S.D.Ohio: Casting state court’s failure to follow 4A precedent more closely as a due process violation still Stone barred

2254 petitioner’s due process claim that the state court denied due process by not following precedent was barred by Stone. Allen v. Warden, SE. Corr. Inst., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104131 (S.D. Ohio June 2, 2025).

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging warrantless placing of a GPS on defendant’s vehicle where it had nothing to do with the case. Defendant’s DNA was taken as abandoned in a restaurant and then matched to the crime. That happened before the GPS device was placed. Burdick v. Bousch, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13280 (6th Cir. May 30, 2025).*

Probation and police searched defendant’s place for a handgun which wasn’t found. He was arrested anyway. Later, his girlfriend, aware that the police were concerned about a gun inside, found a locked gun case and turned it over to the police. They got a warrant to open the case. Turning over the gun was a private search. State v. Langley, 319 Neb. 67 (May 30, 2025).*

While other Florida appellate courts have held smell of marijuana alone not to be probable cause for a search, here there is more making probable cause. State v. Simpson, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 4138 (Fla. 6th DCA May 30, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.