M.D.Fla.: In a false arrest case, the sheriff involved admitted no 4A training

In this false arrest case, the sheriff admitted he had no training in the Fourth Amendment. Harris v. Breeden, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 225584 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2025).

The frisk here was without reasonable suspicion, including the bag defendant had. McKissick v. Commonwealth, 2025 Ky. App. LEXIS 101 (Nov. 14, 2025).*

The court of appeals concludes that there was [barely] reasonable suspicion to continue this stop and it wasn’t based merely on a hunch. The officer articulated some grounds. Dobbin v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 8804 (Tex. App. – Dallas Nov. 14, 2025).* [This should have been reversed. It was really thin.]

There was probable cause for the warrant, and defendant doesn’t even have standing. People v. Delaney, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 9214 (Nov. 17, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standing, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.