Category Archives: Seizure

CA6: Change in protective sweep argument between district court and appeal was waiver

Defendant’s protective sweep argument changed from the district court to appeal, so the argument urged here is waived. Below he argued the protective sweep was unreasonably extended but here it’s whether it should have occurred at all. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Change in protective sweep argument between district court and appeal was waiver

D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

Defendant’s Franks motion fails because the government can justify a warrantless search of the vehicle under the automobile exception. United States v. Childs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101370 (D.N.J. May 28, 2025). Plaintiff’s false arrest claim isn’t barred by Heck, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Franks motion fails where a warrant exception applies

W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a seizure

The use of stop sticks was a seizure, but here it was justified. United States v. Jordan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86127 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 4, 2025).* There was nexus for defendant’s place, and the Franks claim isn’t material. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a seizure

M.D.Fla.: Being made to leave during search of premises is not a seizure

Defendant was made to leave the premises while a search occurred inside, and that was not a seizure of his person. United States v. Arcadipane, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82688 (M.D. Fla. May 1, 2025). Defendant, a sex offender on … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Being made to leave during search of premises is not a seizure

AF: Military search authorization orally supplemented was subject to GFE

There were multiple military search authorizations, and the request here was orally supplemented before issuance expanding the particularity. Also, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Johnson, 2025 CCA LEXIS 193 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. May 2, 2025). A … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches, Seizure, Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on AF: Military search authorization orally supplemented was subject to GFE

W.D.Wis.: Code inspectors looking at ptf’s place from the street didn’t violate any REP

“Przychocki alleges that defendants Kearns, Grimm, and Schill violated her Fourth Amendment rights by surveilling her property from the street to identify code violations. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. A government action is a ‘search’ only … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Code inspectors looking at ptf’s place from the street didn’t violate any REP

CA9: Motel owner can’t assert guests’ rights

“Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment claim fails because Plaintiffs cannot assert the rights of the Motel’s guests, Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U.S. 765, 778 (2014), and police entry into the Motel’s public areas does not constitute a search under the Fourth Amendment, … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Motel owner can’t assert guests’ rights

D.N.J.: Boxing in def’s car was a seizure

“Law enforcement’s conduct here—boxing in Deas’ Kia, ordering both Defendants out of the car, and placing them in handcuffs—falls within the scope of a seizure.” It was with reasonable suspicion. Then a dog alerted, then they got a warrant. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Boxing in def’s car was a seizure

ME: Search for ammunition permits a search in small spaces

A search for ammunition permits a search in small spaces. State v. Thomas, 2025 ME 34 (Apr. 1, 2025). “The trial court erred when it mistakenly applied the Texas Rules of Evidence during the motion to suppress hearing by sustaining … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on ME: Search for ammunition permits a search in small spaces

OR: Following def in an unmarked police car is not a seizure, and he voluntarily stopped

Following defendant in an unmarked car was not a seizure. Defendant ultimately voluntarily stopped and talked to the officer. State v. Serini, 2025 Ore. App. LEXIS 446 (Mar. 19, 2025).* When defendant was placed in the patrol car, the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on OR: Following def in an unmarked police car is not a seizure, and he voluntarily stopped

CrimProf Blog: A Hidden Seizure Issue in Barnes v. Felix

CrimProf Blog: A Hidden Seizure Issue in Barnes v. Felix by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer:

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on CrimProf Blog: A Hidden Seizure Issue in Barnes v. Felix

W.D.Ky.: Police battering ram to door and shots fired inside is a seizure

In the Brianna Taylor civil rights prosecution, the battering ram to the door of the apartment with shots being fired was a seizure of the occupants. United States v. Hankison, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29347 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 19, 2025).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Seizure, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Police battering ram to door and shots fired inside is a seizure

S.D.N.Y.: Sublessee of apartment had standing

Sublessee of an apartment had standing to challenge its search. This can’t be compared to burglars or squatters. United States v. Ephron, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28794 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2025). Defendant wasn’t seized during his encounter with the police … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Sublessee of apartment had standing

D.Alaska: It was litigation strategy to not file a motion to suppress and cut def’s losses

It was litigation strategy to not file a motion to suppress and cut defendant’s losses. No ineffective assistance of counsel. United States v. Davis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24036 (D. Alaska Jan. 8, 2025).* The cell phone warrant was sufficiently … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Alaska: It was litigation strategy to not file a motion to suppress and cut def’s losses

E.D.Tenn.: The alleged illegality of the later arrest doesn’t undo def’s abandonment in flight

Defendant fled, he said, in fear of his life, not knowing that it was the police. He abandoned property in flight. The fact the later arrest might turn out to be invalid doesn’t undo the abandonment. United States v. Ross, … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: The alleged illegality of the later arrest doesn’t undo def’s abandonment in flight

DE: Instagram SW was narrowly limited by time

Instagram warrants were supported by probable cause showing both that crimes occurred and that evidence would be found in the account, based on the detailed facts in the affidavits. The warrants satisfied the particularity requirement as the date ranges were … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, Social media warrants | Comments Off on DE: Instagram SW was narrowly limited by time

D.Minn.: Photographs could be taken during execution of SW

Photographs could be taken during execution of a search warrant. United States v. Schultz, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 236848 (D. Minn. Dec. 2, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4918 (D. Minn. Jan. 10, 2025). In a case involving whether … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Photographs could be taken during execution of SW

D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

The fact a state nighttime search warrant doesn’t comply with state law doesn’t matter in federal court. It’s whether Rule 41 and the Fourth Amendment were complied with. Then, the defendant has to show prejudice. Also, the fact defendant had … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.P.R.: State nighttime search rule on state warrant inapplicable in federal court

S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure

“In sum, defendant is not entitled to credit against his sentence for time spent under home confinement as a condition of his bail release. Further, defendant’s time spent on home confinement did not constitute a seizure of his person under … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure

ALPR in action

No law; license plate reader and video showed owner of car not driving: “Detective Smith also obtained footage from the Chevron across the street from Danny & Clyde’s, which allowed him to get a better look at the license plate … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on ALPR in action