Author Archives: Hall

NY Suffolk Co.: Entry under Extreme Risk Protection Order statute for potential suicide was exigent

“The Court finds that the search conducted pursuant to the E[xtreme] R[isk] P[rotection] O[rder] statute was reasonable. P.O. Keenan provided sworn testimony as to the basis for his belief that defendant was expressing suicidal ideations (defendant’s text messages), and recounted … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Suffolk Co.: Entry under Extreme Risk Protection Order statute for potential suicide was exigent

E.D.Pa.: Driver’s failure to laugh at odd question during stop not RS

Defendant’s failure to laugh at the question of whether he had “firearms, drugs, cats, dogs, alligators, and weapons” in his vehicle stop was not reasonable suspicion. United States v. Holloway, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187752 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2023):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Driver’s failure to laugh at odd question during stop not RS

M.D.Pa.: State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn’t cognizable in a 2254

State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn’t cognizable in a 2254. McDowell v. Hainesworth, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187496 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2023). Petitioner doesn’t get a CoA to appeal his 2255. He provides no basis for concluding … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: State law jurisdiction of the officers involved isn’t cognizable in a 2254

E.D.Ky.: Seizure of car key from around def’s neck to search glovebox was with PC

Seizure of defendant’s car key from around his neck to open glove compartment was with probable cause to search the car interior. His cell phone was also seized and then searched with a warrant. It is not challenged. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Seizure of car key from around def’s neck to search glovebox was with PC

S.D.N.Y.: Def doesn’t show Colombia wiretap was U.S. instigated

Defendants produced nothing to show that U.S. officers enlisted Colombian officers to wiretap their phones there. United States v. Ruiz, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186612 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 16, 2023).* Just because there were discrepancies between the testimony at the suppression … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Def doesn’t show Colombia wiretap was U.S. instigated

E.D.Wis.: Text and Facebook messages about crime justified warrant for them

In a health care fraud case, the government knew that messages about the crime were exchanged by text and Facebook, and that was sufficient to get a search warrant for them. In any event, the good faith exception applied. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Text and Facebook messages about crime justified warrant for them

E.D.Wis.: No REP in common area of apt building, despite state law to contrary

Rejecting state law to the contrary, the district court holds that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the common area of an apartment building under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Love, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186921 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: No REP in common area of apt building, despite state law to contrary

OR: State const. doesn’t bar checking for warrants during traffic stop

Officers are not prohibited under the state constitution from checking for outstanding warrants during a traffic stop, during a lull or not. There are valid safety and policy reasons for it. State v. Civil, 328 Or App 662, 2023 Ore. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: State const. doesn’t bar checking for warrants during traffic stop

OH5: No showing of PC and no GFE for SW for Google search history

The search warrant for defendant’s Google search history lacked any justification of why it would produce evidence, that it was even used in planning or executing the alleged crime. It was bare bones, and the good faith exception does not … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: No showing of PC and no GFE for SW for Google search history

S.D.Ill.: Justification for a protective sweep remained despite 10 hour wait outside

Despite officers waiting outside for about ten hours and seeing no movement from inside, a protective sweep was still objectively reasonable on the totality. People were unaccounted for, and there was a gun and drugs seen from outside the door. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Justification for a protective sweep remained despite 10 hour wait outside

MI: Long Lake Twp. v. Maxon drone case argued today

The Traverse City MI drone flyover case goes before the Michigan Supreme Court today at 10 am ET. The oral argument link: 164948 Long Lake Township v Todd Maxon. See, e.g., Law360: Mich. Top Court To Decide If Drone Searches … Continue reading →

Posted in Drones, Trespass | Comments Off on MI: Long Lake Twp. v. Maxon drone case argued today

CO: REP in Google search history which also implicates freedom of expression

“First, the court concludes that, under the Colorado Constitution, the defendant has a constitutionally protected privacy interest in his Google search history even when revealed only in connection with his IP address and not his name and that, under both … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CO: REP in Google search history which also implicates freedom of expression

E.D.Tex.: Pretextual claim of emergency aid exception to conduct a drug search leads to suppression

Defendant was having a seizure in his underwear on the street, about two blocks from his home. Officers could tell the smell of PCP about him. Officers went to his house and the door was cracked. Looking through the door, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk, Pretext | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Pretextual claim of emergency aid exception to conduct a drug search leads to suppression

E.D.Wis: Faced with motion to suppress DNA evidence, govt can seek it again

The government obtained DNA and defendant moved to suppress. Then the government sought DNA by warrant again with a new warrant. It is permitted to do so. United States v. Watson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185148 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 16, … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Independent source, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on E.D.Wis: Faced with motion to suppress DNA evidence, govt can seek it again

PA: State obligated to raise all possible issues in defense of warrantless search in trial court

The state is obliged to raise whatever issues it can in defense of a warrantless search at the hearing. Piecemeal litigation by motion to reconsider must be avoided. Commonwealth v. Smith, 2023 PA Super 205, 2023 Pa. Super. LEXIS 482 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Prison and jail searches, Staleness | Comments Off on PA: State obligated to raise all possible issues in defense of warrantless search in trial court

D.Idaho: Parole search condition justified extending the stop

There was reasonable suspicion for continuing the stop, then probable cause. “Even absent probable cause, the search of Mr. Watson’s car was permissible as a search pursuant to a parole condition.” That alone justified extending the stop. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Parole search condition justified extending the stop

E.D.Pa.: Officer’s question about firearms in car made def unreasonably nervous

During a traffic stop, the officer’s question about weapons in the car resulted in defendant’s getting unusually nervous, his breathing completely changing where his chest rose and fell, and he refused to look the officer in the eye. That was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Officer’s question about firearms in car made def unreasonably nervous

WSJ: How Ads on Your Phone Can Aid Government Surveillance

WSJ: How Ads on Your Phone Can Aid Government Surveillance by Byron Tau, Andrew Mollica, Patience Haggis, and Dustin Volz (“Information from mobile-phone apps and advertising networks paints a richly detailed portrait of the online activities of billions of devices. … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WSJ: How Ads on Your Phone Can Aid Government Surveillance

WI: Forensic search of electronics two months after seizure didn’t violate state statute on execution of SW

A search warrant was timely “executed” when the electronic device was seized within five days per the warrant and state law, even though the forensic search didn’t take place for two more months. “[W]e emphasize that in this appeal Drachenberg … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WI: Forensic search of electronics two months after seizure didn’t violate state statute on execution of SW

E.D.Mich.: CA6 previously suggested cell phone on drug trafficker was nexus to evidence, so GFE at least applied

The Sixth Circuit has suggested that a cell phone on the person of a drug trafficker likely has evidence of drug trafficking on it, so the cell phone warrant was issued with probable cause. Even if not, the good faith … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: CA6 previously suggested cell phone on drug trafficker was nexus to evidence, so GFE at least applied