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH7: Officer seeing sawed-off shotgun in car door justified questions under Quarles

D.N.M.: Possession of a gun in car in Walmart parking lot wasn’t a crime and search for it under community caretaking function unreasonable

Police were called to a Walmart parking lot in Albuquerque because defendant was “unconscious” in his car in his car, and a gun was visible. The seizure of the gun and the interrogation surrounding it can’t be justified under the … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Curtilage, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Possession of a gun in car in Walmart parking lot wasn’t a crime and search for it under community caretaking function unreasonable

D.N.M.: Search warrants are directed at places, not persons; offender need not be mentioned

Search warrants are directed at places, not persons. “Because, at the time of the oral affidavit, there was a fair probability the crime of kidnapping occurred and a fair probability evidence of that crime would be found in Defendant’s home … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Search warrants are directed at places, not persons; offender need not be mentioned

IL: An investigative alert based on PC justifies a stop and then arrest

An investigative alert based on probable cause justifies a stop and then arrest. People v. Wimberly, 2023 IL App (1st) 220809, 2023 Ill. App. LEXIS 85 (Mar. 23, 2023). The government’s appellate concession the state search warrant was invalid results … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: An investigative alert based on PC justifies a stop and then arrest

N.D.Ga.: Failure to specify how the R&R was deficient on PC finding was waiver

“The Eleventh Circuit has made clear that a party must ‘pinpoint those portions of the magistrate’s report that the district court must specially consider.’ Schultz, 565 F.3d at 1361. Defendant has not done so here. In sum, Defendant’s one-sentence statement … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Failure to specify how the R&R was deficient on PC finding was waiver

Ga.Bar J.: Who Should Guard the Attorney-Client Privilege When Documents are Seized by Law Enforcement

Don Samuels & Scott Grumman, Who Should Guard the Attorney-Client Privilege When Documents are Seized by Law Enforcement, 28 Ga. Bar J. 19 (No. 4 Feb. 2023) (“Some cases may involve seizures of computers and other devices that contain millions … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Privileges | Comments Off on Ga.Bar J.: Who Should Guard the Attorney-Client Privilege When Documents are Seized by Law Enforcement

OR: For particularity in electronic devices, specify what will be found

In Oregon, “For searches of electronic devices, a warrant is specific enough to satisfy the particularity requirement if it ‘describe[s], with as much specificity as reasonably possible under the circumstances, what investigating officers believe will be found’ on the device, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Particularity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OR: For particularity in electronic devices, specify what will be found

W.D.N.C.: Traffic stop for expired tags went right to criminal history and was overlong

The court adopts the R&R and finds that the traffic stop was initially justified, but the officer got way off track from it into investigating other things without reasonable suspicion. Instead, the officer was investigating defendant’s criminal history for 46 … Continue reading →

Posted in Open fields, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Traffic stop for expired tags went right to criminal history and was overlong

ID rejects “reasonable mistake of law” and Heien under state constitution; state’s exclusionary rule is broader

Idaho declines to adopt the “reasonable mistake of law” rule and suppresses a search incident to a warrantless arrest for a completed misdemeanor. The state’s exclusionary rule isn’t just to deter illegal police misconduct – it is considerably more, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on ID rejects “reasonable mistake of law” and Heien under state constitution; state’s exclusionary rule is broader

CA6: Even if harassment was a basis to exclude a parole search, it wasn’t shown here

The exclusionary rule does not apply in supervised release revocation proceedings. Even if harassment by the officer was a basis to exclude, it wasn’t present here. United States v. Robinson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 6756 (6th Cir. Mar. 21, 2023)* … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Custody, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Even if harassment was a basis to exclude a parole search, it wasn’t shown here

ID: Drug dog putting feet on car door and window during stiff was a trespass on the chattel and the search should have been suppressed

A warrantless Fourth Amendment “search” occurred when the police drug-sniffing dog trespassed against defendant’s vehicle for the purpose of obtaining information about, or related to, the vehicle. When the dog approached the driver’s side on his second pass, he clearly … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search, Trespass | Comments Off on ID: Drug dog putting feet on car door and window during stiff was a trespass on the chattel and the search should have been suppressed