CA8: Court can consider GFE rather than decide PC

“‘[T]his Court ‘may consider the applicability of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule,’ without addressing whether probable cause exists.” Here, there was enough to likely show probable cause so the officer reasonably believed in the validity of the warrant. United States v. Norey, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 10041 (8th Cir. Apr. 14, 2022).

“Smith alleges that the deputies aimed guns at him, ‘activated the sirens and flashers on their vehicles, commanded [him] to exit his vehicle, handcuffed [him], and tried to place [him] into the back of a squad car.’ But those measures typify our cases dismissing claims of de facto arrest. It is ‘reasonable to detain a suspect at gunpoint, handcuff [him], and place [him] in a police car’ during an investigatory stop. … And unlike many of those cases, here the officers detained Smith for mere minutes, releasing him after he denied aiming his gun at another driver.” Smith v. Heap, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 10144 (5th Cir. Apr. 14, 2022).*

There is no showing that the omitted facts in this affidavit would have affected the probable cause finding. Nor is there a showing of recklessness or intention to mislead. United States v. Lott, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69810 (M.D.Ala. Apr. 15, 2022).*

This entry was posted in Custody, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.