Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Ala.: 4A does not require gun seen in protective sweep be immediately seized; SW was obtained

If officers saw defendant’s .22 during a protective sweep, the Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that it be seized immediately. It can be seized during execution of the later issued search warrant. A .22 is not a weapon of choice for … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: 4A does not require gun seen in protective sweep be immediately seized; SW was obtained

CA11: Mandamus not remedy to overcome waived 2255

Petitioner waived his 2255 and can’t raise his Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim by mandamus. In re Morgan, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 28330 (11th Cir. Oct. 24, 2023). The sheriff solicited nude pictures of a person that became … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on CA11: Mandamus not remedy to overcome waived 2255

Reason: Government Misuse of Data Rightly Worries Americans

Reason: Government Misuse of Data Rightly Worries Americans by J.D. Tuccille (“Federal agencies frequently buy their way around the Fourth Amendment.”) But not Congress.

Posted in Digital privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: Government Misuse of Data Rightly Worries Americans

D.D.C.: Telling def the SW for his phone required his passcode was unreasonable because it didn’t

Defendant was in U.S. diplomatic service in Mexico, and he was accused of sex with drugged women there. Proof was ultimately found on his phone with a search warrant on his return to the U.S. Officers returned to his hotel … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Telling def the SW for his phone required his passcode was unreasonable because it didn’t

N.D.Ind.: Def put drugs in a confederate’s car, and he had no standing despite being the target of the search

Defendant put drugs in bags in the car of a confederate in the crime. When the car was searched, he didn’t have standing, even though he was admittedly the target of the search and not in possession. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Def put drugs in a confederate’s car, and he had no standing despite being the target of the search

Real Clear Policy: Just the Facts on ‘Geofencing’

Real Clear Policy: Just the Facts on ‘Geofencing’ by Maggie MacFarland Phillips (“As worshippers gathered at the Calvary Chapel in 2020, they were being watched from above. [¶] Satellites were locking in on cell phones owned by members of the … Continue reading →

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Real Clear Policy: Just the Facts on ‘Geofencing’

N.D.Ga.: No justification shown for geolocation data of def’s phone

The affidavit for geolocation data about defendant’s phone showed no nexus to crime. Merely having a cell phone on you at the time of a crime doesn’t provide justification. United States v. Cable, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190357 (N.D. Ga. … Continue reading →

Posted in Geolocation data | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No justification shown for geolocation data of def’s phone

NY: Inventory policies don’t have to be in writing to be reasonable

“There is no requirement that an inventory search protocol be written …, and courts will not ‘micromanage the procedures used to search properly impounded cars’ … ‘[R]easonable police regulations relating to inventory procedures administered in good faith satisfy the Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Geolocation data, Inventory | Comments Off on NY: Inventory policies don’t have to be in writing to be reasonable

techdirt: How The Courts Have Made It Easier For Cops To Steal From Citizens

techdirt: How The Courts Have Made It Easier For Cops To Steal From Citizens by Tim Cushing (“It’s always been easy for cops to take stuff from people. Civil asset forfeiture allows law enforcement to bypass most of the Constitution … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture | Comments Off on techdirt: How The Courts Have Made It Easier For Cops To Steal From Citizens

TN: Trial court erred in deciding no standing where state didn’t argue that

The trial court decided the suppression issue on lack of standing when the state conceded standing and argued the merits of the search. Reversed for another suppression hearing. State v. Richards, 2023 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 430 (Oct. 23, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Trial court erred in deciding no standing where state didn’t argue that

CA6: State issuing magistrate’s failure to transcribe supplemental information for PC was not enough to suppress

The affidavit and supplementing testimony provided substantial probable cause for issuance of the warrant. State law requires any testimony supplementing a search warrant affidavit be preserved and transcribed. The state issuing magistrate failed. The officer, however, acted in good faith, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Immigration arrests, Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA6: State issuing magistrate’s failure to transcribe supplemental information for PC was not enough to suppress

CA6: 911 calls about dangerous situation satisfied Navarette

The information from 911 callers was detailed and explained a dangerous situation, and reasonable suspicion existed under Navarette. United States v. Duplessis, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 27980 (6th Cir. Oct. 19, 2023).* “Here, Jordan asked whether Hammond would mind if … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: 911 calls about dangerous situation satisfied Navarette

C.D.Cal.: That state arrest warrant was unsigned is not a 4A violation

A violation of state law on arrest warrant papers doesn’t per se make a Fourth Amendment violation. “There is no Fourth Amendment requirement that a state criminal complaint for an arrest warrant be signed, or even that the warrant itself … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: That state arrest warrant was unsigned is not a 4A violation

Bitcoin.com: Report Exposes Warrantless Cash Searches at Atlanta Airport

Bitcoin.com: Report Exposes Warrantless Cash Searches at Atlanta Airport by Jamie Redman (“In a startling investigation report, Atlanta News First uncovered the concerning practices of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) task force officers. At Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, DEA … Continue reading →

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on Bitcoin.com: Report Exposes Warrantless Cash Searches at Atlanta Airport

IL: In this forfeiture seizure, the car could not be inventoried; contents were to be returned to the owner

Officers attempted a stop of a vehicle potentially involved in an earlier occurrence. Instead of stopping, the driver fled from the stop in the car. Instead of pursuing, officers had the LPN and went to where it was registered, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Forfeiture, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on IL: In this forfeiture seizure, the car could not be inventoried; contents were to be returned to the owner

S.D.N.Y.: Arrested target of cell phone SW has common law right of access to affidavit and SW

The target’s motion to unseal the search warrant affidavit for his cell phone is granted. There is a common law right of access, and the First Amendment right of access does not even have to be decided. The government’s only … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Arrested target of cell phone SW has common law right of access to affidavit and SW

NC: Search incident doesn’t apply to hit-and-run; automobile exception didn’t apply to car partly submerged in ditch

Defendant was the passenger in a car owned by her parents involved in a hit-and-run that fled the scene and ended up in a ditch. The driver ran off because he said he had warrants. She gave the driver’s name. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on NC: Search incident doesn’t apply to hit-and-run; automobile exception didn’t apply to car partly submerged in ditch

CA9: Drug dog entering vehicle after alert not unreasonable

The drug dog entering defendant’s vehicle after the alert is not unreasonable. An Idaho state CSLI warrant served outside of Idaho was not an issue for federal court. Even if the court agreed that there was a technical violation of … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell site location information, Dog sniff, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Drug dog entering vehicle after alert not unreasonable

D.N.M.: Police entry into a fire damaged home after fire was out and it was “all clear” violated 4A

There was a kitchen fire in defendant’s home, and firefighters told the police that there were unsecured handguns in the house. A police aide entered the house without a warrant and took them. The government argues the house was abandoned … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency, Waiver | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Police entry into a fire damaged home after fire was out and it was “all clear” violated 4A

TX5: A safe removed from a car under the automobile exception was subject to search without a warrant

A safe removed from a car that was otherwise subject to search under the automobile exception was still subject to a warrantless search after it was removed and taken to the police station. Defendant’s effort to compare it to a … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX5: A safe removed from a car under the automobile exception was subject to search without a warrant