E.D.Pa.: A prison inmate has no standing in his cell

Correctional officers found 20 cell phones in defendant’s cell. He has no standing in his cell. As to the cell phone searches, even if he had standing, the warrants were not overbroad. United States v. Nasir, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72018 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 15, 2025).

In a traffic stop on a quiet street albeit in a high crime area, defendant and his passenger getting out of their truck before the police car lights were even on was concerning enough to the officer to ask about weapons. A protective weapons search was justified. United States v. Antley, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72249 (D.R.I. Apr. 16, 2025).*

“Probable cause only requires a ‘fair probability’ that police would find evidence of criminal conduct in executing the warrant; it does not require conclusive evidence that Ms. Freeman was engaged in criminal conduct. … A commonsense analysis of the Affidavit supports the conclusion that there was at least a fair probability Ms. Freeman was transporting contraband.” In addition, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Freeman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72350 (D. Minn. Mar. 19, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.