Author Archives: Hall

NE: Return of property denied where post-conviction time hadn’t run

Defendant’s motion for return of property is denied because the time hasn’t run for post-conviction and it still may be needed by the state. State v. Assad, 317 Neb. 20 (July 5, 2024). Defendant did not present a real Franks … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on NE: Return of property denied where post-conviction time hadn’t run

MI: The officer’s contact with def alone in a “high crime” area wasn’t RS

The officer here approached defendant in his parked car in an apartment complex parking lot without reasonable suspicion to inquire of what he was doing there. That ultimately led to an assault charge. Summarily reversed and dismissed without argument: There … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: The officer’s contact with def alone in a “high crime” area wasn’t RS

NJ: Entry into garage to make a DUI arrest violated 4A and state const.

Defendant was convicted of DUI. Acting on a tip of erratic driving by a particular LPN, the officer went into her garage and entered it to investigate and then make the arrest. There were no exigent circumstances like a medical … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NJ: Entry into garage to make a DUI arrest violated 4A and state const.

W.D.Ky.: Delayed search of a computer was not unreasonable under either 4A or Rule 41(e)(2)(B)

The delayed search of defendant’s computer was not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment or Rule 41(e)(2)(B) because it wasn’t practical to do so at the scene. United States v. White, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117526 (W.D. Ky. July 3, 2024).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Delayed search of a computer was not unreasonable under either 4A or Rule 41(e)(2)(B)

W.D.Pa.: US Private Vaults safety deposit boxes in California could be inventoried by FBI leading to case here

The FBI obtained a search warrant for the premises at US Private Vaults in Beverly Hills, California. The probable cause was based on a belief USPV was engaged in money laundering. The FBI went further and inventoried the safety deposit … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: US Private Vaults safety deposit boxes in California could be inventoried by FBI leading to case here

CA8: Breaking a cell phone to avoid its search and seizure justified obstruction enhancement under USSG § 3C1.1

Defendant attempting to thwart a search of cell phones in his car tried to break one such that it had to be forensically reviewed to get information off of it. He wasn’t under arrest. Still, his actions qualified for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Video surveillance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Breaking a cell phone to avoid its search and seizure justified obstruction enhancement under USSG § 3C1.1

S.D.Ga.: State knock-and-announce statute, if it applies at all, doesn’t confer standing on an alleged guest

Plaintiff said she was an overnight guest at the house searched and thus had standing, except that was never proved. “None of those facts are present here, as there is no record evidence showing that James had personal belongings in … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: State knock-and-announce statute, if it applies at all, doesn’t confer standing on an alleged guest

CA9: 4A claim of manufactured PC is a new form of Bivens claim and is barred

Plaintiff’s complaint against DHS that agents fabricated probable cause to have him prosecuted is a new form of claim Bivens will not recognize. Sheikh v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16441 (9th Cir. July 5, 2024). … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: 4A claim of manufactured PC is a new form of Bivens claim and is barred

CA5: The fact the officer was in an interstate highway drug interdiction team was unavailing because there was a lawful basis for the stop

“Rocha Nevarez’s argument that the stop was unlawful from the start because the trooper was part of a roving drug interdiction team is unavailing. The state trooper witnessed Rocha Nevarez drift over the fog line on eastbound Interstate 20 on … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: The fact the officer was in an interstate highway drug interdiction team was unavailing because there was a lawful basis for the stop

NY4: Cell phone SW suppressed for no showing of PC or particularity

“Here, the search warrant authorized and directed the police to search for, inter alia, ‘cellular phones (including contents)’ located in defendant’s vehicle. Significantly, the search was not restricted by reference to any particular crime. Thus, the search warrant failed to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY4: Cell phone SW suppressed for no showing of PC or particularity

DE: Def counsel’s failure to challenge PC and particularity in cell phone search warrants post-conviction relief

Defendant sufficiently stated grounds for ineffective assistance of counsel from defense counsel’s failure to challenge the search warrant for lack of probable cause and particularity. “Postconviction relief due to ineffectiveness of counsel must be granted in circumstances where the Court … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Custody, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on DE: Def counsel’s failure to challenge PC and particularity in cell phone search warrants post-conviction relief

D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

On remand in Torres v. Madrid, 141 S. Ct. 989, 209 L.Ed.2d 190 (Mar. 25, 2021), the defendant’s summary judgment motion is denied. Torres v. Madrid, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117079 (D.N.M. July 2, 2024).* An out-of-state temporary plate where … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Summary judgment for defs denied in Torres v. Madrid on remand

NC: Wife had sufficient common authority over cell phone to consent to seizure and search

Defendant allowed his cell phone to be used by everyone in the family, including his child to watch YouTube videos. His wife had sufficient common authority to consent to a seizure and search. State v. Duran-Rivas, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Wife had sufficient common authority over cell phone to consent to seizure and search

W.D.N.C.: Search under automobile exception can be as broad as a SW would allow considering what is sought

When there is probable cause under the automobile exception, the search can be as broad as a search warrant would allow. United States v. Carmichael, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116946 (W.D.N.C. July 1, 2024). The protective sweep of defendant’s hotel … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Mail and packages, Protective sweep, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Search under automobile exception can be as broad as a SW would allow considering what is sought

The good faith exception: United States v. Leon decided 40 years ago today

United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 104 S. Ct. 3405, 82 L. Ed. 2d 677 (July 5, 1984). It made my job easier. It’s far easier to tell whether an affidavit for search warrant will survive a motion to suppress. 1) … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on The good faith exception: United States v. Leon decided 40 years ago today

CA2: Briefly seeing occupants of a house searched nude was not unreasonable

Under Los Angeles County v. Rettele, plaintiffs’ nude exposure to searching officers during a raid on a home wasn’t unreasonable. Jury verdict for defendants affirmed. Also, this was not a strip search. Miller v. City of N.Y., 2024 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonableness, Strip search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA2: Briefly seeing occupants of a house searched nude was not unreasonable

CA4: Officers with arrest warrant for def could enter yard of property they knew he was visiting to arrest him; plain view sustained

Defendant was a social visitor, not a business visitor, and his standing is more like Olson than Carter. The district court erred in finding no standing. On the merits, however, he loses on a ground fully litigated but not decided … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Officers with arrest warrant for def could enter yard of property they knew he was visiting to arrest him; plain view sustained

The Guardian: Detroit changes rules for police use of facial recognition after wrongful arrest of Black man

The Guardian: Detroit changes rules for police use of facial recognition after wrongful arrest of Black man by AP (“ City to pay $300,000 to Robert Williams, whose driver’s license was incorrectly flagged in shoplifting investigation” “Detroit police will be … Continue reading →

Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on The Guardian: Detroit changes rules for police use of facial recognition after wrongful arrest of Black man

W.D.Wash.: State admin. health and safety SW against private ICE jail not enjoined

The State of Washington got an administrative search warrant for a workplace inspection of a private jail operating for immigration. The jail sought federal removal and an injunction which is denied. Washington state law requires these workplace inspections, and GEO’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Ineffective assistance, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: State admin. health and safety SW against private ICE jail not enjoined

D.Mass.: Owner of vehicle not in it can’t challenge stop, but he can the inventory which was unreasonable

The owner of a vehicle who was not driving or in it when it was stopped has no standing to challenge the stop as opposed to an inventory search. “After considering, as it must, ‘all the facts and circumstances’ of … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Owner of vehicle not in it can’t challenge stop, but he can the inventory which was unreasonable