CA9: Two controlled buys by others afterward going to def’s house was nexus

Nexus to defendant’s house was shown by two controlled buys with others who traveled back to his house afterward. United States v. Espinoza, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 5147 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2024).

“The warrant for appellant’s medical records was sufficiently particular because it authorized a search for appellant’s medical and ambulance records and was limited to the date of the accident and to the hospital at which appellant was treated. Because the warrant restricted the contents, time, and location of the records sought, we conclude that the district court did not err by refusing to suppress the medical records obtained through the warrant.” Also, the doctor-patient privilege doesn’t apply to paramedics. State v. Smeby, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 105 (Mar. 4, 2024).*

Police had reasonable suspicion for the stop of defendant’s Jeep. Police had an automatic weapon shots fired call, and they drove to the scene seeing a Jeep with a shot-out back window. The officer made a U turn and the Jeep fled. That was enough. United States v. Hart, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35781 (D. Minn. Mar. 1, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Nexus, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.