Category Archives: Probable cause

E.D.Cal.: Out-of-bounds camping stop led to RS and that led to PC

Defendant was stopped for out-of-bounds camping by a park ranger. The conversation led to reasonable suspicion then to probable cause for a search. United States v. Gearhart, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146610 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2024). Obviously, vehicle stops … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Out-of-bounds camping stop led to RS and that led to PC

N.D.Miss.: Def’s arguments against the PC showing in the SW go more toward a trial defense, not PC

Probable cause and good faith arguments about three images of child pornography in the affidavit out of 121 total, were more toward a defense of the charge and do not undermine probable cause. United States v. Murphy, 2024 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Def’s arguments against the PC showing in the SW go more toward a trial defense, not PC

CA7: No court has suppressed a Playpen SW, and changing the argument up a bit doesn’t succeed either

Every court to have dealt with the good faith exception in Playpen warrants has sustained them. This case attempts a different casting of the argument, but it’s rejected too. United States v. Dorosheff, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19590 (7th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: No court has suppressed a Playpen SW, and changing the argument up a bit doesn’t succeed either

CADC: Ptf’s arrest on mistaken identity was still reasonable

The District Court correctly granted qualified immunity to an officer who detained plaintiff due to a mistaken identity fugitive warrant because there was no showing that any reasonable official in the defendant’s shoes would have understood that he was violating … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CADC: Ptf’s arrest on mistaken identity was still reasonable

CA8: PC shown for SW for home in MMJ state on smell of marijuana plus other information

The fact there is medical marijuana in the state did not defeat the probable cause showing because there was also information about alleged sales from the property. Here, the police went to defendant’s home for a knock-and-talk and could smell … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: PC shown for SW for home in MMJ state on smell of marijuana plus other information

D.Mont.: Asking about drugs made this stop intimidating and governed by Rodrieguez

During this stop, the officer finally asked about drugs in the car. “At this moment, the encounter became intimidating, and a reasonable person in Tripp’s situation would not feel free to leave. The encounter thus ripened into a Terry, or … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Asking about drugs made this stop intimidating and governed by Rodrieguez

CA11: While prison visitor strip search violated 4A, SCOTUS and this circuit have never ruled, so QI applies [and QI reigns supreme]

A prison visitor was fully strip searched on entry into a Georgia state prison. This search violated the Fourth Amendment. But, because this circuit and SCOTUS have never confronted this issue, the law is not “clearly established” and she loses … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on CA11: While prison visitor strip search violated 4A, SCOTUS and this circuit have never ruled, so QI applies [and QI reigns supreme]

MN: PC required to get order to produce DNA for comparison to evidence

A court order for defendant’s saliva for a touch DNA comparison required a showing of probable cause. State v. Steeprock, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 345 (July 29, 2024). “[T]he record evidence demonstrates that three police officers ran from the police … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Private search, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on MN: PC required to get order to produce DNA for comparison to evidence

TX3: Wife conducted private search of husband’s cell phone by using his thumb to open it while he was asleep

In Texas where a private search can be suppressed, defendant showed that his wife accessed his cell phone without his consent, and the search was suppressed. She used his thumb to open the phone while he was asleep. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Private search, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX3: Wife conducted private search of husband’s cell phone by using his thumb to open it while he was asleep

CA8: When it was immediately apparent that RS for the stop no longer existed, it should have ended

As the officer approached the car stopped for suspicion of shoplifting, it was immediately apparent that the occupants did not match the description of the shoplifters he was looking for. The stop should have ended then. Storrs v. Rozeboom, 2024 … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: When it was immediately apparent that RS for the stop no longer existed, it should have ended

D.C.Cir.: SW for multiple cell phones was valid because all were shown to be involved

This search warrant for multiple cell phones showed enough that multiple cell phones were involved in the offense under investigation, and, thus, the warrant was not overbroad, distinguishing United States v. Griffith, 867 F.3d 1265 (D.C. Cir. 2017) where there … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: SW for multiple cell phones was valid because all were shown to be involved

Cal.4: Defense subpoena for social media records was not improperly issued and enforced; holders of records got to be heard under SCA

Denying the state’s motion to quash a criminal subpoena duces tecum issued to social media companies was not error. Under the Stored Communications Act, the trial court allowed the companies an opportunity to be heard, conducted a sufficient analysis of … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Stored Communications Act, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Cal.4: Defense subpoena for social media records was not improperly issued and enforced; holders of records got to be heard under SCA

CA5: GFE first (was reliance objectively reasonable), PC second

“Warrants are reviewed under a two-part test. In the first step, we determine whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies. Under that exception, ‘evidence obtained from [a] search will not be excluded’ even if ‘probable cause for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: GFE first (was reliance objectively reasonable), PC second

W.D.Mo.: Def didn’t show he was driving overdue rented car with anyone’s permission

Defendant had no standing in the rented car he was driving. It was rented by another person, and it had not been timely returned. He didn’t show that he was driving with anyone’s permission. United States v. Manning, 2024 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Def didn’t show he was driving overdue rented car with anyone’s permission

D.Md.: Review of PC isn’t as skeptical as def requests

“Here, the affidavit easily meets the standard of probable cause. Defendants would require a level of skepticism that is not appropriate to the oversight at this juncture. The scheme to defraud was amply established by the affiant and so was … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Md.: Review of PC isn’t as skeptical as def requests

LA4: Being seen in a “drug hot spot” adds nothing to RS

Being seen in NOLA “drug hot spots” doesn’t add anything to reasonable suspicion. Suppression affirmed. State v. Tate, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1107 (La. App. 4 Cir. July 11, 2024). The complainant’s telling the police of being drugged for sex … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA4: Being seen in a “drug hot spot” adds nothing to RS

NY3: SW for evidence of robbery (stolen property and mask) found def’s cell phone with image of him wearing the mask on its wallpaper

A search warrant in a robbery case looked for stolen property and the mask involved. When police executed the warrant, they found his cell phone with him wearing the mask as the wallpaper image on the phone. “We find without … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY3: SW for evidence of robbery (stolen property and mask) found def’s cell phone with image of him wearing the mask on its wallpaper

W.D.Wis.: Jurisdictional issue in SW wasn’t enough to suppress here

In a domestic terrorism investigation, USMJs have the authority to issue search warrants outside their court’s jurisdiction. Defendant disputes that this investigation was not that, but it’s close enough. Even if the officers were mistaken, the court won’t suppress an … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Jurisdictional issue in SW wasn’t enough to suppress here

W.D.Ky.: SW affidavit does not have to negate affirmative defenses under Franks

Under Franks, an affidavit for a search warrant does not have to negate a possible affirmative defense. United States v. Pascoe, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119992 (W.D. Ky. July 9, 2024). There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest for DUI … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: SW affidavit does not have to negate affirmative defenses under Franks

S.D.Ohio: Indicia of residency can be subject to search and seizure under a SW

The search warrant could seek to seize documents tending to show defendant’s control of the premises [indicia of ownership or control] under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Moore, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119486 (S.D. Ohio July 2, 2024). There … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Indicia of residency can be subject to search and seizure under a SW