Category Archives: Warrant execution

Kansas Reflector: In Marion County newspaper raid, a grim threat to Kansans’ First Amendment rights

Kansas Reflector: In Marion County newspaper raid, a grim threat to Kansans’ First Amendment rights by Clay Wirestone:

Posted in Privileges, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Kansas Reflector: In Marion County newspaper raid, a grim threat to Kansans’ First Amendment rights

M.D.Tenn.: 4A unreasonable search clause may apply to excessive damaging search

In executing a search warrant unreasonably causing excessive and unnecessary property damage, the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment almost never applies, but the Fourth Amendment’s unreasonable search clause may. Slaybaugh v. Rutherford Cty., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149105 (M.D. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: 4A unreasonable search clause may apply to excessive damaging search

CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”

Defendant came in to the police for an interview about sex assault in the Army. As it developed, exigency for seizure of defendant’s cell phone arose. This was not a police created exigency which requires some wrongdoing on the part … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”

D.Conn.: Apparent overbreadth in SW cured by GFE on how it was executed and on what

The search warrant didn’t specify the crime under investigation and that was a problem for particularity. That could have been cured by the affidavit being attached to the warrant at execution but it wasn’t. It was referred to in the … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Apparent overbreadth in SW cured by GFE on how it was executed and on what

Reason: A SWAT Team Destroyed an Innocent Man’s Shop. Then the City Left Him With the Bill.

Reason: A SWAT Team Destroyed an Innocent Man’s Shop. Then the City Left Him With the Bill. by Billy Binion (“Pena didn’t fault the city for attempting to subdue an allegedly dangerous person. But he objected to what came next: … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Reason: A SWAT Team Destroyed an Innocent Man’s Shop. Then the City Left Him With the Bill.

E.D.Ark.: Ptf’s Facebook posts shooting guns supported use of flashbang during drug raid

Plaintiff’s Facebook posts of her shooting guns on her property supported the use of flashbang devices when her house was subjected to a drug raid by the SWAT team. Davenport v. City of Little Rock, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119102 … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Ptf’s Facebook posts shooting guns supported use of flashbang during drug raid

E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

Leaving the wrong search warrant at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress. United States v. Major, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116569 (E.D. La. July 7, 2023). The CI had no track record, but his story … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Leaving the wrong SW at the scene of the search is not a ground to suppress

OH5: Pickup of visitor parked on street could be searched with SW for premises where it was suspected of drug transactions there

Defendant’s pickup was parked on the street in front of another man’s house that was searched with a warrant. His truck was searched too, but wasn’t mentioned in the warrant. “We find the search of the truck was authorized by … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH5: Pickup of visitor parked on street could be searched with SW for premises where it was suspected of drug transactions there

E.D.Cal.: “No viable Takings Clause claim occurs when property has been disturbed by a lawful search warrant.”

“No viable Takings Clause claim occurs when property has been disturbed by a lawful search warrant. See AmeriSource Corp. v. United States, 525 F.3d 1149, 1154 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (‘so long as the government’s exercise of authority was pursuant to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: “No viable Takings Clause claim occurs when property has been disturbed by a lawful search warrant.”

TX: Def had no REP in work truck searched by owner at police request three days after his arrest and expiration of SW

Recognizing that Byrd holds that a person can have standing in a vehicle owned and maybe even operated by another: “Does an employee retain standing to contest a search or seizure in his work vehicle several days after he was … Continue reading

Posted in Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TX: Def had no REP in work truck searched by owner at police request three days after his arrest and expiration of SW

NM: SW for bodily standards in case pending for trial not 4A or due process violation

After defendant was indicted a search warrant for bodily standards was sought from the metropolitan court. It didn’t lose jurisdiction for a search warrant, even in a case pending in a “higher” trial court. “[P]ost-indictment warrants are lawful in New … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NM: SW for bodily standards in case pending for trial not 4A or due process violation

E.D.Tex.: No right to ex ante notice of email SW to challenge it before execution; remedy is after

An email account holder does not have a right to notice before execution of an email warrant. Moreover, he or she has no standing to challenge a search warrant for email before the warrant is executed. In re Search of … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: No right to ex ante notice of email SW to challenge it before execution; remedy is after

OH5, D.Minn.: Not calling additional witnesses at suppression hearing didn’t change outcome

There was reasonable suspicion for the stop here, and defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not calling another witness that wouldn’t have changed the outcome. State v. Ware, 2023-Ohio-1807 (5th Dist. May 30, 2023).* In a tax warrant case, defense counsel … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH5, D.Minn.: Not calling additional witnesses at suppression hearing didn’t change outcome

NY Co.: SW not timely executed is suppressed

Search warrants in NY have to be executed within ten days. This cell phone warrant wasn’t, so suppression is granted. The order is stayed so the state can decide whether to appeal. People v. Nurse, 2023 NY Slip Op 23167, … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY Co.: SW not timely executed is suppressed

OH3: Invalid admin SW was saved by GFE

An administrative search warrant issued under the state criminal procedure law was invalid because of limits on who could request and serve a warrant (i.e., law enforcement officers and prosecutors). However, the good faith exception applies to administrative warrants, too. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH3: Invalid admin SW was saved by GFE

N.D.Cal.: “A small constitutional violation is no less a constitutional violation” here a cell phone search that is suppressed

The government attempted to access defendant’s cell phone in the jurisdiction but couldn’t. It sent it to Quantico for a “brute force” password attempt that could involve 1,000,000 combinations with waiting periods defined by the software they installed. Some brute … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: “A small constitutional violation is no less a constitutional violation” here a cell phone search that is suppressed

CAAF: The methodology of a search doesn’t have to be the best to still be reasonable

A flashing incident on a Marine base in December 2018 led to a search authorization of defendant’s cell phone. The images on the phone were first sorted by size instead of date, and that led to accidentally discovering an apparent … Continue reading

Posted in Overseizure, Plain view, feel, smell, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CAAF: The methodology of a search doesn’t have to be the best to still be reasonable

CA4: “[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.”

“[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.” Osmon v. United States, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9177 (4th Cir. Apr. 18, 2023). Defendant’s Franks motion fails because there’s no offer of proof … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Staleness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: “[T]he ability to execute a search does not necessarily imply power to execute a search warrant.”

E.D.Pa.: Homeowner can be handcuffed during home search without his being arrested

Having the homeowner in handcuffs during a search of his house and then releasing him when done is reasonable under Michigan v. Summers. Armstrong v. Gretsky, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63028 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 11, 2023). Defendant parolee tried to … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Homeowner can be handcuffed during home search without his being arrested

D.Minn.: Def didn’t show prejudice or unreasonableness from execution of SW before 6 am

Even if the search warrant was executed here before 6 a.m., defendant doesn’t show any prejudice by that. A cell phone is not exigency in itself, but here there was at least some risk of destruction of evidence because defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Inventory, Nighttime search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def didn’t show prejudice or unreasonableness from execution of SW before 6 am