D.Idaho: Parole search condition justified extending the stop

There was reasonable suspicion for continuing the stop, then probable cause. “Even absent probable cause, the search of Mr. Watson’s car was permissible as a search pursuant to a parole condition.” That alone justified extending the stop. United States v. Watson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184812 (D. Idaho Oct. 13, 2023).

The officer was justified in ordering the occupants out of the vehicle while completing the stop. He had probable cause to search the vehicle for alcohol given the smell coming from inside and that the passenger essentially admitted consuming alcohol in it. Defendant’s hesitation following the officer’s lawful request to exit the vehicle, combined with the fact that he had a large bulge in his front jacket pocket, was reasonable suspicion for a frisk. People v. Wallace, 2023 IL App (1st) 200917, 2023 Ill. App. LEXIS 350 (Sep. 29, 2023).*

The administrative subpoena duces tecum for one of the doctor’s patient files was reasonable because it related to a complaint about treatment. In addition, the doctor’s interest in confidentiality of the file is maintained because the public can’t see it with the medical board. Frid v. McDonald, 2023 NY Slip Op 33482(U), 2023 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 7442 (N.Y. Co. Oct. 8, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.