Monthly Archives: May 2022

ID: Calling for drug dog before RS existed extended the stop

During the traffic stop, the diversion to call for a drug dog was without reasonable suspicion and it extended the stop. State v. Still, 166 Idaho 351, 458 P.3d 220 (App. 2019), is overruled. State v. Karst, 2022 Ida. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on ID: Calling for drug dog before RS existed extended the stop

M.D.Ala.: Information from seller’s GPS tracker on used car didn’t require a SW

Tracking a used car by its GPS for repossession didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Defendant bought a used car apparently to use in a robbery. A license plate reader identified the car and the police easily tracked it back to … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Information from seller’s GPS tracker on used car didn’t require a SW

W.D.N.C.: § 1983 claim officers dented a door during a raid is not a 4A violation

Claim officers denting a door during a raid is not a Fourth Amendment violation. Fulbright v. Hodges, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85727 (W.D.N.C. May 12, 2022):

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: § 1983 claim officers dented a door during a raid is not a 4A violation

CA2: County order to surrender firearms on losing pistol permit wasn’t a “seizure” of his effects

Plaintiff had his pistol permit revoked under New York law. The County’s requirement he surrender his long guns when that happens is not unreasonable. The court questions whether it’s even a “seizure” of his effects under the Fourth Amendment. (He … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA2: County order to surrender firearms on losing pistol permit wasn’t a “seizure” of his effects

TX13: Stop was consensual but became unreasonable

“We therefore conclude that, although appellant’s encounter with police may have been consensual initially, it advanced into a ‘seizure’ for Fourth Amendment purposes before appellant made any incriminating statements. Because there was no warrant, reasonable suspicion, or probable cause to … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX13: Stop was consensual but became unreasonable

DE: A reporter gets access to SW materials for Apple and social media companies in this murder case

In this two defendant murder case, the state obtained 18 search warrants for Apple and social media, but only one has been returned. A reporter sought access to the affidavits, and it’s granted. Defense counsel has already been given access … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: A reporter gets access to SW materials for Apple and social media companies in this murder case

W.D.Va.: Knock-and-announce isn’t required when no one home

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging execution of the search warrant without knocking and announcing. First, the homeowner wasn’t there; he was in the hospital. Second, Hudson doesn’t permit that challenge under the exclusionary rule. Brown v. Clarke, 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Knock and announce, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Knock-and-announce isn’t required when no one home

IA: Admission of SW affidavit at trial with CI’s version violated confrontation

Admission of the search warrant affidavit here at trial with inadmissible hearsay of the CI was a violation of confrontation. State v. Martinez, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 410 (May 11, 2022). These search warrant materials remain sealed for one year. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on IA: Admission of SW affidavit at trial with CI’s version violated confrontation

IA: Automobile exception search of glove compartment here was unreasonable

Search of the glove compartment is reasonable to look for evidence of ownership of a car already subject to search, but that wasn’t an issue here because there was no reason to. State v. Marcott, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 385 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on IA: Automobile exception search of glove compartment here was unreasonable

TX: Boilerplate in cell phone SW affidavit not unreasonable, but facts of PC must be shown too

Boilerplate language in a search warrant application for a cell phone isn’t inappropriate, but there must still be a factual showing of probable cause for search of the phone. State v. Baldwin, 2022 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 321 (May 11, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Warrant papers | Comments Off on TX: Boilerplate in cell phone SW affidavit not unreasonable, but facts of PC must be shown too

WaPo: When the sheriff waged a war on drugs in a Mississippi county

WaPo: When the sheriff waged a war on drugs in a Mississippi county by Jenn Abelson and Reena Flores (“No-knock raids were the rule rather than the exception, and they led to serious allegations against the department. The sheriff defended … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on WaPo: When the sheriff waged a war on drugs in a Mississippi county

S.D.Ohio: Attempted search incident well after arrest when duffle bag was away from def was not “incident to arrest”; govt overspinned the facts

The officer lacked exigency for a warrantless entry to arrest. Defendant put his duffle bag outside a second story window on the roof to conceal it. It was not abandoned because the public didn’t have access to it. All he … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Attempted search incident well after arrest when duffle bag was away from def was not “incident to arrest”; govt overspinned the facts

PA: Hot pursuit justified officer crossing jurisdictional lines

Hot pursuit justified an officer in one jurisdiction following defendants into another one after a robbery report on their car. Commonwealth v. Hobel, 2022 PA Super 86, 2022 Pa. Super. LEXIS 202 (May 10, 2022) (decided under state statute). “A … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Standards of review | Comments Off on PA: Hot pursuit justified officer crossing jurisdictional lines

LATimes: Immigration officials created network that can spy on majority of Americans, report says

LATimes: Immigration officials created network that can spy on majority of Americans, report says by Cindy Carcamo (“Immigration and Customs Enforcement has crafted a sophisticated surveillance dragnet designed to spy on most people living in the United States, without the … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on LATimes: Immigration officials created network that can spy on majority of Americans, report says

AP: Man pleads guilty in case testing use of geofence warrant

AP (via ABC News): Man pleads guilty in case testing use of geofence warrant (“A Richmond man has pleaded guilty to bank robbery charges in a case that tested the constitutionality of broad search warrants that use Google location history … Continue reading

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on AP: Man pleads guilty in case testing use of geofence warrant

N.D.Ga.: Pro forma objection to R&R doesn’t articulate argument, so it’s waived

Defendant didn’t fairly articulate his objections to the R&R, so his objection is waived. United States v. Hill, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83707 (N.D.Ga. May 9, 2022). There was probable cause for this search authorization, and the good faith exception … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Military searches, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Pro forma objection to R&R doesn’t articulate argument, so it’s waived

CT: John Doe DNA arrest warrant based on touch DNA is too general to satisfy the particularity requirement

A John Doe DNA arrest warrant based on touch DNA is too general to satisfy the particularity requirement. State v. Terrance Police, 2022 Conn. LEXIS 123 (May 10, 2022):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Particularity | Comments Off on CT: John Doe DNA arrest warrant based on touch DNA is too general to satisfy the particularity requirement

MI: REP in def’s barns despite being a distance from home

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in two barns on his farm, one locked and one unlocked with the door partially open. Curtilage to the home doesn’t matter. A later search warrant only described the home and not the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Open fields | Comments Off on MI: REP in def’s barns despite being a distance from home

CA10: “[N]o exclusionary rule for evidence gained through … entrapment”

“[T]here is no exclusionary rule for evidence gained through conduct later deemed to be entrapment.” United States v. Christian, 754 Fed. Appx. 747, 750 (10th Cir. 2018). United States v. Christian, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 12255 (10th Cir. May 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Overseizure | Comments Off on CA10: “[N]o exclusionary rule for evidence gained through … entrapment”

WaPo: 5 takeaways from The Post’s investigation into no-knock warrants

WaPo: 5 takeaways from The Post’s investigation into no-knock warrants by Courtney Kan, Jenn Abelson, and Nicole Dungca (“After police killed Breonna Taylor in her home in 2020 during a botched raid, The Washington Post spent more than a year … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on WaPo: 5 takeaways from The Post’s investigation into no-knock warrants