NY3: No REP in SHU surveillance

Defendant was in a special housing unit in a NY state prison. He knew he was under constant surveillance. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in admissions he made caught on video. People v. Ashcroft, 2024 NY Slip Op 06077, 2024 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6500 (3d Dept. Dec. 5, 2024).

“These Non-Public NYPD Patrol Guide Entries ‘deal with sensitive law enforcement topics and tactics’ regarding confidential informants and search warrant applications, and publicly releasing these documents ‘could potentially … jeopardize current search warrant investigations.’ … The City also seeks to redact the case numbers in Exhibit 5, a spreadsheet listing certain cases from the NYPD’s Disciplinary Administrative Database System, stating that ‘this information is sensitive as it implicates the City’s internal procedures for disciplining its employees.’ … The City’s proposed redaction is necessary to protect its privacy interest and narrowly tailored to do so.” Parkinson v. Desormeau, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219610 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 4, 2024).*

The City’s motion for summary judgment on excessive force was properly granted. Defendant didn’t rebut the City’s MSJ papers. Purcell v. City of N.Y., 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30679 (2d Cir. Dec. 5, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Surveillance technology, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.