Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

KS: Arrest and search were in KCMO, trial in KCKS; 4A applies no matter what; no state law issues

Conflict of laws: Defendant’s arrest and search was in Kansas City, Missouri, but his offense was tried in Kansas City, Kansas. State law on this doesn’t matter. Applying the Fourth Amendment, it was all legal. State v. Green, 2025 Kan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Good faith exception, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on KS: Arrest and search were in KCMO, trial in KCKS; 4A applies no matter what; no state law issues

W.D.Okla.: Prison cell search not following policy not a 4A violation

Guard not following prison policy by conducting a cell search alone doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Freeman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112882 (W.D. Okla. June 13, 2025). Plaintiff EMT’s drug test for an accident in his ambulance … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Prison and jail searches, Standards of review | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Prison cell search not following policy not a 4A violation

D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

Reading a prisoner’s legal mail may violate the First Amendment, but he can’t show that it violated the Fourth Amendment because there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in prison and nothing interfered with his cases. Lewis v. Conway, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.Or.: Search of legal mail in prison is a 1A claim, not 4A

D.N.J.: Admin SW can’t be quashed before execution

The company here refused an OSHA administrative inspection, so OSHA got an administrative warrant. Then the company moved to quash. Citing In re Anthony Marano Company, 556 F. Supp. 3d 890 (N.D. Ill. 2021), the court holds there is no … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Motion to suppress, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Admin SW can’t be quashed before execution

D.Nev.: There’s no 4A claim from officers running the serial number of a gun found in plain view

There is no Fourth Amendment claim for officers running the serial number of a gun after it was lawfully encountered, so no ineffective assistance of counsel. United States v. Hylton, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71338 (D. Nev. Apr. 14, 2025). … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review, Strip search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: There’s no 4A claim from officers running the serial number of a gun found in plain view

E.D.Pa.: A prison inmate has no standing in his cell

Correctional officers found 20 cell phones in defendant’s cell. He has no standing in his cell. As to the cell phone searches, even if he had standing, the warrants were not overbroad. United States v. Nasir, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: A prison inmate has no standing in his cell

S.D.N.Y.: Warrantless criminal investigative cell search was reasonable

Defendant was in pretrial detention arrested three days earlier in a murder-for-hire scheme. Jailors searched his cell, apparently as a part of the original criminal investigation, looking for cell phone which he attempted to destroy. He moved to suppress. “The … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Warrantless criminal investigative cell search was reasonable

W.D.Va.: No REP in non-legal jail mail from being scanned for tablet viewing

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in non-legal mail in jail. Here, mail was scanned and made into a pdf for viewing on a tablet. Cecil v. Keller, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56313 (W.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2025).* A … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No REP in non-legal jail mail from being scanned for tablet viewing

E.D.Mich.: Ptf’s jail strip search on camera after contact visit was reasonable

Plaintiff’s jail strip search after a contact visit was reasonable, and the fact it was on camera doesn’t make it unreasonable. Parker v. Robert J. White Mich. Dep’t of Corr., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48519 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 27, 2025):

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Ptf’s jail strip search on camera after contact visit was reasonable

CA10: Cross-gender prison strip search of transgender woman stated claim

A cross-gender jail strip search of a transgender woman with gender dysphoria stated a claim. Griffith v. El Paso Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 3734 (10th Cir. Feb. 19, 2025). Defendant was involved in a head-on crash driving on the … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on CA10: Cross-gender prison strip search of transgender woman stated claim

S.D.N.Y.: Sublessee of apartment had standing

Sublessee of an apartment had standing to challenge its search. This can’t be compared to burglars or squatters. United States v. Ephron, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28794 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2025). Defendant wasn’t seized during his encounter with the police … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Sublessee of apartment had standing

N.D.Iowa: Jail strip search for safety purposes was reasonable

This jail strip search under the jail’s policy for safety purposes was reasonable. United States v. Sutton, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10974 (N.D. Iowa Jan. 22, 2025).* Not the countervailing considerations:

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Jail strip search for safety purposes was reasonable

CA3: Conviction for threats by internet justified supervised release condition of computer monitoring

Where defendant was convicted of making threats over the internet to a Congressman, a two year computer monitoring condition was reasonable and did not violate the First and Fourth Amendment. United States v. Hall, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1109 (3d … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Excessive force, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on CA3: Conviction for threats by internet justified supervised release condition of computer monitoring

E.D.Okla.: Search of lawyers and their cars coming into jail did not obstruct access to counsel

Stopping and searching the car and person of defense counsel coming into a USMS jail did not violate defendant’s right to access to counsel. The limitations were all reasonable. United States v. Freeman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6745 (E.D. Okla. … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Search of lawyers and their cars coming into jail did not obstruct access to counsel

E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

Officers were surveilling a van that they believed might have a connection to an unsolved homicide. They observed what appeared to be hand-to-hand drug transactions, and the van’s LPN was expired. They approached. There were others around the van, and … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: No claim where no damages shown for alleged unreasonable dog sniff; nothing was found, detention was otherwise reasonable

W.D.Va.: No REP prison visit with nonlawyer wouldn’t be videorecorded on bodycam

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison visit with his brother being recorded on body camera of a nearby correctional officer. Saunders v. Vilbrandt, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 989 (W.D. Va. Jan. 2, 2025).* “To the extent … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Video surveillance | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No REP prison visit with nonlawyer wouldn’t be videorecorded on bodycam

E.D.Cal.: Successor habeas petition can’t be based on withheld information of a 4A violation

A successor habeas can’t be based on allegedly withheld evidence of a Fourth Amendment violation. Sanchez v. Cates, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 226067 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2024). Defendant can’t show that defense counsel was ineffective for not moving to … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Successor habeas petition can’t be based on withheld information of a 4A violation

NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

Defendant was in a special housing unit in a NY state prison. He knew he was under constant surveillance. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in admissions he made caught on video. People v. Ashcroft, 2024 NY Slip Op … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Surveillance technology, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

In a motion to sever counts for trial, it was significant that the stuff was seized under the same search warrant. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217086 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2024). There was probable cause and nexus … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA

No search warrant is needed for the jail to turn over plaintiff’s jail telephone calls to the DA’s office. Wallace v. Maricopa Cty. Prosecutor’s Office, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209545 (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024).* When an officer invokes the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Voluntariness | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW not needed to turn over jail calls to DA