Author Archives: Hall

E.D.Mich.: Missing 14 yo cell phone pinging at def’s house was exigency for entry to find her

There was exigency for entry into defendant’s home when a missing autistic 14 year old’s cell phone was pinging at defendant’s address and there was no answer to the phone. Officers don’t have to wait for the exigency to get … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Missing 14 yo cell phone pinging at def’s house was exigency for entry to find her

CA3: Smell of MJ but none found can still be PC

The smell of marijuana is probable cause even if none is found in the subsequent search. The absence of marijuana only mitigates the probable cause, not eliminate it. United States v. Loveings, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 17330 (3d Cir. June … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Smell of MJ but none found can still be PC

Cal.4: SW not needed to test DNA abandoned in a rape

Defendant’s DNA left at the scene of two rapes was abandoned, and the state didn’t need a warrant to search it. People v. Konther, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 369 (4th Dist. June 12, 2026). In a drug case bench trial, … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Admissibility of evidence, DNA, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on Cal.4: SW not needed to test DNA abandoned in a rape

D.D.C.: Open container arrest justified search incident of backpack in passenger compartment

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and he had an open container in violation of D.C. law. That justified a search incident of the area around him, including a backpack. United States v. Smith, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131891 … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration arrests, Immigration checkpoints, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Open container arrest justified search incident of backpack in passenger compartment

404 Media: Cops Keep Getting Arrested for Using Flock to Stalk People

404 Media: Cops Keep Getting Arrested for Using Flock to Stalk People by Jason KoEbler (“There have been more than a dozen cases around the country where police use Flock to obsessively and illegally stalk people.”)

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on 404 Media: Cops Keep Getting Arrested for Using Flock to Stalk People

Cal.1: Entry by robot, drone, tear gas, and flash bang was with PC after def refused to come out on a SW and AW

To arrest the defendant on a warrant and with a search warrant, the SWAT team surrounded his house. They used a robot, drone, tear gas, and a flash bang sent into the apartment. He finally came out and surrendered. Despite … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.1: Entry by robot, drone, tear gas, and flash bang was with PC after def refused to come out on a SW and AW

CA8: Def’s connection to property searched was so tenuous he had no standing; no one claimed to know him

“Where the only witness testifying that defendant was an overnight guest (1) initially denied knowing defendant on the day of arrest, (2) had a prior conviction for filing a false police report, (3) could not provide basic information about defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Immigration arrests, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Def’s connection to property searched was so tenuous he had no standing; no one claimed to know him

D.Mass.: Inventory valid despite there being no impoundment policy

Despite the local police having no formal impoundment policy, defendant’s vehicle was impounded with their permission and inventoried by the FBI. The impoundment was still reasonable. United States v. Richards, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126028 (D. Mass. June 8, 2026). … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Inventory valid despite there being no impoundment policy

CA6: The smell of burnt MJ in a car is still PC for driving under influence even where personal possession is legal.

“Possession of recreational marijuana may be legal in Missouri, but ‘[o]perating or being in physical control of any motor vehicle … while under the influence of marijuana’ is not. Mo. Const. art. XIV § 2(3)(1)(d). Considering the strong odor of … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: The smell of burnt MJ in a car is still PC for driving under influence even where personal possession is legal.

CA2: Failure to read a SW isn’t a 4A violation without overseizure

Failure to read a warrant before execution isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation without an overseizure. The cell phone warrant here had search of the cell phone crossed out, permitting only seizure at first. The executing officers didn’t know it had … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA2: Failure to read a SW isn’t a 4A violation without overseizure

NY3: Cannabis stores are closely regulated businesses

Regulatory inspections of cannabis stores is reasonable and not a violation of the Fourth Amendment. They are closely regulated under Burger, and the extent of inspections is limited. Matter of Super Smoke N Save LLC v. N.Y. State Cannabis Control … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on NY3: Cannabis stores are closely regulated businesses

D.Haw.: It wasn’t objectively reasonable that def’s bag had been abandoned

It was not objectively reasonable for officers to believe that defendant’s blue bag was abandoned property when it was searched. They didn’t even have a good faith belief it was abandoned, so the motion to suppress is granted. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment | Comments Off on D.Haw.: It wasn’t objectively reasonable that def’s bag had been abandoned

D.R.I.: Defense attorney’s affidavit for Franks motion was insufficient for lack of personal knowledge

The defense attorney’s affidavit for defendant’s Franks motion is insufficient because he had no direct knowledge. There was probable cause for the warrant. United States v. Rosario, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125981 (D.R.I. June 8, 2026). Protective sweep for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Defense attorney’s affidavit for Franks motion was insufficient for lack of personal knowledge

Philadelphia Inquirer: Two Philadelphia police officers stopped hundreds of Black men on the street. Lawyers say the stops were illegal and racially biased.

Philadelphia Inquirer: Two Philadelphia police officers stopped hundreds of Black men on the street. Lawyers say the stops were illegal and racially biased. by Jillian Kramer (“Prosecutors have dismissed at least 24 firearms cases after defense lawyers challenged the legality … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Pretext, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on Philadelphia Inquirer: Two Philadelphia police officers stopped hundreds of Black men on the street. Lawyers say the stops were illegal and racially biased.

Reason: Iowa Man Seen in Viral Body Camera Footage Wins $105,000 Wrongful Arrest Lawsuit

Reason: Iowa Man Seen in Viral Body Camera Footage Wins $105,000 Wrongful Arrest Lawsuit by Autumn Billings (“After nearly four years of legal battles, Tayvin Galanakis has finally won his case against the officers who arrested him for allegedly driving … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Reason: Iowa Man Seen in Viral Body Camera Footage Wins $105,000 Wrongful Arrest Lawsuit

Wired: Wrongful Arrest Exposes Failures in One of the Oldest Police Face-Recognition Tools in the US

Wired: Wrongful Arrest Exposes Failures in One of the Oldest Police Face-Recognition Tools in the US by Dell Cameron (“A Florida man was wrongfully arrested for attempting to illegally lure a child after police relied on a face-recognition match that … Continue reading →

Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on Wired: Wrongful Arrest Exposes Failures in One of the Oldest Police Face-Recognition Tools in the US

W.D.Mo.: ALPR information helped support RS

There was reasonable suspicion for the dog sniff during this stop based on prior knowledge, a GPS placed with a prior warrant, and APLR reports of where the vehicle was that day showing it went where expected for alleged drug … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: ALPR information helped support RS

D.S.D.: If def testifies to show standing, he can be asked about his association with the drugs found

If defendant testifies at the suppression hearing to show his reasonable expectation of privacy, he opens the door to being asked about whether the drugs were his and his full association with the room [despite Simmons, which is not even … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on D.S.D.: If def testifies to show standing, he can be asked about his association with the drugs found

IL: A backpack is not as personal a repository of stuff as a purse or wallet; officers ordered it left in vehicle for safety reasons and it was inventoried

Defendant’s backpack is not as much a personal repository as a wallet or purse. When officers ordered the occupants out of the car, the backpack was at defendant’s feet, and he was ordered to leave it behind. The inventory was … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IL: A backpack is not as personal a repository of stuff as a purse or wallet; officers ordered it left in vehicle for safety reasons and it was inventoried

DE: Cell phone SW was limited by time and data sought, so it was not a general warrant

The warrant for defendant’s cell phone was not for “any and all data,” and it was limited to a specific time frame, July 20, 2020 to November 30, 2021. Officers found a video of defendant having sex with a minor. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Cell site location information | Comments Off on DE: Cell phone SW was limited by time and data sought, so it was not a general warrant