Monthly Archives: November 2025

NBC: Top military lawyer raised legal concerns about boat strikes

NBC: Top military lawyer raised legal concerns about boat strikes by Gordon Lubold, Courtney Kube and Dan De Luce (“The lawyer at U.S. Southern Command, which oversees the operations against alleged drug-smuggling boats near Venezuela, disagreed that the strikes are … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Foreign searches | Comments Off on NBC: Top military lawyer raised legal concerns about boat strikes

CA1: Lobstering is a closely-regulated industry

Lobstering is a closely regulated industry, and GPS tracking of lobster boats by the State of Maine is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Thompson v. Wilson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30135 (1st Cir. Nov. 18, 2025) (appellant first conceded that … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on CA1: Lobstering is a closely-regulated industry

S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

A murder for hire scheme was exigency for a warrantless search. Here, the officers thought the firearm would be moved imminently on December 31, 2024, but the warrant wasn’t signed until after midnight January 1, 2025. It wasn’t automatically stale, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Murder for hire scheme was exigency for entry; SW issued a day late not automatically stale

AR: Warrantless entry under 12-year-old drug abatement search order never before challenged was in good faith, despite 4A violation

There was a drug abatement order from 2011 for an apartment area in Jonesboro, Arkansas. A sign warned of warrantless residential searches. The JPD street crimes unit saw several men standing outside defendant’s apartment. Marijuana could be smelled, and they … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on AR: Warrantless entry under 12-year-old drug abatement search order never before challenged was in good faith, despite 4A violation

LA: Communal parking area at a “trailer park” was not curtilage

Defendant’s car in a “trailer park” communal parking area near his place was not on his “curtilage.” The court of appeals erred in finding it was curtilage. State v. Charles, 2025 La. LEXIS 1624 (Nov. 19, 2025). “Here, the renewed … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LA: Communal parking area at a “trailer park” was not curtilage

CA5: Overnight guest’s stuff subject to search under warrant for premises

Defendant was an overnight guest at the place searched, and the officers executing a warrant were authorized to search her stuff, too. United States v. Inyang, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30148 (5th Cir. Nov. 18, 2025). Undercover officer’s recording in … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA5: Overnight guest’s stuff subject to search under warrant for premises

E.D.Mich.: Seeing handgun reasonably led to handcuffing to see if def had permit on him

Officers suspected defendant was carrying a weapon, and they saw it as they approached. Under state law, he had to have the permit on him. “So, were the officers’ following actions (handcuffing Pettes and putting him in the squad car) … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Seeing handgun reasonably led to handcuffing to see if def had permit on him

M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

In this false arrest case, the sheriff admitted he had no training in the Fourth Amendment. Harris v. Breeden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225584 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2025). The frisk here was without reasonable suspicion, including the bag defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

Under Kansas statute, only KHP officers can randomly stop regulated trucks for inspection, and it can’t be delegated to county sheriffs by an MOU. “There is no dispute here that regulation of commercial motor carriers triggers a substantial government interest.” … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Waiver | Comments Off on KS: KHP power for administrative searches of truck can’t be delegated to sheriffs

MSNOW: ICE’s biometric dragnet is a 21st century general warrant for your body

MSNOW: ICE’s biometric dragnet is a 21st century general warrant for your body by Robert Frommer (Detained persons are having DNA, fingerprints, and photographs collected despite no charges (“In addition to our DNA, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has … Continue reading

Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on MSNOW: ICE’s biometric dragnet is a 21st century general warrant for your body

PR: No REP in property where def not entitled to be

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in property where the defendant isn’t entitled to be, abandoned or otherwise unoccupied. El Pueblo v. Rondón, 2025 TSPR 113 (Nov. 4, 2025). (translation by Lexis) The stop of this known felon was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PR: No REP in property where def not entitled to be

S.D.Fla.: 16 shot ShotSpotter alert confirmed by witnesses was exigency to enter curtilage

A ShotSpotter alert of 16 gunshots from the vicinity of defendant’s home confirmed by witnesses in a car leaving the area was justification for exigent entry onto the curtilage. “Since the addition of the omitted information does not disturb the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: 16 shot ShotSpotter alert confirmed by witnesses was exigency to enter curtilage

CA11: TSA officers are LEOs for searches under the FTCA

TSA officers are law enforcement officers for searches under the FTCA. Five other circuits hold that. Koletas v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29609 (11th Cir. Nov. 12, 2025). While each factor here isn’t reasonable suspicion on its own, … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: TSA officers are LEOs for searches under the FTCA

IA: Refusing to get out of the car when directed is RS

Note to sov cits: Refusing to get out of the car when directed is reasonable suspicion. State v. Carter, 2025 Iowa App. LEXIS 983 (Nov. 13, 2025).* “Even the most seemingly trivial traffic infraction or equipment violation gives a peace … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA: Refusing to get out of the car when directed is RS

E.D.N.Y.: SW for cell phone at border after warrantless search was reasonable

CBP seized and searched defendant’s cell phones at the border under existing authority. After subsequent case law called that into question, the government sought a search warrant for the phones disclosing all the facts. The subsequent warrant was valid. United … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: SW for cell phone at border after warrantless search was reasonable

D.D.C.: Govt failed to prove area was “high crime” based on nine gun seizures in four months

When challenged, the government fails to prove that the area of the stop was “high crime.” There were nine gun seizures in four months in a 500 meter radius. “The Government has established, however, that Abass engaged in unprovoked and … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Govt failed to prove area was “high crime” based on nine gun seizures in four months

The Guardian: Kansas county to pay more than $3m over police raiding local newspaper

The Guardian: Kansas county to pay more than $3m over police raiding local newspaper by Lucy Campbell (“Marion county agrees to apologize over 2023 raid that led to national outcry over press freedom, said newspaper’s editor”)

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on The Guardian: Kansas county to pay more than $3m over police raiding local newspaper

FL4: Welfare check not unreasonable just because a crime might also be involved

A 911 call about a potential impaired driver with kids in the car justified the officer’s interaction with the defendant. A welfare community caretaking check isn’t unreasonable just because it’s intertwined with a potential crime. Children can’t be expected to … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on FL4: Welfare check not unreasonable just because a crime might also be involved

E.D.Cal.: A cell phone number in SW papers isn’t reason to seal them

The government doesn’t provide justification for sealing this search warrant application merely because there are cell phone number in it. It is presumptively a public record. In re Matter of Application by United States for Search Warrant to Search, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Discovery, Issue preclusion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: A cell phone number in SW papers isn’t reason to seal them

MS: Forensic search of computer in a county other than where SW was served violates no law

The fact a forensic search of defendant’s computer was done in a county other than where the search warrant for its seizure was executed doesn’t violate any law. Fields v. State, 2025 Miss. App. LEXIS 430 (Nov. 4, 2025). The … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on MS: Forensic search of computer in a county other than where SW was served violates no law