Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

LA4: Merely having a concealed firearm isn’t RS for a frisk

“The State asserts that the evidence should not be suppressed because the NOPD was entitled to conduct a La. C.Cr.P. art. 215.1, ‘Terry stop’ on Mr. Green, which would have revealed the firearm. See Terry v. Ohio, …. However, the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on LA4: Merely having a concealed firearm isn’t RS for a frisk

OR: Merely driving off the road wasn’t RS, but adding the driver’s demeanor at the time was

“A traffic stop is a ‘seizure’ that requires a constitutional justification. … An officer’s investigative activity during a traffic stop is subject to both durational and subject-matter limitations. … Here, there are two ‘specific and articulable facts’ that support reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Merely driving off the road wasn’t RS, but adding the driver’s demeanor at the time was

OH6: Trial court’s failure to explain RS under Rodriguez required remand

The trial court in denying the motion to suppress didn’t adequately explain the Rodriguez moment and whether there was reasonable suspicion. Remanded. State v. Jeter, 2024-Ohio-1442, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 1356 (6th Dist. Apr. 12, 2024). On the totality of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH6: Trial court’s failure to explain RS under Rodriguez required remand

S.D.N.Y.: Overseas seizure of Russian oligarch’s megayacht not governed by 4A

This megayacht was seized overseas for Russia sanctions. (Eduard Yurievich Khudainatov is the owner, and he’s a Russian oligarch who is a Putin proxy (per Forbes)) The claim that the initial seizure may have violated the Fourth Amendment fails because … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Forfeiture, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Overseas seizure of Russian oligarch’s megayacht not governed by 4A

MO: No duty of care owed by police to fleeing motorist

There was no duty owed to a fleeing motorist who killed himself and his passenger in flight. The police owed a duty to the rest of the locale to stop them. This was reasonable under Scott. Neil v. St. Louis … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on MO: No duty of care owed by police to fleeing motorist

S.D.Fla.: SW application redacted for discovery for now

For the time being, the search warrant application is redacted in discovery under Rule 6(e). “First, the Special Counsel opposes the disclosure of a search warrant application for Defendant De Oliveira’s Gmail account …. This includes the search warrant itself, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW application redacted for discovery for now

CA4: Court instructing that the legality of searches were questions for the court wasn’t error

Defense counsel asked a question about something being in plain view which led to discussion of whether those words were an effort to challenge the search before the jury. The court instructed the jury that the legality of searches was … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA4: Court instructing that the legality of searches were questions for the court wasn’t error

S.D.N.Y.: GJ subpoena for cell phone passcode quashed.

The government’s grand jury subpoena for defendant’s cell phone passcode is quashed because it seeks testimonial information in violation of the Fifth Amendment showing defendant’s knowledge of the contents of the phone. “The Court denies Gray’s Rule 41(g) motion. Even … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: GJ subpoena for cell phone passcode quashed.

M.D.La.: Automobile exception doesn’t apply to car parked in owner’s garage

Under Collins, the automobile exception does not apply to a car parked in the owner’s garage. United States v. Dejoie, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64270 (M.D. La. Apr. 8, 2024). “The exclusionary rule does not apply to ‘physical evidence that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Custody, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Automobile exception doesn’t apply to car parked in owner’s garage

E.D.N.Y.: The search of def’s house started about 6:10 am; the camera time hadn’t been adjusted for DST

Defendant submitted that the search of his house started at 5:00 am. The officers and virtually all the evidence showed it started at 6:10 am. The metadata on some photographs showed 5:16 am. The court finds the camera’s time hadn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Nighttime search, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: The search of def’s house started about 6:10 am; the camera time hadn’t been adjusted for DST

WA: Failure to argue the state constitution to the trial court waived reliance on it on appeal

Failure to argue the state constitution to the trial court waived reliance on it on appeal. State v. Troutman, 2024 Wash. App. LEXIS 672 (Apr. 8, 2024). There was reasonable suspicion for lengthening this detention from the fact the LPN … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on WA: Failure to argue the state constitution to the trial court waived reliance on it on appeal

CA7: Warranted strip search in a private secure setting was conducted reasonably

“Shaw raises three responses, but they are unavailing. First, he contends that the officers did not follow Wisconsin and local laws that instruct officers to obtain written authorization from a supervisor before a strip search. But a violation of state … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Strip search, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA7: Warranted strip search in a private secure setting was conducted reasonably

CA6: It’s clearly established that RS or PC required for a traffic stop

It was clearly established at the time that reasonable suspicion or probable cause was required for a traffic stop. Fact issues remain, so no qualified immunity. King v. City of Rockford, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7327 (6th Cir. Mar. 28, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: It’s clearly established that RS or PC required for a traffic stop

TX: Refusal to consent can’t be part of RS

“The court of appeals should not have considered Appellant’s lawful refusal to consent to the search of his truck when determining if the facts of this case gave rise to reasonable suspicion. Instead, the court of appeals should have considered … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX: Refusal to consent can’t be part of RS

S.D.Ohio: Def’s 50% downward departure on USSG sentencing range makes IAC for not arguing 4A at sentencing moot; harmless error at worst

Where defendant got a 50% downward USSG departure for a 360-life offense, he received no ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to argue a firearm should have been suppressed that led only to a 2 point USSG enhancement. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Def’s 50% downward departure on USSG sentencing range makes IAC for not arguing 4A at sentencing moot; harmless error at worst

CO: School search of serial offender under firearms “safety plan” was reasonable

The juvenile here was searched for weapons three days into his sophomore year. He was known to bring firearms to school, and his family and the school developed a “safety plan” to permit searches, which happened most of the freshman … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, School searches | Comments Off on CO: School search of serial offender under firearms “safety plan” was reasonable

OH1: Opening car door for officer safety here without RS; sweep of car unreasonable

Defendant in his car in a high crime area with overly tinted windows was not reasonable suspicion. Any furtive movements were attributed to the officer opening the door to see in the car for officer safety. The protective sweep of … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Opening car door for officer safety here without RS; sweep of car unreasonable

CA11: Even if Carpenter applied to license plate readers, it happened before Carpenter was decided so good faith applies

Even if Carpenter applied to automated license plate readers, it was decided the day after this happened, so the good faith exception would apply in any event. In addition, the officer’s testimony about it was lay testimony under F.R.E. 702. … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on CA11: Even if Carpenter applied to license plate readers, it happened before Carpenter was decided so good faith applies

OH1: Missing notary seal on SW affidavit not an error of constitutional magnitude, so no suppression

A search warrant isn’t void because the affidavit in support was missing a notary seal. The rest of the statutory requirements were satisfied, and this wasn’t an error of constitutional magnitude. State v. Whittle, 2024-Ohio-1023,2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 958 (1st … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH1: Missing notary seal on SW affidavit not an error of constitutional magnitude, so no suppression

CA2: District court erred in suppressing a SW executed at 6 am where SW and Rule 41 say 6 am to 10 pm

This search warrant was executed at 6 am, and the district court erred in granting the motion to suppress. “While 6:00 a.m. is the earliest time provided, it cannot be said that executing a warrant in accordance with its text–which … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Knock and announce, Nighttime search, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA2: District court erred in suppressing a SW executed at 6 am where SW and Rule 41 say 6 am to 10 pm