Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

Merely scrolling through an electronic device at the border is a reasonable border search. United States v. Vrdoljak, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208332 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 20, 2023). The officer was incidentally following defendant, and he observed her driving within … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Scrolling through electronic devices at the border is reasonable in CA11

NC: Officer who made illegal entry was not discharging “official duty” when he was assaulted

“As a warrant was required for the officers to lawfully enter the home, and no warrant had been issued when the officers entered the home and encountered Defendant, the officers’ entry into the home was unlawful. Thus, the State failed … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on NC: Officer who made illegal entry was not discharging “official duty” when he was assaulted

LA4: CI’s success rate not important when CI corroborated by controlled buy

The affidavit for the warrant here did, in fact, show probable cause and nexus from the informant’s reports corroborated by observations of the officers. The lack of a success rate by the CI wasn’t as important when he was corroborated … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on LA4: CI’s success rate not important when CI corroborated by controlled buy

CA11: The bodycam video showed the altercation with ptf and hospital security was reasonable

The bodycam video of plaintiff’s altercation with two hospital security guards showed they were entitled to qualified immunity. Scott v. Harris. Bouvier v. City of Covington, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 30822 (11th Cir. Nov. 20, 2023).* In excessive force cases, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: The bodycam video showed the altercation with ptf and hospital security was reasonable

NY Erie Co.: Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order didn’t satisfy 4A for criminal case

An officer sought a Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order (TERPO) under NYS law for defendant’s allegedly pointing a gun at his alleged victims from a car. This is a civil remedy, and, here, it did not provide any protection under … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on NY Erie Co.: Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order didn’t satisfy 4A for criminal case

WV: SW for items that are also common to any home doesn’t make warrant general; it’s specific enough

Officers had two search warrants for Gray’s place, and defendant complained that the warrant described things common to any home. There was probable cause for that stuff, and there’s no requirement of a more specific description. State v. Knotts, 2023 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Cell site location information, Particularity | Comments Off on WV: SW for items that are also common to any home doesn’t make warrant general; it’s specific enough

CA11: Def claims he was talking with a VA clinician, but it was a CI; no REP in conversation

Defendant was ultimately accused of theft of government funds and false statements about his VA benefits. A phone call with an informant was recorded. He claims he thought it was a clinician with whom he had a reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on CA11: Def claims he was talking with a VA clinician, but it was a CI; no REP in conversation

N.D.Iowa: Even though stop showed def wasn’t impaired, DL and LPN could still be run

Even though defendant apparently wasn’t driving impaired, once validly stopped, the officer could run DL and LPN checks. The dog sniff didn’t prolong the stop at all. United States v. Drayton, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206461 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 10, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Even though stop showed def wasn’t impaired, DL and LPN could still be run

IA: Shining flashlights or patrol car spotlights on driver in an already parked car is not a seizure

Defendant was seen driving fast in a parking lot near a bar after 2 am. Officers parked near him and approached on foot. They shined their flashlights on the driver from both sides. The use of flashlights was not a … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IA: Shining flashlights or patrol car spotlights on driver in an already parked car is not a seizure

D.Mass.: Plea agreement foreclosed return of property

Defendant’s plea agreement foreclosed his Rule 41(g) motion for return of property. United States v. Spencer, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206257 (D. Mass. Nov. 17, 2023). Defendant’s motion to reconsider denial of his motion to suppress the timeliness of his … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Motion to suppress, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Plea agreement foreclosed return of property

N.D.Cal.: No REP in a computer possessed in a halfway house

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a computer given him by Goodwill for whom he worked while he was living in a halfway house. He was still an inmate of the BOP. “There is no reasonable or legitimate … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: No REP in a computer possessed in a halfway house

UT: Being hospitalized having been shot by police isn’t “custody” for Miranda purposes

A person hospitalized after having been shot by the police is not per se “in custody” for Miranda purposes. The reason for the shooting was the safety of the officers and others, not custody. Tennessee v. Garner isn’t even close, … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Custody, Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on UT: Being hospitalized having been shot by police isn’t “custody” for Miranda purposes

CA7: Hospital medical staff getting def to spit out machine gun part wasn’t search and they weren’t govt actors

Defendant had a Glock fully auto switch in his mouth while in the hospital. While treating him, the medical staff finally got him to spit it out. That was not a search. The medical staff were not government actors for … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Private search, Search, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: Hospital medical staff getting def to spit out machine gun part wasn’t search and they weren’t govt actors

S.D.N.Y.: If the SW lacks PC, the remedy is a motion to suppress, not a motion to rescind the SW via 41(g)

Defendant filed a motion for the court to rescind the search warrant for his cell phone under Rule 41(g) because it was allegedly defective. The remedy is a motion to suppress, not to rescind. United States v. Cardenas, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: If the SW lacks PC, the remedy is a motion to suppress, not a motion to rescind the SW via 41(g)

NYT: Talks on Surveillance Law Simmer as Its Expiration Date Looms

NYT: Talks on Surveillance Law Simmer as Its Expiration Date Looms by Charlie Savage (“Negotiations in Congress over a warrantless surveillance law are intensifying as it nears its expiration date. The debate has come during what national security officials say … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on NYT: Talks on Surveillance Law Simmer as Its Expiration Date Looms

The Intercept: LexisNexis Sold Powerful Spy Tools to U.S. Customs and Border Protection

The Intercept: LexisNexis Sold Powerful Spy Tools to U.S. Customs and Border Protection by Sam Biddle (“The data brokerage giant sold face recognition, phone tracking, and other surveillance technology to the border guards, say government documents.”)

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on The Intercept: LexisNexis Sold Powerful Spy Tools to U.S. Customs and Border Protection

D.Haw.: State officers allegedly violating state law in warrant process or execution irrelevant under 4A

The fact state officers might have violated state law in executing the warrant wasn’t material to the Fourth Amendment reasonableness requirement. United States v. Miske, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203981 (D. Haw. Nov. 14, 2023).* There was reasonable suspicion or … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Haw.: State officers allegedly violating state law in warrant process or execution irrelevant under 4A

E.D.Mo.: Inventory of car totaled in flight from police was reasonable on totality

The inventory of defendant’s car after he totaled it fleeing from the police in a wreck was reasonable on the totality. Defendant argued that inventory was improper just from curiosity. United States v. Twiggs, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204654 (E.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Immigration arrests, Inventory, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Inventory of car totaled in flight from police was reasonable on totality

Lexology: Outlier or Trend? A Possible Narrowing of the Border Search Exception for Electronic Devices

Lexology: Outlier or Trend? A Possible Narrowing of the Border Search Exception for Electronic Devices (“As we wrote in a note back in December 2020, the border search exception to the Fourth Amendment is a powerful investigative tool relied on … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on Lexology: Outlier or Trend? A Possible Narrowing of the Border Search Exception for Electronic Devices

S.D.Cal.: A pending forfeiture action in another district justifies dismissal of Rule 41(g) motion because there is another remedy

This is a Rule 41(g) action for return of property, a superyacht owned by a Russian oligarch seized allegedly in violation of Russian sanctions. The next day, a forfeiture action was filed in the S.D.N.Y., and that provided an adequate … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: A pending forfeiture action in another district justifies dismissal of Rule 41(g) motion because there is another remedy