Category Archives: Particularity

WaPo: Google cuts part of team that vets police requests for user data

WaPo: +Google cuts part of team that vets police requests for user data by Gerrit De Vynck (“The tech giant gives reams of data to police. It has laid off part of the team that ensures those requests are legal. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, General warrant, Particularity | Comments Off on WaPo: Google cuts part of team that vets police requests for user data

S.D.Ind.: GFE of law at the time of the search meant no IAC

“Counsel did not perform deficiently when they raised the Fourth Amendment argument [under applicable law at the time], even though this Court and the Seventh Circuit found that the good faith applied.” Castro-Aguirre v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: GFE of law at the time of the search meant no IAC

D.Nev.: A website’s cookies linked def’s personal email address for nexus

In a criminal copyright case, cookies on website led to defendant’s business and personal email accounts, and that gave nexus to them for the warrant. “Under the totality of the circumstances, the Court finds that the search warrant reveals a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Nev.: A website’s cookies linked def’s personal email address for nexus

OH5: Cell phone SW was not particular, GFE doesn’t apply, but harmless after all

The cell phone search warrant here failed particularity: “permitted a sweeping, comprehensive search of Hikec’s cell phone with no meaningful limits”, and the good faith exception doesn’t apply. On this record, however, it was harmless error in light of other … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on OH5: Cell phone SW was not particular, GFE doesn’t apply, but harmless after all

MA: Mere denial is not a “substantial preliminary showing” for Franks

The issuing magistrate had probable cause to issue a search warrant for possible child pornography because the affidavit contained the officer’s description of an image depicting nude juveniles from 13-15 years, and the tip provider employee’s personal observation of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on MA: Mere denial is not a “substantial preliminary showing” for Franks

TN: “Possessions” in search clause of state const. gives REP in rural hunting land

Because the Tennessee Constitution uses “possessions” rather than “effects,” plaintiff had a reasonable expectation of privacy in rural land that he used that wildlife officers entered upon to enforce hunting laws. Rainwaters v. Tenn. Wildlife Res. Agency, 2024 Tenn. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on TN: “Possessions” in search clause of state const. gives REP in rural hunting land

W.D.Mo.: Wrong address in SW wasn’t fatal where right house was searched

The affidavit had the correct address but the warrant didn’t. The right house was searched, and the warrant was valid. United States v. Gallagher, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73780 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 28, 2024). Defendant abandoned a gun, hoodie, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Wrong address in SW wasn’t fatal where right house was searched

N.D.Iowa: Drug dog sticking his nose in the open window of car was a search, and here without PC

The drug dog’s sticking his nose in the open window of defendant’s car was a search, and here without probable cause. United States v. Handley, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64531 (N.D. Iowa Apr. 9, 2024). This search warrant is particular … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Foreign searches, Particularity, Trespass | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Drug dog sticking his nose in the open window of car was a search, and here without PC

N.D.Ohio: Refusing discovery on 4A grounds in forfeiture case results in no standing

On remand from the Sixth Circuit in this forfeiture case on the question of standing, claimant asserted Fourth Amendment privilege to all discovery requests about his standing to claim the money. The court finds no facts for standing means no … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Particularity, School searches, Standing, Strip search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Refusing discovery on 4A grounds in forfeiture case results in no standing

D.Idaho: Cellphone warrant was not sufficiently particular and is suppressed; Gmail account not suppressed

The Google email search warrant was sufficiently particular to narrow the search to documents pertaining to a particular land transaction. The search warrant for defendant’s Apple phone and accounts, however, was insufficiently particular and is suppressed. The affidavit attempted to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, E-mail, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Cellphone warrant was not sufficiently particular and is suppressed; Gmail account not suppressed

CA9: Two controlled buys by others afterward going to def’s house was nexus

Nexus to defendant’s house was shown by two controlled buys with others who traveled back to his house afterward. United States v. Espinoza, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 5147 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2024). “The warrant for appellant’s medical records was … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Two controlled buys by others afterward going to def’s house was nexus

E.D.Ky.: Motion for new trial here not ground for illegal search claim

This motion for new trial is not for defendant’s claim that officers hacked his computer to illegally search it. It’s not newly discovered. Moreover, there were questions of the FBI computer analyst about whether the computer had been hacked. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Motion for new trial here not ground for illegal search claim

D.Utah: Facebook account SW was properly limited to time and to crime under investigation and not overbroad

This Facebook account warrant was properly limited. “First, both warrants here were limited to a time period of about one year, from December 11, 2020, to November 17, 2021. As a result, neither warrant allowed the government to search everything … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Utah: Facebook account SW was properly limited to time and to crime under investigation and not overbroad

CA2: A temporal limitation on the SW would have been better, but it’s still cured by GFE

It would have been better for the search warrant to have included a temporal limitation, but that doesn’t have to be decided because the good faith exception is found to apply in any event. United States v. Saint Clair, 2024 … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: A temporal limitation on the SW would have been better, but it’s still cured by GFE

WV: “Mobile cellular phones” particular enough

“The first warrant authorized the seizure of ‘mobile cellular phones,’ clearly imparting sufficient particularity to allow the officer to know that petitioner’s phone was to be seized. Where the warrant clearly authorized seizure of the phone, there can be no … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on WV: “Mobile cellular phones” particular enough

CA3: Nexus doesn’t require positive evidence; inference will do

Nexus doesn’t require positive evidence defendant has drugs at home; an inference suffices. United States v. Green, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 1737 (3d Cir. Jan. 25, 2024). “Kirik’s particularity challenges are unavailing. With respect to Kirik’s challenge to the articulation … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Open fields, Particularity | Comments Off on CA3: Nexus doesn’t require positive evidence; inference will do

CA8: Truly bare bones affidavit for SW fails on GFE

Defendant here actually showed that the affidavit for search warrant was completely lacking in even an inference that defendant might have stolen property on his property. He was located nearby the primary offender, and his criminal history said nothing about … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: Truly bare bones affidavit for SW fails on GFE

NY Erie Co.: Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order didn’t satisfy 4A for criminal case

An officer sought a Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order (TERPO) under NYS law for defendant’s allegedly pointing a gun at his alleged victims from a car. This is a civil remedy, and, here, it did not provide any protection under … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on NY Erie Co.: Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order didn’t satisfy 4A for criminal case

WV: SW for items that are also common to any home doesn’t make warrant general; it’s specific enough

Officers had two search warrants for Gray’s place, and defendant complained that the warrant described things common to any home. There was probable cause for that stuff, and there’s no requirement of a more specific description. State v. Knotts, 2023 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Cell site location information, Particularity | Comments Off on WV: SW for items that are also common to any home doesn’t make warrant general; it’s specific enough

UT: Being hospitalized having been shot by police isn’t “custody” for Miranda purposes

A person hospitalized after having been shot by the police is not per se “in custody” for Miranda purposes. The reason for the shooting was the safety of the officers and others, not custody. Tennessee v. Garner isn’t even close, … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Custody, Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on UT: Being hospitalized having been shot by police isn’t “custody” for Miranda purposes