Category Archives: Good faith exception

CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s seizure on the totality. But, “Sierra-Ayala’s intervening volitional act, in the absence of exploitative behavior by López-Maysonet, renders the discovery of the drugs sufficiently attenuated so as to dissipate the taint of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. People who live in a “high crime area” do not have lesser constitutional protection. The facts here just didn’t support a frisk, and he had a right to refuse one, and that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS

PA: No REP in drug prescription database

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy nor HIPAA privacy in a drug prescription database. Commonwealth v. McFarland, 2022 PA Super 116, 2022 Pa. Super. LEXIS 288 (June 29, 2022). Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim was litigated before trial and on … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Waiver | Comments Off on PA: No REP in drug prescription database

WY: Pending drug case is not RS, but it is “a piece of the puzzle”

The collective knowledge of two officers justified this stop. One defendant’s pending drug case was not reasonable suspicion itself, but it was “a piece of the puzzle.” Guandong v. State, 2022 WY 83, 2022 Wyo. LEXIS 83 (June 28, 2022). … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: Pending drug case is not RS, but it is “a piece of the puzzle”

CA3: Not plain error to fail to exclude potential prejudicial testimony about risk of violence in execution of SW

Testimony about how a search warrant was executed as it was could have prejudiced defendant by revealing the government thought he was violent before arrest. It was not, however, plain error on this record without an objection. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA3: Not plain error to fail to exclude potential prejudicial testimony about risk of violence in execution of SW

D.Ariz.: PC so lacking, “this is a no-brainer”

“The Court finds that the search warrant affidavit comes nowhere near to establishing probable cause for the search of the cell phone. Simply put, this is a no-brainer. In fact, the government’s conclusory argument noted above demonstrates the futility of … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: PC so lacking, “this is a no-brainer”

IA: Failure to articulate why state const. applies for different result is waiver

Failure to articulate one’s argument that the state constitution requires a different result is waiver. State v. Versteegh, 2022 Iowa App. LEXIS 434 (June 15, 2022). “Here, the issuing judge reasonably concluded, based on all of the circumstances, that there … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on IA: Failure to articulate why state const. applies for different result is waiver

E.D.Tex.: Whether RV was immobile and used as a residence doesn’t matter where GFE applies

“In his third numbered objection, Lee argues that contrary to Officer Kennedy’s testimony, the RV was completely immobile at the time it was searched and that it was being used as a residence. But whether the RV was mobile or … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Whether RV was immobile and used as a residence doesn’t matter where GFE applies

E.D.Pa.: 4A doesn’t even require SW be signed if PC was found by issuing magistrate; signing in wrong place doesn’t matter

The issuing magistrate’s failure to sign the warrant in the appropriate place is not a Fourth Amendment violation. The Fourth Amendment does not even require the search warrant be signed by the issuing magistrate as long as probable cause was … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: 4A doesn’t even require SW be signed if PC was found by issuing magistrate; signing in wrong place doesn’t matter

CA9: Arrest on 7 year old PV warrant was 4A reasonable; state law violation not relevant to reasonableness inquiry

Plaintiff’s arrest on a parole retake warrant not executed for seven years was still reasonable on the totality. “Even if Cornel’s arrest violated state law, it was not necessarily a violation of her Fourth Amendment rights. The Supreme Court has … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest on 7 year old PV warrant was 4A reasonable; state law violation not relevant to reasonableness inquiry

NY Bronx: REP in one’s apartment building mailbox

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his mailbox in an apartment building from unreasonable searches. A search warrant was sought through the Bronx DA, but they were short staffed and recommended the officers get landlord consent. That was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Mail and packages, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NY Bronx: REP in one’s apartment building mailbox

CA8: Shoplifting arrest supported search incident of backpack; inevitable anyway

The search of defendant’s backpack incident to a shoplifting arrest produced a firearm. Even if the search incident wasn’t proper, it was inevitable the backpack would be inventoried at the jail.United States v. Trogdon, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 15860 (8th … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident | Comments Off on CA8: Shoplifting arrest supported search incident of backpack; inevitable anyway

CA8: Apparent authority to consent applies to effects

Apparent authority to consent applies to effects. The officer had reason to believe that the other female occupant of the car had apparent authority to consent to a search of what was listed in the report as a “man bag,” … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8: Apparent authority to consent applies to effects

E.D.Mich.: Def had standing in his brother’s garage where only they had keys and it was used for business purposes

The warrantless search of defendant’s brother’s garage where both had keys and defendant kept things from their construction business was unreasonable. Defendant had standing because it was used for business purposes, and he did not have to spend the night … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def had standing in his brother’s garage where only they had keys and it was used for business purposes

D.Minn.: Tracking warrant issued without PC, but GFE still applied

There was no probable cause for the tracking warrant for defendant. But, it was not so lacking in probable cause that the good faith exception does not apply. United States v. Escudero, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89120 (D.Minn. May 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Tracking warrant issued without PC, but GFE still applied

CA5: GFE applies to showing of nexus

The good faith exception applies to the warrant affidavit’s showing of nexus. The showing wasn’t great, but it was sufficient to not be bare bones. The officer adequately connected defendant to the premises. United States v. Jackson, 2022 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: GFE applies to showing of nexus

OH1: Doing nothing unusual or criminal 5 minutes after ShotSpotter alert wasn’t RS

Officers found defendant putting his kids in his car about five minutes after a ShotSpotter alert where no one had complained of gunfire. His ultimate frisk lacked reasonable suspicion. State v. Henson, 2022-Ohio-1571, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1482 (1st Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Doing nothing unusual or criminal 5 minutes after ShotSpotter alert wasn’t RS

DE: A reporter gets access to SW materials for Apple and social media companies in this murder case

In this two defendant murder case, the state obtained 18 search warrants for Apple and social media, but only one has been returned. A reporter sought access to the affidavits, and it’s granted. Defense counsel has already been given access … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: A reporter gets access to SW materials for Apple and social media companies in this murder case

S.D.Ohio: Attempted search incident well after arrest when duffle bag was away from def was not “incident to arrest”; govt overspinned the facts

The officer lacked exigency for a warrantless entry to arrest. Defendant put his duffle bag outside a second story window on the roof to conceal it. It was not abandoned because the public didn’t have access to it. All he … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Attempted search incident well after arrest when duffle bag was away from def was not “incident to arrest”; govt overspinned the facts

D.Idaho: To claim GFE, govt at least should have shown the officers read the inadequate affidavit to show reasonable reliance

The affidavit for the search warrant here was for evidence of rioting issued months after the riot, and it led to finding a weapon and some drugs and a cell phone seizure and search. To invoke the good faith exception, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Idaho: To claim GFE, govt at least should have shown the officers read the inadequate affidavit to show reasonable reliance