CA11: SW for 15 years worth of records was still particular

The warrant for records was particular, albeit for 15 years worth of bank records, but it matched the time period under investigation, 1/1/05-11/11/19. And the good faith exception applies. United States v. Gyetvay, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 20080 (11th Cir. Aug. 7, 2025).*

There was reasonable suspicion for the stop here based on recorded phone calls and collective knowledge of officers. United States v. Hill, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153244 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025).*

Defendant was ultimately indicted for passport and identity fraud. The search warrant for her bags and laptop stored with someone else was with probable cause. It was reasonable to believe storage was to hide them from law enforcement, too. United States v. Orovio-Hernandez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151182 (D. Mass. Aug. 6, 2025).*

There is no validly pled Fourth Amendment interest in dried blood spots of newborn infants. Lovaglio v. Baston, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153686 (D.N.J. Aug. 8, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.