Monthly Archives: June 2025

Marshall Project: How AI-Powered Police Forces Watch Your Every Move

Marshall Project: How AI-Powered Police Forces Watch Your Every Move by Jamiles Lartley (“Artificial intelligence is changing how police investigate crimes — and monitor citizens — as regulators struggle to keep pace.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology, Video surveillance | Comments Off on Marshall Project: How AI-Powered Police Forces Watch Your Every Move

TechPolicy.press: A Model Framework for Regulating Geofence Warrants

TechPolicy.press: A Model Framework for Regulating Geofence Warrants by Vivek Krishnamurthy:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on TechPolicy.press: A Model Framework for Regulating Geofence Warrants

NM: Aguilar-Spinelli are still followed here and they were satisfied

Aguilar-Spinelli is still followed in New Mexico, and its strictures were met here. Motion to suppress properly denied, and court of appeals reversed. State v. Perea, 2025 N.M. LEXIS 91 (June 5, 2025):

Posted in Informant hearsay, State constitution | Comments Off on NM: Aguilar-Spinelli are still followed here and they were satisfied

D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated

Defendant’s backpack was searched in 2017, but he wasn’t indicted until 2020, and his case lingered. The officer’s testimony about the search is hazy and inconclusive enough that the court finds cause to dismiss for a speedy trial violation. The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated

CA9 en banc: It’s settled that shooting again a man with a knife who’s already down is excessive

On qualified immunity, it’s been settled for a decade that shooting and killing a man with a knife when he’s already down for the first four shots would be excessive force under Zion v. County of Orange, 874 F.3d 1072 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9 en banc: It’s settled that shooting again a man with a knife who’s already down is excessive

D.Mass.: Pole camera law settled here, even if state court suggests it could differ somewhat

This court is bound by circuit authority from 2009 and 2022 en banc that pole camera surveillance is valid, even if this judge was sympathetic to the argument and the state court might rule differently. United States v. Crisostomo, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Pole camera law settled here, even if state court suggests it could differ somewhat

S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

Paying daily “rent” in drugs is a business transaction without standing. “Although Jackson was an overnight guest insofar as he slept on the couch in the living room, he told law enforcement officers in his interview that he paid McCallister … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

CA9: No warrant required for CI to record def

No warrant was required for the CI to record defendant, following White (1971). United States v. Sudbury, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13921 (9th Cir. June 6, 2025). The state can’t be compelled to seek to unseal the CI’s testimony for … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: No warrant required for CI to record def

D.Alaska: Objection to only part of USMJ’s R&R is waiver of rest

Objection to the USMJ’s probable cause finding but not application of the good faith exception is waiver on the latter. United States v. Baldwin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106406 (D. Alaska June 4, 2025). The legality of the protective sweep … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Protective sweep, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Objection to only part of USMJ’s R&R is waiver of rest

S.D.Tex.: If you’re moving to suppress, at least say what is to be suppressed

Defendant moves to suppress without saying what it is that should be suppressed. [So why not just find it moot?] Defendant raises a Franks challenge and a lack of probable cause. He doesn’t prevail on either. United States v. Alhemoud, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: If you’re moving to suppress, at least say what is to be suppressed

The Appeal: Strip Searches Have a Racist, Dehumanizing Legacy

The Appeal: Strip Searches Have a Racist, Dehumanizing Legacy by Christopher Blackwell & Sarah Sax (“Strip searches—the procedure that triggered this deadly encounter—represent a form of state-sanctioned violence with deep historical roots in American racial oppression. The practice of forcing … Continue reading

Posted in Strip search | Comments Off on The Appeal: Strip Searches Have a Racist, Dehumanizing Legacy

NJ: Entering curtilage to plant GPS device on car exceeded tracking warrant and was suppressed

Police had an otherwise valid warrant to install a tracking device on defendant’s vehicle but in a public place. Instead, they entered the curtilage to install it there. This warrant execution violated the Fourth Amendment and state constitution. The tracking … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Entering curtilage to plant GPS device on car exceeded tracking warrant and was suppressed

EFF: Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

EFF: Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant by Matthew Guariglia (“New reporting has revealed that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) is attempting to create … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on EFF: Hell No: The ODNI Wants to Make it Easier for the Government to Buy Your Data Without Warrant

LA5: Off-duty officer feeling a bag was a search, but bag was abandoned

Defendant left a bag on the counter of a gym and went outside and acted suspicious. An off-duty officer was a customer. He felt the bag, feeling a gun. Then police were called. This qualified as a government search, but … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity, Search, Standing | Comments Off on LA5: Off-duty officer feeling a bag was a search, but bag was abandoned

CA4: GFE doesn’t save search that wasn’t even authorized by the SW

The cell phone warrant here only authorized its seizure, not its search. Therefore, the good faith exception doesn’t even apply to save the search. United States v. Ray, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13483 (4th Cir. June 3, 2025). In sum:

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: GFE doesn’t save search that wasn’t even authorized by the SW

MO: Civil discovery is a due process issue, not 4A one

Civil discovery is a due process issue, not a Fourth Amendment one. The civil discovery here was reasonable. Neighborhood Legal Support of Kansas City v. Ontman, 2025 Mo. App. LEXIS 374 (June 3, 2025), citing State ex rel. Kansas City … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Due process, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Civil discovery is a due process issue, not 4A one

S.D.Ohio: Casting state court’s failure to follow 4A precedent more closely as a due process violation still Stone barred

2254 petitioner’s due process claim that the state court denied due process by not following precedent was barred by Stone. Allen v. Warden, SE. Corr. Inst., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104131 (S.D. Ohio June 2, 2025). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Casting state court’s failure to follow 4A precedent more closely as a due process violation still Stone barred

N.D.Ohio: Visitor getting high and passing out on couch doesn’t give standing to challenge search of premises

Defendant got high and fell asleep on the couch, and he was there when the raid occurred. He didn’t have standing. United States v. Taylor, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103820 (N.D. Ohio June 2, 2025). The government’s motion to reconsider … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Private search, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Visitor getting high and passing out on couch doesn’t give standing to challenge search of premises

CA2: Records production under NYS rent control relief provision doesn’t violate 4A

For landlords to get relief from the 1974 NYS rent stabilization laws, they have to provide some records. This does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Hudson Shore Assocs. Ltd. P’ship v. New York, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13349 (2d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA2: Records production under NYS rent control relief provision doesn’t violate 4A

Cert. granted: Case v. Montana on emergency entries into the home without PC

Case v. Montana, 24-624 (granted June 2, 2025). Question presented: “Whether law enforcement may enter a home without a search warrant based on less than probable cause that an emergency is occurring, or whether the emergency-aid exception requires probable cause.”

Posted in Emergency / exigency, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Cert. granted: Case v. Montana on emergency entries into the home without PC