DE: Cell phone SW was limited by time and data sought, so it was not a general warrant

The warrant for defendant’s cell phone was not for “any and all data,” and it was limited to a specific time frame, July 20, 2020 to November 30, 2021. Officers found a video of defendant having sex with a minor. The warrant was reasonable. Clark v. State, 2026 Del. LEXIS 216 (June 8, 2026).

There was probable cause for length of time for the CSLI for a string of Hobbs Act robberies. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Harris, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124807 (N.D. Ill. June 5, 2026).*

Pro se plaintiff’s combined Title VII and § 1983 claim fail to state a claim. Merely because defendant was a former police officer, his actions aren’t state action. Gonzalez v. Asurion Ins. Servs., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78913 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 10, 2026),* adopted 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123421 (W.D. Tex. June 4, 2026).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Cell site location information. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.